|
Family first: Jacob (L) and Marcus Wallenberg |
It
takes a few minutes for the irony to sink in. Here you are, at
a five-star hotel in Delhi, meeting with two scions of one of
the most powerful business families in the world, and the venue
for your meeting isn't a super-plush presidential suite or even
a business centre conference room, but a (hastily-chosen) noisy
corner of the hotel's lobby, where people come and go, well, talking
of Michelangelo. The Wallenberg scions themselves-Jacob and Marcus-have
just returned from a trip around the city, and it's their wish
that we sit someplace not claustrophobic. There's no retinue of
executives or hangers on, just the two Wallenbergs (besides Erik
Belfrage, senior adviser, Investor AB, and the man responsible
for getting them to India) in white shirt and tie, with Marcus'
coat draped over the back of his chair. Looking at the down-to-earth
duo, it's hard to imagine that between them, the Wallenbergs have
investments in over 100 companies, with a combined market value
of over $14 billion (Rs 61,600 crore), and that back home in Sweden,
they are as important-if not more-as King Carl Gustaf or Prime
Minister Goran Persson.
But that's the Wallenbergs for you. Founded
by Andre Oscar Wallenberg in the middle of the 19th century, the
Wallenberg business empire has grown and grown to include investments
in companies such as ABB, Ericsson, AstraZeneca, Skandinaviska
Enskilda Banken (SEB), and OMX, which owns stock exchanges in
Stockholm and Helsinki, among others. At the heart of the Wallenberg
empire is Investor AB, their holding company, which has between
3 and 20 per cent ownership-but typically greater voting rights-in
11 core companies (see Investor's Jewels). That apart, the family
acts as a fund of funds (that is, it invests in hedge and private
equity funds such as ram One and EQT Partners AB) and even has
its own private equity funds under the Investor umbrella.
The surprising bit-and this is where Indian
family-owned businesses may want to borrow a leaf or two from
their experience-is that despite being in its sixth generation
(Jacob and Marcus belong to the fifth generation), the Wallenberg
family has stayed together, led by some simple but profound principles
that go as far back as the founder himself. For example, there's
a simple rule that decides succession: the eldest son (women aren't
expected to participate in the family business) automatically
becomes the group chief, provided he has the ability and the inclination
to lead. Also, notwithstanding their personal wealth, the Wallenbergs
are expected to work hard, and dedication to duty is considered
a key part of their upbringing. Therefore, to this day, both Jacob,
who's the new Chairman of Investor AB, and Marcus, Chairman of
SEB, go to work every day. Says Jacob: "I think you have
to have that drive in order to be able to sit in the middle of
what's going on business-wise and bring in the interest that you
have to put into it."
Owners But Not Managers
Showing up at work every day, however, doesn't
mean that the Wallenbergs are control freaks. Their responsibility,
says Jacob, "is to be the owners, and we execute that responsibility
and our business ideas through board memberships". That's
also by design. "We have 15 major businesses, we have a large
number of companies on the private equity side, and if you put
yourself as the CEO (in any of these companies) that'll take away
90 per cent of your time," he says. Interestingly too, unlike
holding companies in India (think Tata Sons, Pilani Investments
or Reliance's maze of investment companies), Investor is listed
on the Stockholm stock exchange, making it transparent. The Wallenbergs
control Investor via a family foundation.
All that, however, doesn't mean that the
Wallenbergs haven't had their share of ups and downs. The family
did face a crisis of sorts in the fourth generation of Marc and
Peter Wallenberg (fathers of Marcus and Jacob, respectively),
when there were stark differences of opinion between the two brothers,
resulting in the emergence of what Professor Hakan Lindgren of
the Stockholm School of Economics described as "two distinct
spheres of interest within the Wallenberg family business group
in the 1960s and 1970s". One group, the professor wrote in
a paper presented at the sixth European Business History Association
annual congress in Helsinki in 2002, "was made of companies
with JW (Jacob Wallenberg, brother of Marcus Wallenberg Jr., or
mw, that is grandfather of the two gentlemen featured in this
article) as Chairman of the board, and (another), where mw was
Chairman". The biggest flashpoint was the merger of Skandinaviska
Banken and Stockholms Enskilda Bank in 1972-an event the run up
to which so traumatised Marc that he took his own life. JW died
in 1980 and when mw, too, died in 1982, Swedish media announced
the end of the Wallenberg era.
However, Peter Wallenberg, who took over
as Chairman of Investor in 1982, steadied the family business
and increased effective ownership in sphere companies. Peter also
gave greater freedom to the CEOs of sphere companies. Today, according
to Investor's guidelines on corporate governance, the Chairman's
role (the Investor nominee is usually the Chairman) is to ensure
smooth functioning of the board, evaluate its performance, identify
areas of improvement, and interface between the management and
the principal owners.
As a policy, Investor puts a company's needs
and specific requirements at the centre of its relationship with
it. If that means certain contradictions within the sphere companies,
so be it. For example, in India, ABB is bullish on the country
and has even made India a single manufacturing location for certain
power equipment, but Electrolux has almost given up on the market.
