OCT. 27, 2002
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 BT Event
 Personal Finance
 Managing
 Case Game
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Who's Fitter,
Who's Fittest

Want to know what CEO's like Anil Ambani of Reliance or Ratan Tata of the Tata Group do to stay fighting fit? Click here. Plus: An exclusive seven-day CEO fitness regimen from Gold's Gym in Mumbai.


The 800 Rolls On
For a product dismissed for being too 'underpowered' to stick it out in the competitive era, the A-segment Maruti 800 is doing remarkably well. Yes, for a while it did look as though it would be the moped of four-wheelers, with B-segment cars assuming the 'minimum requirement' tag. But the 800 is the 800. It still sells.

More Net Specials
Business Today,  October 13, 2002
 
 
Going By The Book
Under the criminal action for defamation, the author, editor and publisher of the newspaper may be held liable under the Indian Penal Code for imprisonment upto two years and fine.

We are a FMCG company and have recently obtained an interim injunction order restraining misuse of our trademark by a local manufacturer. Can we publicise the court action/injunction? Concerning another likely action for misuse of our trademark, could you please advise on admissibility in law suits of trap orders placed by decoy customers.

You can publicise the court order by referring to it in circulars/letters or by publishing a warning notice in newspapers highlighting the effect of the injunction order, i.e., restraint of misuse of your trademark. However, you must ensure that the publication does not include any statement that misrepresents the court order, discusses the merits of the legal action or has the effect of prejudicing fair trial in the pending court action, as such publication may be held objectionable as contempt of court or as impeding legal rights of the other party to a fair trial and/or to present witnesses.

  The Market Lies Elsewhere  
  An Idea Of A Gem  
  Put A 'Buy' On Talent  

Trap orders are admissible in law suits, since they are recognised as the only probable means of collecting evidence against the infringer in most trademark infringement matters. Courts generally admit trap orders in evidence only after careful scrutiny and satisfaction of correctness of such orders and their surrounding circumstances. Therefore, for better chances of admission of trap orders by courts, you should arrange a written order on the infringer and obtain documentary evidence of sale of spurious products by the infringer, such as a pro forma invoice on the printed letterhead or invoice book. Also, avoid any ambiguity in the trap order, as the court may not admit an ambiguous and unclear trap order. It is also necessary for admissibility that the trap order is presented to the court for admission within a reasonable time of placing it on the infringer, so that the court may provide to the infringer his legal right to defend admission of the trap order in evidence. Further, the trap order should not be so lucrative that it could induce, not only the infringer, but any reasonable man. In other words, the trap order should be comparable to orders regularly handled by the infringer.

A daily newspaper has published a defamatory article about the financial position and business practices of our company. How do we initiate legal action against the author and the publication?

Defamation constitutes both civil and criminal wrong, and consequently the author and the newspaper publishing the defamatory article may be held liable for defamation.

In cases of companies, imputations attacking their reputation, affairs, business, trade or financial position are held defamatory, and therefore your company can initiate both, civil proceedings claiming damages for defamation from the author and the newspaper as well as criminal proceedings seeking punishment of the author of the news article, the publisher and the editor of the newspaper (whose name appears on the newspaper under the provisions of the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867) for committing the offence of defamation.

Under the criminal action for defamation, the author, editor and/or publisher of the newspaper may be held liable under the Indian Penal Code for imprisonment upto two years and/or fine. In addition, under civil action for damages for defamation, the newspaper as well as the author may be held liable to pay you damages, the quantum of which will primarily depend on the gravity of defamation. Legal action against authors and newspapers for defamation may be held unsustainable if the imputation alleged is true, is published by the newspaper in public interest and in good faith. So, before initiating any legal action, please ensure that in your case the above defenses are not available to the author or newspaper. Alternatively, you may also ask the newspaper to retract the news article.


The views expressed here should not be construed as legal opinion and are for reference only. Business Today and/or the author will not be responsible for any decision taken by readers on the basis of these views. Please send in your queries to Legal.bt@intoday.com or Going By The Book, c/o Business Today, Videocon Tower, 5th Floor, E-1, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi-110055.

 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | BT EVENT | PERSONAL FINANCE
MANAGING | CASE GAME | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BESTEMPLOYERSINDIA

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | SMART INC | THE NEWSPAPER TODAY 
ARCHIVESTNT ASTROCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY