  | 
                 
                 
                  |  
                     Going home: Asked to vacate their hostels, Sathyabama's 
                      engineering students head home 
                   | 
                 
               
               KATTANKULATHUR, 
                KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT NEAR CHENNAI 
                February 27 
               It 
                was nearing midnight on February 27th, but no engineering student 
                in the hostels of SRM Institute of Science & Technology at 
                Kattankulathur was asleep. It is not unusual for students at engineering 
                colleges to burn the midnight oil. But today, it wasn't the approaching 
                exams that played on their minds. Rather, the students were rattled 
                by a bigger question-one concerning their very future. On February 
                16, the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), the 
                regulatory body for technical education across the country, issued 
                a notice stating that "all institutions" offering technical 
                education should obtain AICTE approval before March 7. That meant 
                deemed universities, which have always regarded the University 
                Grants Commission (UGC) and not AICTE as their master, would need 
                to get such an approval or lose the right to offer and award degrees 
                for technical courses.  
               Earlier in the day, worried students had 
                tried to find out from the institute's management whether their 
                courses were certified, but no clear answers were forthcoming. 
                So at midnight, when the "minders" hired by the management 
                to keep protests under check were away, the technical students 
                decided to give vent to their frustrations. It started off as 
                a regular protest-a lot of shouting and banner-raising-but soon 
                descended into stone-throwing. Windows were smashed and some computers 
                and equipment damaged. But before the students could inflict too 
                much damage, the police arrived and lathi-charged them. According 
                to the institute, 22 students were arrested, but G. Selva, President 
                of Students Federation of India (SFI) in Tamil Nadu, says the 
                number was only eight. "The parents of those students were 
                not informed immediately by the institute, and they spent two 
                days in jail. It was SFI that got them out on bail," says 
                Selva.  
              
                 
                    | 
                 
                 
                  |  
                     Seeking answers: Empty corridors and shattered window 
                      panes at Sathyabama in the wake of student protests 
                   | 
                 
               
              SRM wasn't the only institute at the receiving 
                end of student ire. The first protests occurred at the Vinayaka 
                Mission's Research Foundation in Salem, followed by SRM and then 
                another famous institution in Chennai, Sathyabama Deemed University, 
                promoted by Jeppiaar, a former legislator in the mgr government. 
                At Sathyabama, the protests took place on March 1, when the students 
                failed to get a convincing reply from the management and started 
                pelting stones at the institute's building. In fact, on March 
                3, soon after the violent protests at Sathyabama, Robin Vaas, 
                20, a third-year student of electrical and electronics engineering, 
                hanged himself at a relative's house. The reason behind the suicide 
                was not immediately clear. In contrast, the other affected institutes 
                in and outside of Tamil Nadu have largely been peaceful.  
               Profiting From Loopholes 
               What's the row about? Under the existing 
                regulations, a university can only be set up by a central or state 
                act. But a decade after India's independence, the government had 
                found out a way to speed up the spread of institutes of higher 
                education. In 1956, UGC passed an act allowing deemed universities 
                to come up. Deemed universities aren't actually universities (in 
                that they are not set up by a central or state act), but affiliated 
                to one, but independent for all practical purposes. They can set 
                up their own courses, and administer them with almost no interference. 
                There had always been fight between AICTE and the deemed universities 
                over the former's right to certify their technical courses. But 
                the Supreme Court sort of tipped the balance in favour of the 
                deemed universities, when it ruled in 2001 (in a fight between 
                Bharatidasan University and AICTE, although the former was a proper 
                university and not a deemed one) that they were exempt from AICTE 
                regulations. With the result, while just 29 deemed universities 
                came up between 1956 and 1990, in the 10 years to 2000, 26 of 
                them were notified as deemed universities. Between 2001 and 2005, 
                36 such universities came into being. 
              
                 
                    | 
                 
                 
                  |  
                     Uncertain future: Engineering classes at the troubled 
                      colleges are expected to resume later this month 
                   | 
                 
               
              Because the UGC Act allows the deemed universities 
                complete autonomy, some of them have turned themselves into a 
                money-making racket. In states such as Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and 
                Hyderabad, most of these technical colleges have a "management 
                quota" that allows them to admit students for a large capitation 
                fee (it can range between Rs 5 lakh and Rs 8 lakh). Given that 
                some of these colleges admit as many as 5,000 engineering students 
                a year, there's Rs 200 crore to be made in capitation fee alone. 
                No wonder, there's been a rush to get the deemed university status. 
                In the process, the quality of technical education at most of 
                these institutions has suffered-a primary reason behind the AICTE 
                crackdown. 
               With the AICTE saying that all institutions 
                would need their certification or lose the right to offer degrees 
                in technical courses, the choice for the deemed universities is 
                to either fall in line or give a BSc degree instead of, say, a 
                be or BTech degree. Of course, in the job market, a BSc degree 
                is far less valuable than a be degree. Says a former Vice Chancellor 
                of Anna University: "MNCs hiring engineers from here ask 
                for the AICTE approval, since they cannot be monitoring the quality 
                of hundreds of colleges.'' Confirms R. Chandrasekaran, Managing 
                Director, Cognizant Technology Solutions: "Cognizant has 
                historically recruited graduate engineers only from premier technical 
                universities and engineering colleges. We have never, and shall 
                not in future, recruit from engineering colleges that are not 
                bona fide, and do not issue legitimate degree certificates approved 
                by the AICTE."  
              
                 
                    | 
                    | 
                 
                 
                  |  
                     Paying the price: Computers and windows bore the 
                      brunt of students' ire at the SRM Institute 
                   | 
                 
               
              Getting Them To Submit 
               For the hundreds of technical students in 
                India's deemed universities that is the big worry. When BT went 
                to press, the chancellors of SRM, Sathyabama and Vellore Institute 
                of Technology had said that they would abide by UGC rules and 
                even allow AICTE inspection if the Madras High Court so ordered. 
                On March 15, at a Madras High Court hearing, the central government 
                informed the court that AICTE was empowered to lay down norms 
                for technical institutes, including those of deemed universities, 
                and that the AICTE had the right to inspect them. The counter 
                petition filed by the deemed universities had argued that the 
                AICTE could not take any arbitrary action, such as non-recognition 
                of courses, and must refer all matters to the UGC.  
               As for the troubled deemed universities in 
                Chennai, classes have commenced for the non-technical courses, 
                but the engineering courses will restart on the 21st of this month. 
                It's likely that the fight between the deemed universities and 
                the AICTE will not end here but reach the Supreme Court. When 
                it does, the apex court should simply put all technical courses 
                under the purview of the AICTE. The country's students don't deserve 
                to be short-changed.  
             |