|
Bandhs, agitations: Is globalisation
to blame? |
Karnataka
grinds to a halt over the Cauvery dispute. The Nandigram issue
paralyses West Bengal. Life comes to a halt in Assam following
the gunning down of migrant labourers from Bihar. Agitating farmers
shut down a national highway in Maharashtra. Normal life disturbed
as traders in Delhi down shutters.
Pick up any newspaper and you will come across one or more such
reports. Each of these issues has its own unique trigger but there
is also a common thread running through them. At their root lies
real or perceived threats to the livelihood of the agitators.
As the economic, social and cultural forces unleashed by economic
reforms and globalisation play themselves out, they turn existing
equations upside down and create new sets of haves and have-nots
(actually, they are creating more of the latter). And most of
these agitations and violent protests are seen as the backlash
from those sections that are feeling left out of the process of
wealth creation that is happening across the country.
M.V. Rajeev Gowda, Associate Professor of Economics and Social
Sciences at IIM Bangalore, says that this is the price democratic
societies have to pay during a transition phase. "Over the
last 15 years, we have moved from being a fairly closed society
to one that is integrating fast with the rest of the world. This
process has created a churn-and we are increasingly becoming a
winner-takes-it-all kind of society. The losers, naturally, are
feeling alienated. Growth is important, but it has to be seen
to be equitable for it to be acceptable to everyone."
T.S.R. Krishnamurthy, former Chief Election Commissioner, points
out that the benefits of economic development have been lopsided.
"It has brought a windfall for some and hopelessness for
others," he says. Arvind Kejriwal, founder of Parivartan,
which describes itself as a "citizen's movement," adds
that the social unrest is the result of an absence of any meaningful
participatory democracy and governance. "Who consulted poor
farmers before their lands were notified for SEZs? Is it, then,
any surprise that they resort to violence to retain their only
source of livelihood?"
THE CLASH TRIGGERS
A look at some of the issues that are
sparking social unrest. |
»
Globalisation is leading to stark differences
between winners and losers
» Many
people are unable to cope with the pace of change
» Awareness
and aspiration levels have increased »
Urbanisation is leading to greater stress
» Old
social support networks are collapsing; new ones haven't yet
come up
» Rapid
changes are seen as threats to cultural identities |
Globalisation has greatly benefitted knowledge workers and a
large section of the white-collar workforce in the manufacturing
and top-end services sectors, who comprise barely 25-30 per cent
of the country's population, and increased disparities between
this class and the rest of the country.
If one looks at history, it will be evident that this is not
a uniquely Indian phenomenon. Post-industrial revolution, England
faced a similar situation two centuries ago and successfully addressed
it. The Luddite Movement of the early 1800s, during which workers,
led by Ned Ludd, destroyed textile machinery in Nottinghamshire,
Yorkshire and Lancashire, which they felt were throwing workers
out of jobs, is a classic example of how rapid industrialisation
can disrupt a society in transition. At one point, British troops
fighting workers opposed to the Industrial Revolution outnumbered
those battling Napolean Bonaparte in the Iberian Peninsula. More
recently, countries such as Venezuela, Brazil and even China have
witnessed violent agitations over this issue.
N.R. Narayana Murthy, Chief Mentor and Chairman of Infosys,
says that while the progress made by the economy and business
over the last 10 years is outstanding, "we have taken our
eyes off the critical farm sector, which is the only source of
income for 65 per cent of Indians. We have to embrace compassionate
capitalism not only for inclusive growth but also to tackle the
socio-economic ills plaguing our society." More than half
of India's population is under the age of 25. Unless we evolve
steps to deliver them an equitable portion of the pie, the much
hyped demographic dividend could well turn into a demographic
disaster.
INSTAN
TIP
The fortnight's burning question.
ARE REAL ESTATE PRICES HEADED FOR A CORRECTION?
