|
BT DOTCOM: DIRECTORIES
How To Be A Good
Search-Engine Driver
They offer high visibility. but then,
just like the number of sites, there are a million ways to make it to the
top in search-engine listings. Some fair, others not so fair. A BT ride on
the web rails.
This
meeting is not clicking, methinks. Not at all. The 20-something owner of
an education site is intense and evangelistic about his upcoming portal.
Come to think of it, staring at second-round funding three months into the
business, I would be too. But mentally preparing for the long drive home,
I politely go through the motions: business model (interesting, but
possibly premature); revenue model (there, but somewhere in the future);
profits (firmly in the future)... and then, he leans to one side, and
smiles: ''We've done a lot of research on how to get top ranking on search
engines...'' Uhuh. Yet another search-engine buster.
Since search-engines first strode across
the Net space like juggernauts, this has been an unequal, continuing, and
enduring battle. At one corner, you have the people who run these
engines-the men and women who decide which sites get listed and in what
order. And, on the other, there are countless web-site developers
constantly trying to get one up by reconfiguring their own code to produce
better results for their sites.
Can the system be tweaked? Can a site
engineer to get a better ranking on a search engine? In the early days of
the world wide web, this was possible, and easy. Now, with close to a
billion pages indexed by search engines-estimates point to another billion
waiting in the wings-it's no walk in the park. Particularly, as
expectations are so, so high. ''Most companies would typically like to
come in the top three in the search-engine listings,'' says Vaiteeshwaran,
34, Veep, Fabmart.com. Adds Sankarson Banerjee, 30, Executive Director,
Indbazaar.com: ''Search-engines are a major source of traffic to the site,
so it is a very good idea to register, especially with the 10-15 major
ones.''
The bottomline: there aren't a web of
'engine secrets' to guarantee a top listing. There are, however, a number
of small changes a site developer can make to sometimes yield great
results.
Web-sites usually begin by registering at
search-engines, a necessary, but time-consuming process. Engines usually
take between 48 hours to six weeks to put up the site. It's fairly
automatic in machine-indexed engines such as Altavista.com, though in
human-indexed directories like Yahoo, editorial quality plays a major
role. A crucial factor lies in telling search-engines under what category
a site should be listed. Determining the right category is the key here.
For only then will the search-engines give a good ranking. Agrees Dhruv
Sharma 40, CEO, 123India.com: ''Protocol requires an objective approach to
the listing of the submission request.''
On that note, can one pay the engines to
speed up the process? It's expensive. For $199, a web-site can get a quick
answer from Yahoo.com and LookSmart.com. There's always the option of
outsourcing this process to sites like Submitexpress.com, which handle
everything-for a fee, of course. Is it necessary? Well, usually services
offered by search engines are free. Opines Mohana Pillai, 44, President,
Pacific Internet (India): ''You can do it free, but the chances are that
the site might not be listed.'' Why, one can buy a ranking at GoTo.com,
AltaVista.com, AskJeeves.com, and several other search engines.
Closely linked to categorisation of the
site are MetaTags, a place in the html code where information about the
page can be listed, as well as keywords describing the content of the
page. Search-engines use algorithms to search for MetaTags, on the basis
of which web-sites are thrown up during search results. For instance,
Fabmart's MetaTag for the music page is (as of today) 'India's finest
on-line music store'. There is, however, a lot of competition for single
words. ''There are million of sites talking about homework,'' laments
Apoorv Misra, 26, Chief Technology Officer, Classteacher.com.
That's when the game begins. The
search-engines keep on changing the relevance ratings based on MetaTags.
For example, if you search for a phrase of five words, web-sites with
MetaTags using all five words will be most relevant, those with four words
a little less relevant, and so on. But then, the sites also play their own
game. They also keep changing their MetaTags, frequently, based on the
feedback they get from surfers. It is important, however, for web-sites to
avoid search-engine spamming-repeating a keyword many times on a page.
Key Is The Word
Search-engine
busters |
Choose
the category for listing your site very carefully. Here lies the key |
Relevant
communication, and good content, will work with directory engines |
Keep
polishing the site's MetaTags, but don't even think of spamming |
Trace
the frequency and positioning of keywords to determine relevance |
There
are none that work all the time, across sites. Build a great site
instead |
But then, MetaTags are only part of the big
(search) picture. Pages with keywords appearing in the title are assumed
to be more relevant than others to the topic. How many times a keyword
appears in the document, in what locations, and in what format... all
contribute to the results of the search. For instance, some search-engines
look for keywords on the top of the page; others tend to look for how many
keywords appear through the page.
Then, some engines adopt the strategy of
linking popularity to grade sites, the assumption being that a page with
many links to it is probably well-regarded on the Net. Link-based
popularity is very important at the hot search site of the moment,
Google.com. For human-compiled indices, such as Yahoo.com, a strategy of
writing to the category editor to upgrade a site's ranking, backed by
suitable alterations in content and design, is a good idea.
To sum up, the search strategies vary from
one site to another. Remember that there is no one-size-fits-all model
here. Lycos, for instance, doesn't even consider MetaTags in its search
rating. Try selling a poor content site to a category editor at Yahoo.
Even creating dummy sites to link to the target site (to get on to
google.com) is a short-sighted strategy. By tweaking search
engines-through dubious means, I may add-a site runs the risk of getting
offloaded. Out of site, out of mind. No one fully knows the secret of the
search-indexing business. However, a popular site that gets a lot of
direct hits is known to work in this business.
-Aparna
Ramalingam
|