It has sold its plants to Videocon, and has just around 5 per
cent share of the overall white goods market. Says Marcus: "You
have to remember that these companies are separate companies,
dealing with different markets, and have entered India at different
times and on different premises. I don't think that Electrolux
is not seeing the potential; it's more they are trying to find
the right way."
So far, the Wallenbergs have refrained from
investing directly in India, but that may soon change (See "We
Have A Long Tradition Of Following India"). In the five days
that the Wallenbergs spent in India recently, they met Commerce
Minister Kamal Nath, Ratan Tata, Deepak Parekh, Baba Kalyani and
Sunil Kant Munjal, besides a host of other Indian businessmen.
Says Jacob: "The world's perception of India is changing."
Obviously, critics who've announced the death of family-owned
businesses, underestimate the strength that lie in them.
INTERVIEW
"We Have A Long Tradition Of Following
India"
|
Jacob Wallenberg, Chairman, Investor
AB
|
Marcus Wallenberg, Chairman, Skandinaviska
Enskilda Banken AB
|
Leading a
business delegation of over 65 top Nordic CEOs to India recently,
Jacob Wallenberg and Marcus Wallenberg, both 49,
met up with BT's Shailesh Dobhal and
R. Sridharan. Excerpts:
With cheaper manufacturing options like
China, and now India, booming, how are industrialised economies
such as Sweden and EU adapting?
Jacob: I am absolutely convinced that
we will see continued (protectionist) reactions within Europe,
because shocks to the system and the individual are significant
when we start to close down plants. And this will be a very significant
challenge for the politicians to deal with. In Sweden, we had
up to now, a very good working relationship between labour unions
and all political parties in their collaboration with private
enterprise.
You, as the Wallenbergs of Investor AB,
haven't focussed on India in any big way, only your sphere companies
have. What explains this?
Jacob: We
have a long tradition of following India. I must say that if you
consider Swedish companies with other (country) multinationals,
they (Swedish companies) were early starters in India. The general
feeling was that India is a challenging market and was even more
challenging back then, but obviously it is changing. The world's
perception of India is changing and that is one of the reasons
why we are here.
|
"I believe the world's
perception of India is changing"
Jacob Wallenberg |
Will this visit lead to your Asia Fund
(Investor Capital Partners-Asia Fund) looking at India in a big
way?
Marcus: This
fund (Investor Capital Partners-Asia Fund) has been set up with
a very close geographical focus, and I don't think you can move
out of that perspective. But, of course, you can look at a (new)
fund that can concentrate on India. In fact, a number of private
equity persons have come along with us, but draw no conclusions.
How do you react to two of your sphere
companies taking diametrically opposite views on India-Electrolux,
which has virtually pulled out of India, and ABB, which is upbeat
on India and is making it a big manufacturing base?
Marcus: No,
Electrolux has not pulled out of India, only (worked out) a different
production arrangement. They have not pulled out the brand or
the products. You have to remember that these companies are separate
companies, dealing with different markets, and have entered India
at different times and on different premises. And some of them
have been very successful in finding the right structures and
some of them have had a tougher time. I don't think Electrolux
is not seeing the potential; it's more they are trying to find
the right way.
When you are the owner there is a great
temptation to end up running the business, much like many business
families in India do. How do you resist that temptation?
Jacob: We
have 15 major businesses. We have a large number of companies
on the private equity side. And if you put yourself as a CEO (in
any of these companies), that takes away 90 per cent of your time.
Our responsibility, and that is what we have determined it to
be, is to be the owners. And we execute that responsibility and
our business ideas through board memberships. And most often,
I have been at the Chairman's position with these companies-and,
in Sweden, the chairmanship is a non-executive position. But it
is a position where you have to stay quite involved in what's
going on in the company, the policy decisions, etcetera. Nor do
we have such a holding in these companies that we could demand
the CEO's post.
|
"You have to be long term
if you want to build a business"
Marcus Wallenberg |
Every now and then, you have a management
Cassandras predicting the demise of family-run businesses. What
makes family-run businesses tick?
Marcus: Let
me start with something else. You always have this debate of short
term versus long term, especially in the western world, where
you have a lot of fund managers who work for the short term. My
view is that you need both short-term and long-term (views), otherwise
you won't have a capital market that is liquid. But if you have
to be building a business, you have to be long term. You can't
run a pharmaceutical company and not be long term; it's impossible.
It takes you eight to 12 years to put through a new drug. And,
I think, it is easier to be long term in a family set-up than
a pure institutional set-up, where you're day-to-day run by many
(competing) views.
How have you managed to keep the family
intact when, everywhere else, including here in India, we're seeing
families split?
Marcus:
In our case, our holdings are in the family foundation. We are
actively participating in this (businesses) on behalf of the foundation.
It is not our money, it is the foundation's money. So, we don't
have that element of distraction. And you know, if you are in
a family, you have to give and you have to take. You may have
different views on things, but you have to see that (whether)
you are there for your own personal benefit or try to help out
the family (interest) in the long term.
Jacob: You can't only argue from your
vantage point, you have to look at family interests.
|