|
"Examine competency development and career management
for a long-term solution to the problem."
Dhruv Prakash, Practice
Leader (People Value Management), Hewitt Associates
|
For
the moment, Sood does not have much choice but to take charge of
the deal and salvage the transaction as well as the company's image.
However, to solve the problem of his high performers
constantly creating scenes for him to deal with, he has some work
to do. Work that would involve a serious look at a wide range of
issues from organisation structure to performance definition to
management of high posts and high performers.
Although internal competition may appear to
be due to personality issues, it has a lot to do with the organisational
context in which the players are made to perform. In this case,
Power Equipment seems to have adopted a product/customer matrix
structure. However, the roles do not seem to have been defined.
In the absence of such clarity, both Mathur
and Kumar will see each customer as an opportunity to pursue their
own agenda, one for product sale and the other to try and expand
the order potential even if it means competing with each other.
The customer, on the other hand, will see their company as a disorganised
supplier and become closed to system solutions that Power Equipment
may be able to provide for their mutual benefit.
In my opinion, Sood, as soon as he has dealt
with this deal, has to get on with the following:
- Examine the structure and clarify the role
definitions. If in doing so he realises that one of the two jobs
may not be large enough for either of them, he should transfer
one of them. It may be inconvenient so soon after the recent changes,
but is necessary.
- Call both of them individually for a chat,
where he should go over the performance expectation using the
latest incident and explore how the tensions between the two may
be defused. It may be a good idea to involve them in the above
exercise of role clarification and structure development.
- Examine the performance management, competency
development and career management of high performers to ensure
a long-term solution to this problem.
|
"Both executives
should demonstrate to Sood and their teams the values of teamwork
and mutual respect."
Himanshu Jani, Director (HR),
Asia-Pacific Agilent Technologies |
First
things first, and that's customer. Pranav Sood needs to have a retrieval
strategy to regain the confidence of Beta CEO, Ranjan Bhat to clinch
Power Equipment's credibility as a trusted, reliable preferred supplier.
He needs to immediately connect with Beta, apologise about the confusion,
and let him know that he is personally looking into the matter to
provide Beta with the best solution. Then, Sood needs to call both
Kumar and Mathur and let them know, in no uncertain terms, that
it's a situation of customer first, the interest of Power Equipment
second, and their personal glory the last. That this situation is
not only personally embarrassing for him, but damaging to the company's
reputation and business. Fortunately for Sood, he may have been
saved a complete credibility loss, as the base of both the quotations
was the same (costing source).
Since Kumar's quotation was more from a total
systems solutions perspective, and therefore higher at Rs 5 crore,
it would strategically make sense for Sood to depute Kumar to represent
the Power Equipment bid and then strip costs depending on the customer's
needs. However, the caveat would be that if they won the deal then
there would be quota-sharing for the purposes of both Kumar's and
Mathur's sales targets. This would substantiate the emphasis and
need for collaborative teamwork, and putting up one face to the
customer.
From a more long-term perspective, the organisation
structure and systemic issues of overlap between switchgears sales
and institutional sales would need to be addressed.
Increasingly, many companies structure their
sales and marketing functions such that there is product-line focus
and institutional focus. The underlying premise of such structures
is better service and solutions for customers, and order maximisation.
In the case of Power Equipment, the systems, processes, communication
methodology, quota credit-sharing, collaborative teaming and one
face to the customer are issues that possibly have not been addressed
up front. This could have led to the resultant ambiguity and crisis.
These critical areas need to be unequivocally recognised, clarified
and agreed to by both the general managers and signed off.
Sood, as the CEO, would need to articulate
this and ask Mathur and Kumar to resolve these issues mutually and
submit a blueprint of their operating principles. And to gauge the
effectiveness of the implementation of the operating principles
document, key performance objectives for Mathur and Kumar should
be clearly defined and periodically reviewed.
Sood would also need to tell them explicitly
that while he values both of them as high performers, business embarrassments,
as in the Beta case, are unacceptable. Sood needs to communicate
that he expects them to get their act together and demonstrate visibly
to him and their teams the fundamental values of teamwork, and mutual
respect.
Since the intrinsic personal chemistry between
these two star executives appears to have been vitiated for some
time, it may be prudent for Sood to either get a highly-skilled
internal organisation development consultant to work on the systemic
and team collaborative issues or invest in hiring an appropriate
external consultant to work with them. The consequences of such
resolution would benefit even the respective teams of the two general
managers.
Reward and recognition programmes for inter-group
teamwork and objective achievements across boundaries would actively
promote this and also compel the leaders to walk the talk. A personal
development objective for Mathur and Kumar would be to become champions
of organisation team work and showcase, in top management meetings,
the best practices of collaborative teaming. They could also attend
seminars on the subject to augment their leadership sensitivity.
In today's war for talent, Sood would surely
recognise that retaining and motivating top talent needs CEO sponsorship,
prioritisation, and immediate resolution.
|
"Sood should make
Kumar and Mathur negotiate expectations so that they stay committed
to what they have agreed upon"
Dr Shakuntala David, Management
trainer and consultant |
Sood's priority
should be to sort out the "confusion" at Beta Auto. His
next step should be to resolve the conflicts that Nitin Kumar and
Rakesh Mathur seem to keep having. To find out the reasons for the
conflicts, Sood should talk to them separately. He should spell
out clearly the negative impact their behaviour is having on the
environment of the organisation and customer relationship.
I would imagine that these high-performers
are inherently competitive, so some amount of rivalry between them
is understandable and, indeed, desirable. I also see a larger organisational
issue that CEO Sood has to deal with-the organisational structure.
In its current form, it offers a lot of scope for conflict.
When Sood sits down with the two star performers,
he's likely to discover that the core issues are a feeling of hurt
and a lack of clarity in roles. Mathur, as the General Manager for
switchgears, is often on a collision course with Kumar, whose responsibility
as an institutional marketer is to maximise revenues via customer
"solutions".
Most of Power Equipment's current problems
would be solved once the two executives are able to address their
personality issues and their roles are clarified. Ergo, Sood should
help the two air their grievances, sort out differences, and then
identify their exact roles.
His next step should be to make them negotiate
expectations from each other, so that they stay committed to what
they have agreed upon. Finally, a periodic review of the changes
in structure and roles needs to be done. Sood is fortunate to have
two hyper-competitive executives working for him. Instead of losing
them to conflicts, he should help them resolve their differences
for performance enhancement and growth.
|