|   Our company manufactures stationery goods using 
              a trademark since 2000. The trademark is pending registration. We 
              recently served a notice on a firm that manufactures stationery 
              goods under a trademark closely resembling ours, asking it to desist 
              from misusing our trademark. The firm has disputed our rights and 
              has asserted its exclusive rights on the trademark claiming prior 
              adoption and use since 1999. We intend to sue the firm for trademark 
              misuse. Can we simultaneously initiate both civil and criminal proceedings 
              against the firm for misusing our trademark? If not, which option 
              is more expedient and effective? In another case of misuse of our 
              trademark, we have been unable to trace the infringer. Can we file 
              proceedings against an unknown party?  Your company can initiate both, civil proceedings 
              to restrain the firm from misusing your trademark as well as criminal 
              proceedings to punish representatives of the firm for misuse of 
              your trademark. However, the appropriate forum for adjudication 
              of a bona fide dispute between parties over their right to use a 
              trademark is the Civil Court and not a Criminal Court. Accordingly, 
              if in criminal proceedings the Magistrate finds a bona fide dispute 
              between the parties over their right to use a trademark, the Magistrate 
              may not continue to hear the matter and may ask the complainant 
              to first establish its rights over the trademark in the Civil Court. 
              In case the Civil Court determines that the accused is counterfeiting 
              the trademark, the criminal case may be revived or instituted and 
              the accused punished.   If, based on the averments of the firm in the 
              criminal proceedings, the Magistrate forms an opinion that a bona 
              fide dispute concerning the right to use the trademark exists and 
              stays the criminal proceedings, you will need to fall back on the 
              civil proceedings to establish your right on such trademark. Therefore, 
              it is essential to initiate civil proceedings against the firm in 
              addition to the criminal proceedings.  As regards your second query, a criminal complaint 
              is maintainable against unknown infringers and you can seek directions 
              from the Magistrate for the police to investigate the case, including 
              ascertaining the particulars of the infringers. However, a civil 
              suit will not be maintainable against unknown parties.   We intend to wind up our joint venture 
              company as a management deadlock has arisen resulting in losses. 
              As per the joint venture agreement, disputes with our 50 per cent 
              partner in the venture are subject to resolution by arbitration. 
              Our partner is unwilling to wind up the joint venture company. Can 
              we initiate arbitration and request the arbitrator to wind up the 
              joint venture company?   Winding up is a statutory remedy and the power 
              to wind up a company is conferred only on the court. An arbitrator 
              is not competent or empowered to decide on issues that are the subject 
              matter of decision by the court and therefore will not be competent 
              to order winding up of the joint venture company.   You will therefore need to petition the court 
              for winding up of the joint venture company. You may seek winding 
              up on the ground that due to the deadlock, the joint venture company 
              has lost its substratum and it will be just and equitable to wind 
              it up. However, your partner may argue that the deadlock can be 
              resolved through arbitration in terms of your joint venture agreement 
              and the joint venture company can thus continue operations. In that 
              event, you will need to satisfy the court on the impossibility to 
              continue the joint venture company's business even if the deadlock 
              is resolved on reasons such as loss of the joint venture company's 
              substratum, irreparable breakdown of relationship and loss of confidence 
              between the joint venture partners. The court may otherwise refuse 
              an order to wind up the joint venture company and direct you to 
              resolve the deadlock through arbitration and attempt to revive the 
              joint venture company. 
  The views expressed here should not be construed 
              as legal opinion and are for reference only. Business Today and/or 
              the author will not be responsible for any decision taken by readers 
              on the basis of these views. Please send in your queries to Legal.bt@intoday.com 
              or Going By The Book, c/o Business Today, Videocon Tower, 5th Floor, 
              E-1, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi-110055. |