|
Bill
baiters we're not. Actually, for the record, we don't bait anyone
although we did observe, at the time of Bill Gates' visit to India
in November last, that the four-day road show was inspired in part,
a very large one, by his desire to convince more people to buy into
the Microsoft way. The timing of the world's richest man's visit
couldn't have been more appropriate: circa 2003, everything seems
to be coming together for Linux. In February, Intel and Silicon
Graphics held a meeting in Delhi to demonstrate what they termed
"the previously inconceivable" capabilities of Linux. In reality,
the occasion was just a product launch-of a family of servers called
Altix 3000, a combination of Silicon Graphic's supercomputing architecture,
Intel's 64-bit Itanium 2 processors, and Linux, an achievement of
sorts since the best-known member of the open source genus was an
unproven quantity in its ability to operate in 64-bit computing
environments. Linux, evidently, is catching on fast in the areas
of technical- and high-performance computing. "High-power computing
has very special needs," says Narendra Bhandari, Regional Manager
(Asia Pacific), Strategic Relations, Intel. "Linux is especially
suited for that."
Intel isn't the only convert. From IBM, an early champion, to h-p
to Oracle, most technology companies are hedging their bets with
Linux initiatives. "The value proposition Linux offers our
customers is extremely compelling," explains Murli Subramanian,
Vice President (E-business Development), India Operations, Oracle.
"It drives down their total cost of ownership-more than 25
per cent of the work we do in our development centre is Linux-oriented."
Market intelligence firm IDC predicts that Linux will become the
most-used operating system in the world by 2004. Analysts suggest
it could have as much as a 30 per cent share of the server market
in India, but those numbers aren't backed by any credible studies.
And Linux still hasn't managed to establish itself in the mission-critical
database-server market or the so-vast-growth-rates-don't-matter
desktop one. It is largely present in the file- and print-server
markets, although Linux activists believe, and would have everyone
else believe, that the operating system can do well nigh everything.
"What isn't possible with Linux?" asks Sachin Dalbir,
Head (Enterprise Sales), Red Hat. Actually, we can think of some-like
high-end SMP. Symmetric MultiProcessing, for the benefit of the
uninitiated, is a computer architecture where multiple CPUs (Central
Processing Units) work on individual tasks simultaneously. This
increases the speed of computing exponentially. Both Unix and Windows
NT support SMP. Still, that doesn't change the fact that infotech
users are looking at Linux seriously. "Most Linux initiatives
are in the pilot phase," says Sunil Mehta, a Vice President
at Nasscom, India's association of software companies, "but
many large companies are looking to implement the operating system
in the long-term- cost-benefits are the big lure."
Linux Lives
A clutch of technology heavies has things
going on with the OS. |
H-P is working on making Unix and Linux more
compatible, and is engaged in Linux-related work in the application
server and development tools spaces.
Silicon Graphics has just launched a range of high performance
machines using Intel's Itanium 2 chip with Linux as the operating
system.
Oracle's key offerings are available in Linux-versions in
India. It is using the operating system to develop low-cost
enterprise class solutions.
Pramati is promoting the concept of developing components
on the Linux platform; it is positioning the operating system
as a high-performance, mission-critical, low-cost alternative.
IBM is developing standards and embedded software for open
source, and also provides middleware and enterprise class
solutions built around Linux.
Veritas has launched Linux products including a cluster
server, clustering software solution, and Veritas Servpoint
NAS.
C-DAC will be using a Linux platform customised by IBM to
work on projects in the area of Hindi speech recognition,
weather forecasting, and grid computing.
|
Linux vendors such as Red Hat, SuSE, Furblinux,
and VALinux have been quick to spot the opportunity. Red Hat, for
instance, is working with National Informatics Centre (NIC), the
various Indian Institutes of Technology, and National Centre for
Software Technology to develop applications built around Linux.