No. Kunal
Banerji, Vice President (Marketing), Ansal API
The general demand for real estate continues
to be healthy. There may, however, be pockets in which a correction
takes place. This is particularly likely in markets that have
overheated due to investors' expectations of quick returns.
Maybe. Anshuman
Magazine, MD, CB Richard Ellis, South Asia
It is difficult to predict real estate prices
in an immature, albeit rapidly growing market such as India. Due
to increased supplies, prices will come under pressure in certain
markets. However, prices will continue to rise in other pockets,
though at a lower rate than has been the case over the last two
years.
No. Kunal
Kakad, National Director, Colliers International India
The demand-supply mismatch in the Indian real estate
sector will start stabilising in the next six-to-eight months,
but we don't foresee any significant correction in prices during
this period. However, prices will fall in some micro-markets where
they have been driven up by speculative activity.
-Compiled by Kapil Bajaj
Q&A
"India has Archaic Labour Laws"
|
|
Caralee McLeish |
Sabine Hertveldt |
Sabine
Hertveldt and Caralee McLeish of the World
Bank have recently come out with a report on "Doing Business
in South Asia". Hertveldt discussed the report with BT's
Aman Malik over phone from Washington
D.C. Excerpts:
Despite being one of the fastest growing large economies,
India ranks quite low on your list. Why is it so tough to do business
in India?
It could be because we did not factor in most macro-economic
indicators. South Asia scores well only on two out of 10 indicators.
What are the specific reforms that South Asia must adopt
so as to make it significantly easier for people to do business?
South Asian countries have archaic labour laws. It is very difficult
to lay people off. Also, the legal process in India takes much
longer than in most other regions of the world. It must, however,
be said that individual Indian cities do follow best practices
in specific areas. If the country as a whole were to follow these,
its ranking would go up to #79 from #134 at present.
Your report concludes that it is easier to do business in
smaller cities than, say, in Mumbai or Kolkata. What explains
this?
In cities like Mumbai, it takes very long to resolve business
disputes. In smaller cities, disputes are more easily resolved
primarily because the volumes are much smaller.
Why
The Inflation Rate Is Rising
|
Unlike in the past,
when global crude oil prices were the main culprit, this time
around the run-up in inflation is due to food articles |
Call
it end-of-the-year blues. At the fag end of what has been a rollicking
year by all measures, inflation has reared its ugly head, scraping
close to 7 per cent, well above the RBI's and the government's
tolerance range of 5-5.5 per cent. Unlike in the past, when global
crude oil prices were the main culprit, this time around the run-up
in inflation is due to food articles. Prices of wheat, pulses,
milk, fruits and vegetables have all risen sharply over the past
few months.
Why? There is no single reason. Localised crop failures have
led to blips in prices of some commodities. Others have been pushed
up by more serious issues such as insufficient production to match
rising consumption, poor productivity and insufficient procurement
by government agencies. All these are conspiring to push up prices.
"The inflationary pressures (on food articles) have been
particularly acute this time due to supply side constraints which
are a combination of temporary and structural factors," says
Subir Gokarn, Executive Director and Chief Economist, CRISIL.
Is an inflation rate in the region of 7 per cent exceptionally
worrisome? Maybe not, if you look at the average decadal growth
in inflation over the past two decades, but it is a fact that
in recent times, India has got used to more benign inflation rates.
Galloping prices make bad political news, especially ahead of
elections in crucial states (read: Punjab and Uttar Pradesh).
The price to be paid is often heavy. The BJP was routed in Delhi
in the wake of the onion price rise in 1998. Ominously enough,
onion prices have more than doubled over the past month to over
Rs 20 per kg.
No wonder then, no efforts are being spared to douse the inflationary
fire. The government has cut fuel prices for the second time in
the last three months. Though not directly responsible for price
rise this time, the cut is expected to partially offset the rise
in prices of food articles. However, the ripple-effect will take
some time to make a tangible impact.
To cool agri-commodities, the government response has ranged
from curbing exports (at different times, it has clamped down
on exports of wheat, sugar and milk powder) to easing import duties
to even banning futures trading in select commodities.
