JULY 20, 2003
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 At Work
 Personal Finance
 Managing
 Case Game
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Q&A: Jan P. Oosterveld
Meet a Dutch engineer who describes his company as "too old, too male and too Dutch". This is Jan P. Oosterveld, 59, Member, Group Management Committee & CEO (Asia Pacific), Royal Philips Electronics, a $31.8-billion company going through tough times. His mission is to turn Philips market agile and global in outlook.


Bio-dynamic Tea Estate
Is there a way to rejuvenate tea consumption? Rajah Banerjee, the idiosyncratic owner of the 1,500-acre Makai Bari tea estate, among India's largest, thinks he has the answer to the industry's woes: value-added tea. 'Bio-dynamic' tea, to use his phrase. Here's a look at some of his organic and flavoured tea experiments.

More Net Specials
Business Today,  July 6, 2003
 
 
Bollywood Tragedy
What the Indian film industry needs now is a new kind of formula film.

One of the doyens of the Indian film industry was telling me that the mood is suddenly better there. A few films such as Bhoot and Chalte Chalte have at least broken even, and people are beginning to smile again. Money is slowly coming out again. People are funding films again-albeit very slowly.

   
   
   
   

He said the drought of the last few years was the worst he had seen in his 50-odd years in the business. And we both were not sure how long this turnaround would last. We spoke about growing corporatisation-and of getting more professional funding into films and agreed that it was still far off.

I had spoken on these issues at an industry conference called frames, where my disappointing conclusion was that any sensible investor would stay far away from the industry. This isn't because the industry has dirty money in it-that it does-but because it simply isn't structured for an investor to get fair returns.

The first thing to realise about our film business is that the true risk-takers or entrepreneurs are not the producers or directors. They are the distributors. Here's what typically happens: producers put together short-term borrowed funds, then directors and actors make a film. They immediately turn around and sell it to the distributors. So all the money to be made by the 'promoters' happens before the film is released. True investors don't like this.

Distributors take the risk if the film flops and the reward if it succeeds. If they don't buy a film, it dies in the film can. In effect, distributors determine what types of films get made. Distributors have built their own thumb-rules over time. A Shah Rukh film is worth paying Rs X for, a Salman film Y, Rahman's music is worth Z and so on. A sexy 'item number' adds a little more.

So, sadly, this is how films get announced. A producer understands the formula, signs up a few distributor-friendly stars and music directors and says he's making a film. Nobody really cares about the story, plot, characterisation. It's just film-making by Lego. Songs are shot in different locales and stages of undress around the world. The ensuing hotch-potch is then launched into theaters.

The only non-cooperator in this chain, of late, has been the audience, that has been staying away in droves. With the exception of Raaz, no film has supposedly broken even in the last few years. No, not Devdas or Saathiya, which highlights a different problem-large-scale lying about performance.

All aspiring film-makers tell me that the audience wants films that are 'zara hat ke'. Everyone has a great story she wants to shoot. I can't agree more. But the hurdle is distribution-if the film doesn't get picked up at all, the effort goes to zero-and believe me, I've seen enough good films lying in cans that haven't made it to the screens at all.

There are a couple of ways out. One is to pay your dues and build yourself a stature where stars agree to work for you for less, and distributors are willing to buy whatever you produce. One man has mastered this-Ram Gopal Varma. But what if you're not Ramu yet?

The second way I've been pushing for a while is: forget about the Indian terrestrial market, where being bought by distributors is an all-or-nothing gamble. Look overseas. Virtually every Indian-themed film released in the US-even the really crappy ones- makes at least $300,000 to $500,000. Some like Bend It... or Monsoon Wedding go on to make tens of millions. Now add Indian satellite TV rights of about $100,000 if you're not a pathetic piece of dreck-and a little more for European and other rights and you can look at some sort of an 'assured' return of about $400,000 for a half-decent film.

Which brings us to the point-can you make a good, proper film within this amount? The answer is a loud 'Yes'. We can afford to produce a technically competent film with Arri cameras, Kodak stock, top-notch crew and great actors from nsd for less than that magic figure of Rs. 2 crore. You can't do this elsewhere on Earth.

Of course, you need to have a global outlook and understand overseas distribution. But every entrepreneur should have that anyway. Indian distributors will also come around, once they realise that the old formula isn't working any more.


Mahesh Murthy heads Passionfund, a firm that invests in and advises companies.
You can reach him at Mahesh@passionfund.com

 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | AT WORK | PERSONAL FINANCE
MANAGING | CASE GAME | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BESTEMPLOYERSINDIA

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | SMART INC
ARCHIVESCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY