| 
              
                |  |   
                | LG's Sachin Saxena: He chucked up a job 
                  at Whirlpool to join LG as GM (Production) |  Where 
              had all the headhunters gone? Manufacturing sector execs had even 
              quit asking, things were so bad. Guess what-that's history. And 
              if your cubicle neighbours are dropping their voices sheepishly 
              to whisper 'can't talk now' into their cellphones, you aren't imagining 
              things. Job offers are back.  Ask Sachin Saxena, 34. When this 13-year veteran 
              of HLL's soap wars signed up with Whirlpool a year-and-a-half back, 
              he saw it as a lucky break. But four months ago, he was hired as 
              General Manager (Production) at LG Electronics. And when he speaks 
              to his former colleagues at his old department at HLL, he hears 
              a new wave of excitement-they've started landing jobs again. And 
              so too with other manufacturing sector execs. Soap sellers are selling 
              washing machines, tractor vendors are selling paint and steel execs 
              are doing textiles. It's all happening again.   What's Up?  So what explains the upturn? "Both exports 
              and domestic markets are growing," says Atul Vohra, Partner 
              at search firm Heidrick & Struggles, "and owing to the 
              spur in demand, new capacities are being created, and this is translating 
              into new jobs." By his estimates, the past year saw senior 
              level positions in the manufacturing sector grow at a healthy clip 
              of over 30 per cent.  Yash 
              Yadav, Group Vice-President (hr and Industrial Relations), Escorts, 
              echoes Vohra's ebullience. "In the last 12-18 months, there 
              has been brisk activity in manufacturing, particularly in the auto 
              sector and auto component makers," he reports, pointing to 
              their financial results. It's not wholesale hiring, though, given 
              the corporate cosiness with lean operations (and, of course, lack 
              of greenfield projects). But it's hiring all the same-selective 
              in nature, intended for mission critical work. Change-leaders and 
              shake-up artists, for instance, are in special demand.   Placement firm ABC Consultants also has a bounce 
              to report. Shiv Agrawal, the firm's northern region head, is particularly 
              bullish on engineering. "In the last six months," he says, 
              "we've more than exceeded what we did last year, since R&D 
              wings are being set up by manufacturing companies." Names such 
              as General Motors (gm) and Lear Corporation are on the prowl for 
              high-brain positions. In all, Agrawal says, some 77 global firms 
              have set up R&D centres in India, including equipment manufacturers, 
              engineering design houses, automotive products, chemicals and plastics. 
                
               
                |  |   
                | Jindal Stainless Steel's Taran Sardana: Cashing 
                  in on the marketing boom |  More Teeth, Less Tail  Speak to some recent job-baggers, and the story 
              only gets better. Taran Sardana, 35, has recently switched from 
              Essar Steel to Jindal Stainless as Assistant General Manager (Marketing) 
              and he talks enthusiastically about the upturn. R. Sridhar, General 
              Manager (Vendor Relations), Hyundai, signed up with the Korean auto 
              major this March after a longish stint with Chennai-based tractor 
              maker TAFE, and he highlights the renewed sense of confidence that 
              MNCs-especially the Koreans-have started placing in Indian manufacturing. 
                Hyundai is busy raising its domestic production 
              capacity from 150,000 to 250,000 cars. Therefore, according to the 
              company's hr Head G.S. Ramesh, classic factory jobs are swelling. 
              Over the last four months, the Korean auto major has recruited nearly 
              300 people.  Maruti Udyog (MUL), India's biggest car maker, 
              has also been watching developments carefully. Market competition 
              is set to intensify. "While we may not be adding jobs for the 
              company per se, we will be creating vacancies downstream," 
              says Jagdish Khattar, Managing Director, MUL.  What about the core sector? The cycle seems 
              just right in industries such as steel, for example, which is witnessing 
              another bout of activity. According to S.K. Jain, Vice-President 
              (Group hr), Jindal Organisation, the uptrend will continue for the 
              next two years. Bulk hiring, though, is still not being planned. 
              "Today, the hiring is more on high-skill levels," he says, 
              "and almost all manufacturing companies are looking at ERP, 
              and need people to manage supply chains and logistics." Project 
              managers and marketing minds are also in need, he adds.  Niroop Mahanty, Vice-President (HR), Tata Steel, 
              agrees with that assessment. Specialised skills are in demand. "In 
              the case of the manufacturing sector, job creation will not be so 
              much in hard-core processes, but in the way you deliver to the customer," 
              he says, "I'll reduce people in manufacturing and add to marketing." 
              It's a re-gearing of the teeth-to-tail ratio. As competition grows, 
              companies need sharper market bite and lighter production systems. -Moinak Mitra 
 