While vendors have had limited (but growing)
success with corporates, they have managed to convince constituents
of India's administrative machinery that open source is the way
to go. The governments of states such as Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu,
Karnataka, Kerala, and Maharashtra have either decided on, or are
considering Linux as the operating system for their e-governance
projects. And others like the Supreme Court, NIC, and the Directorate
of Estates are testing the waters with Linux initiatives. "The
source code is available to all," says Raj Mathur, an active
member of India Linux Users Group, Delhi, or Linux-Delhi as it is
popularly known. "Users can customise it to suit their own
unique needs." And the cost makes it attractive to small enterprises-Linux
can run web-servers and mail-servers, things that could otherwise
be well beyond the means of most SMEs. That and the possible success
of various language-computing experiments built around Linux (See
Vern Version on page 80 of this issue) could take computing to the
masses, making it imperative, and profitable, for hardware manufacturers,
application builders, companies, and service providers (the government
included) to adopt the operating system. After all the hype, the
Penguin may have finally learnt to fly.
-Vinod Mahanta
RIVERWORLD
Joining The Dots
All you wanted to know about the Grand Canal
Project.
|
Former Minister Suresh Prabhu: The PM's
choice to run the project |
The Objective: To
link 35 rivers by 2016.
The Cost: In excess of Rs 5,60,000 crores;
for the record, the top 500 companies on Bombay Stock Exchange had
a market capitalisation of Rs 5,56,706 crore on February 17.
Source of Capital: Infrastructure bonds; user
charges on use of wasteland converted into agricultural land; commercial
participation-navigation rights and hydroelectricity generation.
Benefits: Savings on future flood-relief
expenditure; creation of effective waterways; increase in the volume
of land under cultivation; generation of 30,000 MW; a 4-5 per cent
boost to GDP through the indirect route of providing a fillip to
manufacturing, services, and agriculture.
Panels set up under the National Water Development
Agency to accelerate the project: Financial Issues; Social Issues;
Awareness Issues; Ecological Issues; International Issues (water
sharing with Nepal and Bhutan); Technical Issues; Technological
Issues; Legal Issues; Organisational Issues (the Indian Institutes
of Management are working on special purpose vehicles to implement
the project).
Total Number of People to Be Employed: 1,000;
the rest will be hired on contract.
-Moinak Mitra
GROUNDED
Who Killed Airline Privatisation?
Yes, the disinvestment of Indian Airlines and
Air India do seem to be off.
At one time, a
possible answer to that question would have been India's private
airlines that fear competition. Now, it could be, a strand of convoluted
bureaucratic logic. Union Disinvestment Minister Arun Shourie has
long wanted to privatise Air India and Indian Airlines, and he doesn't
mind if the Ministry of Civil Aviation does what is needed to make
the two airlines profitable (after all, that would increase their
valuation). Union Civil Aviation Minister Syed Shahnawaz Hussain,
young and eager to prove himself, would like to do just that-turn
the two airlines around. There's the small matter of the Rs 30,000
crore he needs to refurbish the fleets. But the finance ministry
is against spending that amount on companies that will soon be privatised.
And so, Hussain has written the Cabinet asking that the two airlines
be taken off the disinvestment bill of fare. Ironically, even if
the finance ministry were to withdraw its objections to the investment,
potential suitors are certain to shun the airlines-they will now
carry more debt on their balance sheets. Either way, it is the disinvestment
process that suffers.
-Ashish Gupta
ALLIANCE
Taking Aim
Magazine publishers get together to
further their own cause.
Did
you know that nearly 40 per cent (18.5 million) of total print circulation
in India is accounted for by magazines? Or that with a readership
of 86.2 million, magazines almost equal (48 per cent) newspapers
in terms of readership? If you didn't, you aren't the only one.
Even the government, especially the Directorate of Advertising &
Visual Publicity (DAVP) does not recognise magazines when it comes
to releasing statutory advertisements.
Obviously, magazine publishers want their due
recognition. With that in mind, eight such publishing groups-including
that of India Today, The Outlook, Business India, Cybermedia, Delhi
Press, Ananda Vikatan, Chitralekha and Meri Saheli-joined hands
on February 25 to launch the Association of Indian Magazines (aim).
The association promises to be the industry's voice, be it in promoting
readership, advertising, or lobbying.
MR RELIANCE
Gurumurthy Redux
The long-time Reliance investigator grabs the
headlines with a missive to the Finance Minister on Reliance's misdeeds.
I would
never have got into investigating Reliance Group but for the fact
that there is today not a single newspaper or magazine, which would
publish anything against this group. Not a single political party
or leader who would expose their misdeeds. Not a single official
who would conduct a fair and fearless investigation against them.
Post Script to letter written by
S. Gurumurthy to Jaswant Singh on January 13.
|
SJM Co-convenor Gurumurthy: Friend of
Reliance |
The late Dhirubhai
Ambani had a term for people who worked against the interests of
Reliance Industries-he called them Friends of Reliance. That 53-year-old
Chennai-based chartered accountant Swaminathan Gurumurthy remains
foremost among Friends of Reliance was evident from two letters
he wrote Finance Minister Jaswant Singh, a detailed note on January
11, 2003, and a summary version of the same two days later. The
letters refer to the December 1992 issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures
entitling 34 companies to a 11 per cent equity holding in RIL at
the price of Rs 31 a share. Gurumurthy's claims that the 34 corporates
are shell companies controlled by the Ambanis and that the issue
is one of 'fraudulent preferential allotment' are being investigated
by India's securities watchdog SEBI and the Department of Company
Affairs (DCA).
It was as an investigative journalist that
Gurumurthy first made news; from 1986 onwards, as the then corporate
advisor to the late Ramnath Goenka, Chairman of Indian Express Group,
he authored some 50 articles on Reliance's corporate tactics. The
man has tilted at other windmills-he, and then Indian Express editor
and now Union Disinvestment, it, and Communication Minister Arun
Shourie, launched the investigation into the Bofors kickback, and
he has waged a long drawn-out battle against the Maharashtra Government
for signing a MoU with Enron -but Reliance remains his favourite
cause. Now the Co-convenor of Swadeshi Jagran Manch, a think-tank
loosely allied with the BJP that propagates a message of economic
nationalism, Gurumurthy has come up against one-time friend Shourie
with his opposition to the disinvestment process. "We are not
against disinvestment per se," he qualifies. "We are just
cautioning the government that it should not result in private monopolies.
This has happened in the case of Reliance and IPCL." There's
that R-word again.
-Ashish Gupta
|
Taking Guard: A flop show |
STUMPED
Analyse
This
ESPN-Star's flanking fails.
ESPN-Star considers
its team of six cricket commentators-Sunil Gavaskar, Harsha Bhogle,
Geoffrey Boycott, Alan Wilkins, Ravi Shastri, and Navjot Singh Sidhu-unbeatable.
In reality, the six have been trounced by a verbose Charu Sharma,
his comrade-in-arms Mandira Bedi, and a clutch of boring cricketing
has-beens.
Manu Sawhney, the Managing Director of ESPN
Software India, had set a fairly straightforward target for the
channel's pre- and post-match analysis. "Even if we were to
get average channel ratings (0.3-0.4) at a time when the World Cup
is on a competing network, it will prove our equity with the discernible
cricket viewer."
The ratings are out now and it is clear that
the channel's strategy has flopped. Taking Guard and Follow Through,
its pre- and post-match analysis sessions have lost out (and how)
to set Max's Extraaa Innings. "It is a case of pure studio-based
analysis against action in and around the playing field," says
Sandeep Vij, Head, Optimum Media Solutions. Devoid of replays, capsules
on best catches and shots, and the atmospherics (ESPN Star can't
show anything at all), there is little reason for the cricket enthusiast
to zap to ESPN-Star Sports on the remote.
-Shailesh Dobhal
|