Has
India missed the computer hardware bus?'' has been an oft-repeated
question. I believe no country misses any economic bus for all the
time. China is the most recent example of a country boarding the
hardware bus with a vengeance. To give you an idea, China exported
hardware worth $36 billion (Rs 165,600 crore) in 2001, and is the
world's third-largest electronics hardware manufacturer.
China has successfully created an economic
environment and regulatory mechanism that encourages domestic manufacturing.
The critical features of this environment can be summed up as:
- Large domestic consumption led by the government
- Unique packages of investments and tax incentives-special
economic zones, free ports, bonded zones etc.
- State-of-the-art infrastructure
- High competition among the local governments
for attracting hardware industry-related investments
- Flexible labour laws
- Linking of access to domestic market with
condition of local manufacturing
The success of the Chinese experiment can be
gauged from the fact that market size (2002) for most of the products
is 4-10 times that of Indian market (See Where They Stand).
Several considerations favour a vibrant domestic
hardware manufacturing industry. Let me mention the three I find
most compelling. One, the achievement of $87 billion (Rs 400,200
crore) target for software by 2008 would require cumulative imports
of $120 billion (Rs 552,000 crore) worth of hardware between 2001-08.
Can we afford such an import-bill. Two, employment generation in
hardware sector for the same investment is much higher than other
sectors. For every Rs 1crore worth of sales, employment generation
is greater than 10 for hardware, against five-six for engineering
sector. And, three, the nation cannot be self-sufficient in strategic
sectors like defence, nuclear energy, and space without domestic
capabilities in hardware development and manufacturing.
The challenge therefore, is to create an environment
that encourages large domestic consumption and manufacturing of
hardware for domestic and export markets. For encouraging domestic
consumption, I believe we need to work on two fronts.
First, government must take the lead in computerising
and e-enabling its operations, thus leading to large purchases.
Government buying is known to be the most significant catalyst to
trigger domestic consumption.
"The challenge is to create an environment
that encourages large domestic consumption and manufacturing
of hardware for domestic and export markets" |
Second, the incidence of indirect taxes at all
levels-raw materials, components and finished products-must be brought
down drastically. Duties and taxes account for almost 40 per cent
of a pc's cost in India compared to only 17 per cent in China. This
will unleash new demand as well as eliminate the grey market. The
grey market currently accounts for 50 per cent of the total.
For encouraging domestic manufacturing, I would
suggest that income tax exemption on 50 per cent of the profits
earned from electronics/it hardware manufacturing should be given.
In addition, export of electronics/it hardware should be fully exempt
from income tax for a period 10 years. These measures would also
attract foreign investment in hardware manufacturing as has happened
for software development.
Facilitating exports would require development
of world-class infrastructure in terms of power, ports, telecommunications,
transport, and hardware parks on the one hand, and improving velocity
of doing business by simplifying procedures related to exports and
imports, and removing inflexible labour laws, on the other.
In the 1960s, Japan held the centre stage in
global manufacturing. The 70s witnessed the rise of Taiwan and South
Korea. In the 1980s it was Singapore, Malaysia, and Philippines
and since the 1990s it has been China. With the creation of right
environment, India can definitely be the next hardware destination.
|