|
THE ROAD AHEAD
The 11th Five-Year Plan will focus
on the following |
Agriculture: Crop
diversification, contract farming, improved irrigation and
rural infrastructure
Health: Big boost to health facilities,
mainly in rural areas
Urban Reforms: Funds for cities
willing to reform, to showcase infrastructure
Power Play: Step up generation
and improve distribution. Punishment for power theft
Labour Reforms: Consensual approach.
If Wal-Mart comes, won't jobs follow? |
There's
a common complaint running through the corridors of all the central
ministries dealing with economic affairs: that no policy guidelines
are cleared without the express consent of the Planning Commission
or Yojana Bhavan, in Delhi's Parliament Street; and that it has
become, virtually, a "super ministry of economic affairs".
That's primarily because Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman
of the Planning Commission, is, arguably, Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh's closest confidante on all economic issues.
And it is this tried and tested firm of Singh
and Ahluwalia that is drawing up a blueprint-aka the 11th Five-Year
Plan (2007-2012)- that promises to transform India into an economic
powerhouse. "If all goes well, the country will see a 6.5
per cent growth in per capita income and a 10 per cent reduction
in people below the poverty line within five years. At this rate,
the per capita income should double in 10 years," says Ahluwalia.
The new Plan will be "more inclusive" to ensure that
reforms benefit the aam admi.
Agriculture is the laggard that is dragging
down India's growth curve. It has grown at less than 2 per cent
per annum in the first three years of the 10th Plan (2002-2007),
against a projected figure of 4 per cent. The 11th Plan proposes
to redress this by focussing on crop diversification, increasing
the area under irrigation-projects worth Rs 1,72,000 crore have
already been announced-and making available high quality seeds
to farmers. Ahluwalia is also confident that the Rs 1,74,000-crore
Bharat Nirman Project and the Rs 1,00,000-crore National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme will change the face of rural India.
Ahluwalia's other pet priority is infrastructure. There has been
some progress on this front, but much is still left to be done.
The allocations are: Rs 1,72,000 crore for roads, Rs 50,000 crore
for airports, Rs 60,000 crore for ports and Rs 1,00,000 crore
for railways. What about leakages and graft that invariably accompany
such massive outlays of funds. "In the end, there is no substitute
for a watchful citizenry demanding accountability from the government,"
he says. This means the Plan panel will closely monitor the mega
projects it midwifes.
Where will such humungous sums of money come
from? Ahluwalia's answer: "From domestic and foreign investors."
The government will also set up an SPV (special purpose vehicle)-which
will float bonds worth $2 billion (Rs 8,800 crore)-that will meet
any funding shortfall. The SPV will be formed by the end of this
month; work on drafting a model concession agreement and putting
in place a proper regulatory mechanism-crucial for attracting
private investors-is already at an advanced stage.
The Plan will also address the issue of lifting
sectoral caps on FDI (foreign direct investment), which is holding
back the free inflow of funds and focus on upgrading urban infrastructure.
And Ahluwalia adds that he will try to ease the flow of FDI into
the retail sector.
But can the government actually implement
such an ambitious road map? Doubts persist. Says Surjit S. Bhalla,
MD, Oxus Research and Investments: "The good intentions are
only on paper but the harsh reality is that it is the most populist
government in the last three years."
The compulsions of coalition politics and
competitive populism have derailed several reform initiatives
over the last year. How the Manmohan-Montek duo tackle the politics
of economics will, then, determine whether their grand vision
can turn into reality.
"We're Not Pegging Our Targets To China's
Standards"
Despite
poor farm growth and rising oil prices, India's manufacturing
sector has just pepped up the economy with a strong showing in
the first quarter of 2005-06. The Finance Minister is bullish
about outrunning China. In an exclusive interview with BT's
Ashish Gupta and K.
Sai Srinivas, Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek
Singh Ahluwalia talks about the 11th Plan and how he proposes
to circumvent the pitfalls of the 10th Plan. Excerpts:
The 11th Five-Year Plan kicks off in 2007.
How will it be different from the earlier Five-Year Plans?
The Plan is being drafted at a time when India's
capacity to sustain an annual growth rate of 8 per cent is not
in much doubt. Given a proper policy framework, we can easily
achieve a per capita income growth of 6.5 per cent; this will
result in a doubling of individual incomes in 10 years. And, the
focus of the Plan will be on an inclusive growth.
Can it take India closer to China's level
of growth?
Our goal will be to achieve maximum growth
and a commensurate improvement in the living standards of our
people. We are not pegging our targets to China's standards.
How will you ensure that agriculture does
grow at 4 per cent?
It is very clear that bottlenecks in irrigation,
water management, crop diversification and rural infrastructure
have to be addressed. (The sector has grown at only below 2 per
cent so far during the 10th Plan).
What about power sector reforms?
Progress in this area has been disappointing.
I think the biggest problem is the inefficient distribution system.
This will, obviously, have to be tackled. And punishment for power
thefts must be swift.
The privatisation of airports and the
public-private partnership model seem to have got stuck. Some
foreign consortia have withdrawn because of tough penalty laws...
Only two bidders have withdrawn as they were
not willing to give guarantees on their own performance. I have
no regrets on that.
What about opposition from trade unions?
I recognise that there is apprehension. Let
me say that I have talked personally to a lot of people who actually
work in airports and they don't oppose this.
Has the City Challenge Fund made any big
difference?
Upgrading of urban infrastructure is mostly
viewed as work that has to be done by some departments of local
governments. But that's not enough. If a city comes forward saying
'this is the infrastructure we need and these are the reforms
we're willing to carry out', the Central government will provide
the funds. Money, obviously, is the carrot but there is no punishment
for not carrying out reforms.
How will you generate funds for massive
infrastructure projects like Bharat Nirman (estimated cost: Rs
1,74,000 crore)?
The Finance Ministry will, hopefully, have
a special purpose vehicle in place for this by the end of this
month.
What about FDI in retail?
We are modernising every part of the economy;
so why should retail be any different? Organised retailing currently
makes up only 3 per cent of the overall retail pie in the country.
So, clearly, there's massive room for expansion. Wal-Mart sources
about $1 billion (Rs 4,400 crore) worth of merchandise from India
compared to $20 billion (Rs 88,000 crore) from China. A 20:1 ratio
is ridiculous. We will push for a comprehensive policy to close
this gap.
|