Mostly fire-fighting measures, these efforts, too, are not likely
to have an immediate impact. Former Finance Minister Yashwant
Sinha points out that the supply side cannot be managed on a 15-day
notice or even on a month's notice. "We know from the experience
of onion and pulses in 1998 that there are no readily available,
exportable surpluses anywhere in the world that can be accessed
at such short notice," says Sinha. This is especially so
in case of crops such as pulses which are unique to India.
So, maybe, it is time to learn to live with higher inflation,
at least for the next few months. A better option would be to
use the trigger provided by higher inflation to fix some of the
systemic and structural issues related to Indian agriculture.
Maybe it is time to wipe the dust off the numerous reports on
agriculture and see what needs to be done there.
-Shalini S. Dagar
If
you Can't Fight Them, Join Them
|
Us calling: And India's responding |
A
few years ago, when us companies were moving jobs to India (and
slashing them at home), the phrase "Getting Bangalored"
became a pejorative term for losing one's job to a cheaper (and
often higher quality) engineer in India's Silicon Valley. However,
as Indian companies begin to expand their global footprint and
scale up their presence in the US, they are now creating new jobs
in that country. According to a ficci-Ernst & Young study,
the us attracted the highest share of Indian direct investment
($2.15 billion or Rs 9,460 crore) between 1995 and 2005, with
the much-maligned it industry leading investments into the country.
While India initially attracted foreign investment in its technology
and outsourcing sectors, global expansion plans by it firms such
as Infosys, TCS and Wipro, among others, are now beginning to
generate jobs in the US.
Overall, data from IBM-Plant Location International (PLI) indicates
that India has jumped three places from #10 to #7 in the list
of FDI-origin countries. "Investors come to the us for access
to the world's largest and most sophisticated consumer and business
markets, as well as for top-notch talent in areas like biotech.
This explains why the services, consumer goods, and pharmaceuticals
sectors, which are the heaviest users of it, are relatively more
successful than other us industries at attracting new investments,"
notes Navi Radjou, an analyst with Forrester Research, a Cambridge,
Massachusetts-based technology research agency. "These FDI
flows give an early indication of the specialised and synergistic
roles that India, China and the us will play in future,"
he adds.
Despite this apparent cooperation, points of friction remain.
IBM Plan Location International Co-leader Roel Spree argues that
"global competition for new jobs and capital investment is
increasing and developed and developing regions must continually
define and implement new strategies to attract investment".
Perhaps as a result of the changing dynamics of offshoring,
the clamour against it, which had reached a crescendo prior to
the last us presidential elections, is slowly petering out. There
is growing realisation that even as some us jobs are becoming
redundant, others are being created-some of them by the very Indian
companies that are accused of taking them away.
"The US' long-term prosperity lies in specialising in skills
that complement, not duplicate, Chindian talent," observes
Radjou. "We believe that the skills available in the us,
India and China are complimentary to each other and it's in India's
best interest to focus on its strengths of abundant, high-quality
and low-cost talent," adds T.V. Mohandas Pai, Director (HR),
Infosys.
-Rahul Sachitanand
MF
Segment: More Retail Investors
Retail investors are joining the
party on the bourses in droves. Says Sameer Kamdar, National Head
(MF), Mata Securities: "From a high of 80-85 per cent, the
institutional share in the mf industry has come down to 55-60
per cent." In some segments, retail investors have even ousted
institutional ones from their dominant positions. The equity segment
now accounts for 35-40 per cent of total assets under management
compared to 16 per cent three years ago. And retail investors
account for 90 per cent of this segment. Says a senior mf industry
executive: "Liquid funds and fixed maturity plans (which
make up 45-50 per cent of the mf industry's total corpus) are
still dominated by corporates. Secondly, most retail players are
not mature investors. Till they become more financially literate,
I don't see them dominating the market."
-Mahesh Nayak
|