|  Budget 
                2005 has brought both joy and misery to taxpayers, particularly 
                the salaried. Finance Minister P. Chidambaram has simplified income 
                tax structures, and you have to pay less tax as a consequence. 
                But while it's true that with the basic exemption limit being 
                raised from Rs 50,000 to Rs 1,00,000, more people would fall outside 
                the minimum taxable limit, the introduction of a couple of riders, 
                such as doing away with standard deduction and the introduction 
                of a fringe benefit tax (FBT), don't augur well for the salaried 
                community. If anything, it threatens to increase its tax burden 
                rather than provide any relief.
  The removal of standard deduction (up to 
                Rs 30,000), which was available only to the salaried class, will 
                hit hardest. That's because standard deduction was a substitute 
                for expenses incurred while working (akin to the fixed percentage 
                standard deduction available for repairs in rented-out properties), 
                and doing away with it means the possibility that more people 
                will qualify to pay income tax, particularly people with lower 
                incomes (see Are You Better Off?), is very real. Says tax expert 
                Kanu Doshi: "Doing away with standard deduction literally 
                tends to suffocate the middle class as it provides extremely limited 
                scope for tax planning." As for FBT, since it's the employer 
                who is liable to pay 30 per cent tax on fringe benefits given 
                to employees, it is likely that some benefits may be withdrawn. 
                Though there's some confusion about the exact expenses that will 
                be covered, it is certain that most perks given to employees (like 
                your company phone at home) will be taxed. For the employer, transferring 
                the value of these benefits to the normal salary would save them 
                from paying FBT, but that would proportionately add to the tax 
                burden of the employee. Which is bad news for salaried people.  The Consultant Option  As such, it makes sense for you to consider 
                turning consultant at the place where you work. As a consultant, 
                you are able to retain the value of all perceived benefits such 
                as gratuity, employer's contribution to provident fund, and so 
                on. And with several companies allowing consultants to work in 
                normal office hours, the only thing that will change will be your 
                tax status. Doshi, for one, advocates the consultant option, and 
                points out that whereas it is not possible to claim any expenses 
                as a salaried individual, as a consultant the different heads 
                under which you can claim professional expenses is pretty much 
                endless. These include travelling expenses, membership fees for 
                clubs and associations, depreciation on assets used for business 
                purposes like cars or computers, telephone bills (both landline 
                and mobile), money spent on entertaining guests and business associates, 
                subscriptions to magazines, money spent on education, medical 
                expenses, even salary paid to your spouse can qualify as a valid 
                expense as long as you can prove that your spouse is qualified 
                for that job. All these expenses can be deducted from a consultant's 
                income, which in turn would lead to a substantially lower final 
                tax figure (see Being A Consultant Pays). In addition to all this, 
                a consultant can work out of home, and show expenses as home office 
                expenses. Says Doshi: "At any level, the income derived as 
                a consultant would give several tax advantages by way of various 
                allowances of expenses."  But naturally, there are caveats. For all 
                expenses incurred, you need to show substantial proof, so it's 
                important that only genuine expenditure be shown as professional 
                expenses. Example? "If you are working from home, you can't 
                claim your entire landline bill as professional expenditure," 
                says Gautam Nayak, President, Bombay Chartered Accountants Association. 
                Then, with the onus of proof on you, you need to keep all your 
                corners covered. That, according to Prasad R., founder of Filemyreturns.com, 
                means keeping tabs on every penny that you spend, from cab fare 
                to breaking up your phone bill into official and personal segments. 
                It also means holding on to every small voucher that proves an 
                expense, maintaining extensive books of accounts, and getting 
                a tax audit done if your income is above Rs 10 lakh. "It 
                (being a consultant) is a good option as long as you can show 
                all the expenses incurred," says Prasad. Then, the overall 
                process of filing returns is much simpler for a salaried employee.  The most important caveat, though, is that 
                your employer has to agree to your turning consultant, which some 
                may not be very willing to do. If you can wangle that, and if 
                you have the diligence to handle the assorted headaches that come 
                with being a consultant, it's time for you to change track. |