               
                |  |   
                | Tipplers' best friend: Not for novices, 
                  strictly |  LATESTBar-tending
 If 
              you think cocktail creation is child's play, think again. Part-time 
              it may be (for some), but booze-blending behind the bar is no simpleton's 
              job. Even a three-year diploma in hospitality management is no good, 
              though on-the-job apprenticeship helps. "We never put freshers directly 
              on to the job," says Anmol Zutshi, Bar Manager, Ashok Hotel, "After 
              all, it's a matter of skill, individual customer taste and experience 
              that teaches the tricks of the trade. We cannot take chances." The 
              salary, starting at some Rs 8,000 per month, "goes significantly 
              up after confirmation". What would bar stardom require you to become? 
              Think 'stress reliever'. Or 'advisor'. Or 'idea bouncer'. At a stretch, 
              even 'shrink'. But not-repeat, not-'waiter'. 
 COUNSELLINGHelp, Tarun!
    I 
              have been an area marketing manager with a construction and chemical 
              company for several years now. I want to do a Ph.D in logistics, 
              with specialisation in product insurance, to achieve my ultimate 
              aim, which is to become a consultant for export insurance and documentation. 
              But I've got pressing problems at home and cannot quit my job to 
              hone my skills for better career prospects. What should I do?  
              A Ph.D is a long-drawn process and if you cannot quit your job, 
              it's going to be tough to pursue it while working. However, you 
              don't need a Ph.D degree to become a consultant-what you need to 
              do is a specialised course in your area of interest and gain hands-on 
              experience in the same. I think you are confused-where did this 
              idea of becoming a consultant for documentation come from? Do you 
              know what remuneration to expect vis-a-vis your current prospects? 
              You need to do a little realistic thinking before you give in to 
              this fascination. If you still want to do a Ph.D, do it, but convince 
              yourself first; you have much at stake-a good job and a happy family. 
                 I am an hr professional with a mid-cap 
              pharma company. For the last three years, I've been spearheading 
              talent-development initiatives, with a fair amount of success. However, 
              researchers in my company are a peculiar breed and seem to be lost 
              in their own world, making it difficult for me to inculcate team 
              spirit and leadership skills in them. They seem to perennially face 
              problems in their inter-personal relationships and are, at times, 
              very curt. What can be done?  I don't think your researchers are arrogant-they 
              are just into different things. They are a breed with different 
              personality traits and skills, and they would rather think molecules 
              than feelings. That's not deliberate rudeness or insensitivity on 
              their part. Also, most of them get away with it since their jobs 
              do not involve interacting with the public. You need to counsel 
              them in a different way. They need to be told that since they are 
              working for an organisation where profits come from the efforts 
              of the whole team, they should work in sync with others. However, 
              if a particular individual is arrogant or rude, counsel him.    I am an engineer with an MBA in marketing 
              from a second-rung B-school. At present, I'm working with a large 
              FMCG company as an area executive. I've already spent two-and-a-half 
              years at the job, but my career does not seem to go anywhere. Prior 
              to this I was working with a pressure cooker major, where I spent 
              about six months post campus recruitment. Now I realise that if 
              I had stayed on in my previous job, I would have gone much farther 
              in my career. I also feel that as an engineer-cum-MBA, I'm overqualified 
              for my present job. Ideally, I would like to work with top-notch 
              consultants. Do you think I can ever get a good break?   Never say never! However, with an MBA from 
              a second-rung institute it may be difficult for you to get a plum 
              job with one of the top consulting firms. Also, in the short term, 
              consulting assignments in larger companies, especially for people 
              with your kind of experience, are limited. But do not give up. Be 
              realistic and try to switch to a position that is commensurate with 
              your experience of three years, and also gives you better job satisfaction. 
                  I am a single, 24-year-old working woman 
              employed with a call centre. I and another girl are invariably made 
              to do night shifts. I'm not averse to this, but the company seems 
              to have made it a rule for the two of us to work only nights, amidst 
              all the other men. I've had a word on this with my team leader and 
              he gives me loads of false assurances. The call centre is teeming 
              with girls during the day and my repeated requests for a shift rotation 
              has fallen on deaf ears. It's not easy for me to work continuous 
              nights and that too with men. What should I do?   Generally night shifts are rotated-unless of 
              course, you were hired specifically for that shift. It is not unusual 
              for girls to work the night shift in call centres; in fact, it is 
              pretty common. However, if the situation is as unfair as you mention 
              and you are uncomfortable, the best way is to go beyond your supervisor 
              and tell someone in hr; they will surely take note. If you have 
              genuine reason to suspect that your being single is the reason why 
              the night shifts are being allotted to you, it would be wise to 
              complain. Or even quit.  
  Answers to your career concerns are contributed 
              by Tarun Sheth (Senior Consultant) and Shilpa Sheth (Managing 
              Partner, US practice) of HR firm, Shilputsi Consultants. Write to 
              Help,Tarun! c/o Business Today, Videocon Tower, Fifth Floor, E-1, 
              Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi-110055. 
  Cutting 
              Edge Health BenefitsIndia Inc and hospital 
              chains are joining hands.
 
               
                |  |   
                | New synergy: Medical insurance can sort 
                  the economics out |  Try 
              looking up the 'healthcare benefits' under some of the new job contracts 
              being signed in the corporate world nowadays, and you might have 
              to reach for a medical encyclopedia. We'll spare you the gory details 
              of the 'dread disease' covers (full reimbursement), but the vagueness 
              is gone, and you have alliances between India Inc and private healthcare 
              businesses to thank for it.  In the old days, of course, reimbursing medical 
              expenses (often for family dependents as well) was an ad hoc goodwill 
              decision, typically taken by a proprietor or corporate chief. The 
              multinational companies, however, made the whole thing official-keen 
              to use assured benefits as a recruitment bait. And now the trend 
              is towards comprehensive corporate health protection deals, which 
              includes regular checkups.   According to Pradeep Thukral, Head (Corporate Marketing), Indraprastha 
              Apollo Hospitals, companies like ONGC, SBI, BHEL, IOC, oil, MTNL, 
              MUL, The Times Group, HLL, L&T, Motorola, HCL Technologies, 
              Hero Honda and TCS have group deals with the hospital. All that's 
              needed now is for medical insurers to step in and make the alliance 
              a three-way one. Synergy is the word.
 -Ananya Roy 
  Retirement 
              RethinkReason must dictate retirement, not 
              tradition.
 Heard the opinion 
                that people must retire at 30? Even Einstein, goes the argument, 
                was at his creative peak in his 20s. Utter nonsense, says Ricardo 
                Semler, the Brazilian 'maverick' entrepreneur. Why in this post-labour 
                world do we chain people to their desks when their bodies are 
                in the best shape to go skydiving, and then force them out when 
                their minds are in the best shape to deliver intellectually? Retirement 
                at 60, 65 or even 30 is rather arbit, is it not?  
                 
                  |  |   
                  | Ricardo Semler: Still in REM dream 
                    phase |  G.C. Jayaprakash, Senior Consultant, StantonChase, 
                agrees with Semler. Age should be immaterial, he says, so long 
                as the person is adding value. Venkat Madhavan, Director, Ernst 
                & Young, agrees only partly, saying that retirement has "lost 
                much of its relevance", but the concept serves as a tool 
                to "legitimately ease out older employees". Joydeep 
                Datta Gupta, ED, PricewaterhouseCoopers, however, sees the definition 
                of any 'peak intellect' age as equally arbit, and would rather 
                go with the rationale of 'natural attrition'. "A young organisation 
                is often more flexible, agile and innovative," he observes. 
                Stanley Bing of Fortune thinks a midlife retirement break would 
                be a swell idea. But the Indian ideal, perhaps, would be Deepak 
                Chopra's solution: ageless body, timeless mind. -Payal Sethi |