JUNE 23, 2002
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 60 Minutes
 Personal Finance
 Managing
 Case Game
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Watching I-flex IPO
A host of IPO-wannabes-including Tata Consultancy Services, Maruti Udyog, and Hyundai Motor India-is going to be watching the I-flex public offering closely. The issue, due in June first week, will indicate the moribund primary market's appetite for new stocks, and the small investor's willingness to return to IPOs.


Saving UTI
It's bail out time again at UTI. With two of its monthly income plans maturing in July, it needs find Rs 2,400 crore-and fast.

More Net Specials
Business Today, June 9, 2002
 
 
The World Is Ours To Lose
The world awaits our software products. But do we have any to sell?

It's a Friday evening in Los Angeles as I sit writing this. I am exhausted-having just completed my twenty-fourth meeting in three days. That is not a typo, two dozen meetings so far and more tomorrow. And with that exhaustion is a certain elation.

Because more than a dozen of these may very likely result in business for a company I have an interest in. Three days where no one we met said "No".

I sit here thinking-here's another nail in the coffin for that old adage that you need lots of money to get business globally. The cost of this exercise basically included lots of e-mail to set up meetings, two round-trip air tickets, a few nights at a cheap-that too desi-owned if you please-hotel, and a few hundred dollars to be at a trade show. Around a lakh of rupees perhaps.

  Going By The Book
 
  Sports, Organisations, And Free Markets  
  Don't Be A Control Freak  
  Rough It Our  

What's been surprising was not so much the questions asked of us-though those were piercing enough. We had prepared loads of presentations, references, demos. That, strangely enough, we were never asked to strut out. Not once.

A couple of times, when I offered to show the laboriously put together powerpoints, I got the same smiling answer-''Oh, we know Indian companies. We know you guys can do software.''

Never mind we were presenting products, not services, and that too at market prices, not labour arbitrage. The brand "Indian software" is right up there, and its right out there too. In the minds of buyers as far apart as Ireland, Israel, and Indiana.

Dear Mr Narayanamurthy, Mr Premji, thank you for bringing us here. Dear rest of us, now is the time to ride these coat-tails. Before the rampant price-crashing on services tarnishes this image too.

If you have the products, take it to a trade show out there-meet with potential buyers and distributors-and if your stuff is special enough, you will quickly see yourself being wooed by potential partners. Perhaps even acquirers-we had three unsolicited offers of investment in these three days.

The question I come back to is this: do we as a country have the products to take out globally? I am afraid I do not see too much in the pipeline.

Nasscom released its report a few weeks ago, gloating that the Indian it services business grew by 22 per cent last year. Strip the dollar inflation out of that and you're talking of an industry growing by the mid-teens in percentage terms. Am I wrong? Aren't our cement and consumer durables industries growing faster?

Should this anaemic growth rate not be a wake-up call that we need to move to the more lucrative part of the business-from the back-office to the front-end?

Our ability to build good stuff is not perceived to be in doubt. Not by our potential customers at least. So are we the only people in the world who believe that we can't build good software products?

Many people we met asked about the war situation in India. Forget Bush, Vajpayee, Musharraf and our government's inability to do pr for itself in the political world-this lot of buyers is completely on our side. I certainly don't see a Pakistani company getting the kind of reception we did.

A friend once asked a big shot at Infosys why they didn't consider building a product brand. ''Oh, because it takes $200 million,'' he was told. Another VC repeated this same mythical number to me. With all due respect gentlemen, that is utter balderdash.

It may take $200 million over five years, or even 10. It might take even more money. But you would have turned much more in revenues from your product over this period, and you would only have spent this amount from your accruals. Are you seriously suggesting that each successful software product company in the world started with $200 million in the bank?

It is not that the world now has a level playing field for us to be on. That field is actually tilted in our favour. Are we going to fritter away this advantage too?


Mahesh Murthy, an angel investor, heads Passionfund. He earlier ran Channel V and, before that, helped launch Yahoo! and Amazon at a Valley-based interactive marketing firm. Reach him at Mahesh@passionfund.com.

 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | 60 MINUTES | PERSONAL FINANCE
MANAGING | CASE GAME | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BESTEMPLOYERSINDIA

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | COMPUTERS TODAY | THE NEWSPAPER TODAY 
ARCHIVESTNT ASTROCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY