| 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | GIHL's Mittal: Steeling 
                    up for a 'brotherly' fight |  The facts of this case are curious, 
                to say the least. And the battlefield is located in the unlikeliest 
                of places: Liberia, in West Africa. The government there had invited 
                bids from global steel companies to develop its iron ore industry. 
                Lakshmi Niwas Mittal's eponymous steel company won the contract 
                in May 2005, and, for good measure, offered to develop the port 
                of Buchanan and a railway system in that country. So far so good! 
                But this is where Mittal's younger brother, Pramod, got into the 
                act. His company, Global Infrastructure Holdings Ltd (GIHL), and 
                Provider Ltd, his Liberian partner-which had submitted a joint 
                bid-took the Liberian government to court alleging that it had 
                "illegally" favoured Mittal Steel while awarding the 
                contract. The GIHL consortium claims it had signed an MoU with 
                Liberia Mining Corporation for the same mining rights in November 
                2003. There are dark hints of international political intrigue 
                and influence peddling. Jacob Varnam, a Director of Provider, 
                has reportedly alleged that John Blaney, us Ambassador to Liberia, 
                prevailed upon Charles Gyude Bryant, Liberia's interim President, 
                to swing the deal L.N. Mittal's way. Apparently, Inland Ispat, 
                a Mittal Steel-owned company, had written to Blaney in September 
                2004 that sourcing cheap iron ore from Liberia for its us operations 
                would protect in excess of 30,000 jobs in the Chicago area. Calls 
                to L.N. Mittal's offices in London did not elicit any response. 
                Devasis Chattopadhyay, Senior Vice President (Corporate Communications), 
                Ispat India, a Pramod Mittal company, clarifies: "We have 
                not filed any case against Mittal Steel. Our grievance is against 
                the Liberian government. It just happened that the company on 
                the other side happened to be L.N. Mittal's." Point noted.    -Sahad P.V.   
  Paul: 
                0, Jindal: 1Brother-in-law outscores Swraj Paul.
 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | Caparo Maruti's Paul: Very 
                    little to smile about |  The battle between lord Swraj Paul 
                and his brother-in-law M.D. Jindal over the control of the Rs 
                95-crore Caparo Maruti just changed gears. On June 8 and 9, 2005, 
                two police officers from Kolkata's Alipore Police Station raided 
                Rajendra Bhavan, Caparo Maruti's registered office on Deen Dayal 
                Upadhyay Marg in New Delhi. The cops, acting on the orders of 
                the Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, seized several documents; but 
                the most important ones-the books containing the minutes of board 
                meetings and the register of members-were not available. Registered 
                offices are required to maintain these books under the Companies 
                Act, 1956. Jindal claims the minutes will substantiate his charges 
                of forgery and criminal conspiracy against Paul.   Earlier, on May 31, 2005, Paul's crack team of lawyers, led 
                by Arun Jaitley and Rajiv Nayar, heard the Delhi High Court dismiss 
                his petition seeking the quashing of Jindal's criminal complaint 
                (which alleges diversion of funds and criminal conspiracy for 
                backdating the minutes). "It's sufficient to say for now 
                that an offence has been made out and the complaint cannot be 
                quashed," the order says. Paul, son Angad, and key executives 
                will have to seek bail at the Patiala trial court, New Delhi, 
                on July 15.   The Delhi-based Caparo Maruti, which supplies chassis and dashboards 
                to Maruti Udyog, is a joint venture between Paul (60 per cent 
                stake), Jindal and Maruti (20 per cent each).  -Kumarkaushalam 
  OUTSOURCINGIndia Calling
 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | Quasar's Dutt: Revolutionising 
                    design |  It's another hurray for India. After 
                Nokia and Elcoteq, it's the turn of Nasdaq-listed Primus to set 
                up a manufacturing base in India. For starters, it has sub-contracted 
                the entire design and development of its dual SIM card PTL 910 
                mobile phone to the Bangalore-based Quasar Innovations. The new 
                phone, which will let users switch between service providers without 
                switching off the device, has been in the works for six-seven 
                months. After some final testing and certification procedures, 
                it is expected to go into production sometime in July or August 
                this year. Quasar officials inform that the manufacturing site 
                will be somewhere in South India, but cite non-disclosure agreements 
                for not revealing more. "I can tell you that the phone will 
                be ready for production by July and mass manufacturing is likely 
                to begin sometime in the second or third quarter of this year 
                by an independent Indian EMS (electronic manufacturing services) 
                company," says Ramakrishna Dutt, Managing Director of Quasar 
                Innovations. "We are trying to revolutionise the concept 
                of a virtual ODM (original design maker) and we eventually hope 
                to devise 15 to 17 models," says Dutt, whose five-year-old 
                company counts Motorola, Ericsson and Texas Instruments among 
                its customers. "The biggest challenge," says Dutt, "was 
                convincing Primus about India's viability as a mobile phone manufacturing 
                base, compared to traditional venues like China and Taiwan." 
                -Rahul Sachitanand 
  The BT 50 IndexEveryone's happy, but a small correction 
                is round the corner.
 It seems that the stock market punters 
                watch the progress of the monsoon more closely than the Indian 
                Meteorological Department. And only because of its progress on 
                the expected lines, the stock market could shrug off another major 
                spike in international crude prices (it went back to $55 or Rs 
                2,420 before easing to $53 or Rs 2,332 a barrel now) and settle 
                at very high levels. The bt 50 index has moved up to 259, very 
                close to its all-time peak of 264. But with the end of futures 
                and options cycles getting closer, expect the market to get into 
                a short-term correction mode.  Our flagship free float methodology-based index-BT 50-has completed 
                two years now. The free float methodology has several advantages: 
                first, it considers only the value of stocks freely available 
                in the market (after excluding the part held by promoters and 
                other strategic investors) and the weightage assigned to individual 
                shares is more representative than the market capitalisation-based 
                methodology; second, it takes care of the perpetual selection 
                dilemma regarding closely-held companies. For instance, the inclusion 
                of these companies may distort the index based on total market 
                capitalisation methodology, but dropping them altogether may reduce 
                its representative character. The free float methodology facilitates 
                inclusion of large closely-held companies but assigns them a lesser 
                weightage. After the success of our broad market free float index 
                (that the Sensex subsequently decided to adopt this is testimony 
                to the efficacy of the free float method), we decided to launch 
                sector indices using the same method. While the general index 
                captures the overall movements (covering several sectors), sector 
                indices capture the movements in individual sectors. All these 
                indices have a common base period (January 1, 2002). The weightages 
                are reassigned every quarter after companies declare their ownership 
                details. The base value of all BT indices is 100.  -Narendra Nathan 
  CORPORATETaking Nokia To Court
 A Pune-based start-up says Nokia stole its 
                idea.
 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | Nokia India MD Sanjeev Sharma |  Three months ago, Nokia India launched 
                a multi-media blitz to promote its marketing programme 'Capture 
                Your Imagination'. Now, the country's first-ever mobile imaging 
                contest has led to a criminal investigation against the multinational 
                handset maker. The charge: stealing the MMS (multimedia messaging 
                service) photo contest concept developed by Pune-based startup, 
                One-A Communication Hub (One-A).  Acting on a complaint by One-A, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 
                Delhi (CMM), on April 19, 2005, directed the Deputy Commissioner 
                of Police, Crime Branch, IPR Section, Delhi Police, to investigate 
                the allegations and submit a report by August 28, 2005. The CMM's 
                order notes: "...It is further stated that on September 9, 
                2004, Mrs Anubha Doshi, Partner (One-A) e-mailed her first proposal 
                regarding the unique contest to Ravneet Phukela, Brand Manager, 
                Nokia Multimedia, highlighting the benefits to Nokia by sponsoring 
                the event (sic)." Says Vaibhav Gagar, One-A's counsel: "Between 
                September 9 and October 20, 2004, One-A held detailed discussions 
                with Nokia via e-mail." One such e-mail from Nokia Multimedia's 
                Sheffali Chachi (dated September 18, 2004) to Doshi states: "Conceptually 
                interested. Am forwarding to our regional MKTG/sales team to carry 
                forward with you." Nokia claims it knows nothing about this 
                criminal case.  One-A has also filed a civil suit against Nokia before the Delhi 
                High Court praying for orders restraining it from going ahead 
                with the photo contest and for damages of Rs 20 lakh. No interim 
                orders have been passed in this suit. The case before the CMM 
                will come up for hearing after the police submits its investigation 
                report. Nokia's spokesman declined to comment as the matter is 
                sub-judice. -Kumarkaushalam |