JULY 7, 2002
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 Automotive
 Personal Finance
 Managing
 Case Game
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Nasscom Does Some Brain Racking
Slowdown or not, NASSCOM is still eyeing Indian software revenues of $77 billion by 2008. Just what will make it happen? To get a strategy together, it got some top minds to meet in Hyderabad at the India it and ITEs Strategy Summit 2002. A report on what came of it.


Q&A With Ashraf Dimitri
The CEO of Oasis Technology, a key provider of e-payments software, tries to win over converts to a new system.

More Net Specials
Business Today, June 23, 2002
 
 
Going By The Book
Rules passed through government notifications may be challenged if they are beyond the scope prescribed by the enabling statute or if they violate the Constitution.

What is the validity of the rules that are passed from time to time by the government by way of notifications under specific enactments?

  Nation, Corporation And Marxian Reservations
 
  Researched To Death  
  The Ripple Effect Of Enthusiasm  

Notifications and rules (Rules) issued by the government under specific enactments are a form of subordinate/delegated legislation. It is settled law that subordinate/delegated legislation have constitutional and statutory sanction, and Rules issued under statutes have the effect of the statute. In terms of Article 13(3)(a) of the Constitution of India, the expression "law" includes rules and notifications having the force of law in India.

Rules have constitutional and statutory sanction provided they are introduced by the government strictly within the rule-making authority conferred by the enabling statute. Rules are subject to judicial review and may be challenged if they are substantive ultra vires, i.e., beyond the scope prescribed by the enabling statute or if they violate the provisions of the Constitution or existing laws, for example, where the Rules seek retrospective effect while the enabling statute has not conferred such powers on the government. Rules may also be challenged to be procedural ultra vires, i.e., where they fail to comply with procedural requirements prescribed by the enabling statute or general law, for example, where the Rules are required to be drafted in consultation with the public and/or an expert committee constituted under the enabling statute and the Rules are not so drafted.

In addition, Rules should be published in the Official Gazette and any other publication (like local newspaper) as prescribed by the enabling statute. Therefore, Rules passed by the government in compliance with prescribed conditions have the sanction and binding force of law from the date specified in the publication. The government, however, can withdraw its previous Rules in public interest.

We provided a bank guarantee to a Central Government department and though the purpose and period for which the guarantee was provided has expired, the department concerned has not returned the original guarantee as yet. Consequently, our bank is not returning the margin money to us, as according to it, as long as the original guarantee is not returned to it, it must keep the guarantee alive in its books as a liability. Please advise.

It is the practice of banks to keep the guarantee amount alive in their books as a liability until the bank's liability under the guarantee is "discharged" on return/surrender of the original guarantee. However, with respect to a guarantee given in favour of the government, even if the guarantee is returned, the government's rights to sue under the guarantee would, in terms of the Limitation Act, 1963, subsist for 30 years from (i) when the breach of contract of guarantee occurred, or (ii) where there are successive breaches, when the breach in respect of which the suit is instituted occurred, or (iii) where the breach is continuing, when it ceases, unless the government has expressly discharged the bank from its guarantee liability.

Most guarantees usually state the date or event on which the bank stands "discharged from all liabilities under the guarantee", whether or not the guarantee is returned to the bank by the beneficiary. If your bank's guarantee contains such a provision discharging the bank from liability, your bank should not keep the guarantee amount alive in its books. You may bring such provision to the notice of the bank and explain that in your case, the government has discharged the bank from all liabilities with effect from the relevant date or event. Consequently, the government cannot attach any liability to the bank on the basis of the guarantee, even if it sues the bank.

In case the guarantee does not discharge the bank from liability, the bank may not return your margin money unless you obtain an unconditional written discharge from liability for your bank from the government.


The views expressed here should not be construed as legal opinion and is for reference only. Business Today and/or the author will not be responsible for any decision taken by readers on the basis of these views. Please send in your queries to Legal.bt@intoday.com or Going By the Book, c/o Business Today, F-26, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001.

 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | AUTOMOTIVE | PERSONAL FINANCE
MANAGING | CASE GAME | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BESTEMPLOYERSINDIA

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | COMPUTERS TODAY | THE NEWSPAPER TODAY 
ARCHIVESTNT ASTROCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY