NIIT
Rajendra Pawar,
CEO
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
REVENUES*
|
509
|
625
|
481
|
OPER. PROFIT
|
20
|
138
|
106
|
(In Rs crore, from the education business)
NUMBER OF CENTRES: 2,497
NUMBER OF COMPANIES-OWNED
CENTRES: 30
IMPACT OF SLOWDOWN: Revenues
down 9 per cent and profits down 61 per cent as compared to
FY 2000; workforce slashed in 2001 by over 300. The number of
company owned centres has fallen drastically from a high of
200 over two years ago.
WHAT THE FUTURE
HOLDS: Hopes its low-margin SWIFT courses
will ensure steady revenues. Expanding presence in schools and
colleges. Futurz, a course that accounts for over 65 per cent
of revenues of its education business, is unlikely to look up
soon. |
Meet Sanjeev Khanna. He's 21,
a graduate in History from one of the lesser colleges affiliated
to Delhi University, and was aware, even as he enrolled for his
degree in humanities that his qualification wouldn't take him very
far in life. Reluctant to be part of life's flotsam, he signed up
for a three-year programme at NIIT. The ads looked good, the brochures,
even better, and the company held out the promise of a job abroad
with an Indian software major, possibly with a multinational. Today,
a year after he completed both his bachelor's degree and the three-year
programme, Sanjeev is still in search of a job.
Sanjeev isn't alone.
Every year close to 10 lakh software-hopefuls enroll for programmes
at education-centres run by 30-odd companies. In money terms, that's
a Rs 2,000-crore industry-one that grew at an average of 36 per
cent over the past five years; and one that may well be dying now.
It's a death that's manifest in the stock prices
of software education majors such as NIIT and Aptech (between them,
they boast a marketshare of 56 per cent). At the time this article
was being written, the first was quoting at Rs 234, a staggering
94 per cent off its February 2000 peak (Rs 3,800); the second at
Rs 63.65, an equally staggering 96 per cent off its February 2000
peak (Rs 1,540).
It's a death that's evident in the financial
statements of these companies. NIIT's 2000-01 turnover (its year
ends in September) was 8 per cent lower than the corresponding figure
for the previous year; its profits, 29 per cent lower. Aptech's
numbers give no cause for cheer either: the company's turnover for
the year 2001 (its year ends in December) was 39 per cent lower
than that for 2000; its profits, 29 per cent lower. Even SSI, which,
with its focus on specialised programmes, was expected to be insulated
from the market chill-its 2001-sales increased by 76 per cent; its
profits by 4 per cent-saw its revenues for the last two quarters
take a hit.
THE CHRYSALIS ANGLE |
There's a thin
line separating venture capitalists from vulture capitalists.
Chrysalis may have overstepped that line when it picked up a
5 per cent stake in education major NIIT from the market between
November and December, 2001. Nomenclature apart, that was a
smart move. Chrysalis got its foot in the door and was soon
knocking on the doors of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board
(FIPB) for permission to increase its stake in the company to
15 per cent.
The FIPB says it will clear the proposal on the condition
that Chrysallis obtains NIIT's approval. But NIIT is in no
hurry to consider the proposal. Says a NIIT spokesperson:
''The promoters are not diluting their equity and no meeting
of the NIIT board is scheduled in the near future.''
With a large investment in egurucool.com, Chrysalis could
be looking to drive the synergies of an offline and online
business. Who better to do it with than NIIT, which has a
35 per cent marketshare? Expect more such activity in the
edu-space.
|
And it is a death that is apparent in the projected
growth of the IT education market. According to one study by the
Mumbai-based Business Consulting Group, the industry will shrink
by 35 per cent in 2002. As Ryan Lowe, the senior consultant at BCG
who authored the report puts it, ''Several franchisees now want
to sell out because they don't think the business has a future.''
In Mumbai, for instance, NIIT's Matunga centre and SSI's Bandra
centre have shut shop. And Aptech's Santa Cruz centre has changed
hands.
Franchising, in case you are wondering, was
the route adopted by most IT education majors to grow. They'd design
the curriculum, set the standards, and let the franchisee run the
business. So, when the business suffers, IT won't just be the companies
that will go down: they'll take with them an estimated 6,000 entrepreneurs
who rode a decade long software boom.
The Coroner's Report
All was well as long as Indian IT services
companies felt the need for warm bodies that could code. In the
1990s they couldn't have enough. The creation of a market economy,
IT education companies were better equipped to meet this demand
than engineering schools. The nineties were also a decade of transformation
for Indian companies that realised the imperative to endow their
business processes with an information technology backbone. That
spurred demand for middle-of-the-road IT-pros who could serve as
network administrators, infotech managers, and all-purpose trouble-shooters.
Tata
Infotech
Rahul Thapan,
Head (Education Services)
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
REVENUES*
|
523
|
500
|
420
|
OPER. PROFIT
|
27
|
6
|
6
|
(In Rs crore, from the education business)
NUMBER OF CENTRES: 309
NUMBER OF COMPANIES-OWNED
CENTRES: 4
IMPACT OF SLOWDOWN: The
consumer business has been badly hit; the company's focus has
changed to corporate training. Since the ducation division accounts
for only 17 per cent of the company's revenues, the impact of
slowdown has been cushioned.
WHAT THE FUTURE
HOLDS: The new focus seems to be working.
Company ahs already seen an increase inthe contribution of high-end
corporate-oriented programmes to its revenues, from 5 per cent
in March 2001 to 35 per cent in December. |
By the turn of the century, though, engineering
schools (there were more of them now) had got their act together.
More significantly, the Indian software sector found itself caught
in the grip of a downturn (its first ever). Exacerbating things
were the great dotcom bust and the fact that much of corporate Indian
seemed to have had its fill of IT pros-there are only so many network
administrators a company can hire. Today, few software services
companies hire software engineers from the likes of NIIT and Aptech.
As Hema Ravichandar, Senior Vice President, Human Resources, at
Infosys Technologies says, ''We (only) hire from the best institutions
like the IITs and IIMs; we also hire people with a masters degree
in computer applications.'' Adds S. Mahalingam, Executive Vice President,
Tata Consultancy Services, ''Most of our new hires are from engineering
colleges.'' To back those quotes with a number: of the 2,000 entry-level
software jocks hired by TCS, just two were from NIIT. Why, even
smaller IT services companies don't settle for anyone who isn't
an engineer. ''This year, we have already hired over 50 people and
all of them are engineers,'' says Vishnu Dusad, Managing Director,
Nucleus Software, a Delhi-based company that operates in the banking
and financial services vertical.
The change in recruiting-focus can be easily
explained: Indian software companies are no longer content to provide
low-end IT services. Some, like Ittiam Systems and Sasken Communications
aspire to be in the product space; others, like Infosys, wish to
enter the business transformation domain and compete with large
consulting firms; and still others, like Wipro and HCL Technologies
see a lucrative niche for themselves in high-end technology services.
Coding is infra-dig and coders, not very much in demand.
Another reason for the fix the IT education
industry finds itself in is simple tunnel vision: most companies
focused their efforts on franchisees and students, ignoring their
real customers, recruiters. Admits a former NIIT employee: ''All
of us, NIIT, Aptech, and the like, used to view students as our
customers; only when the industry starts viewing the companies that
employ their students as customers will things change.''
Aptech
Atul Nishar,
Chairman
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
REVENUES*
|
285
|
404
|
320
|
OPER. PROFIT
|
54
|
82
|
51
|
(In Rs crore, from the education business)
NUMBER OF CENTRES: 2,436
NUMBER OF COMPANIES-OWNED
CENTRES: 17
IMPACT OF SLOWDOWN: Revenues
down 39 per cent and profits down 29 per cent over FY 2000;
workforce slashed in 2001 by 25 per cent; the Asset International
business has been hit by tech slowdown.
WHAT THE FUTURE
HOLDS: The company hopes its geographical
spread, broader than that of market-leader NIIT, will help cushion
the impact. |
Rigor Mortis Or Still Warm?
So, while some companies-''Eighteen of India's
top 20 IT companies hire our students,'' claims an NIIT spokesperson-put
up a brave front, others aren't as bullish. ''In the past one year,
the market for students graduating from IT training institutes has
disappeared,'' confesses Pradeep Tripathi, the Chief Executive of
Edutech Informatics, which runs 250 such institutes across India.
Adds Ganesh Natarajan, the CEO of Zensar and the former CEO of Aptech's
education division, ''The window of opportunity for entry-level
programmers, who would typically enter the market after a year or
more of training at one of these companies has closed now.''
The result is a shakeout in an once-stable
industry: Aptech has decided to separate its education and software
businesses (both entities will be listed); NIIT has been selling
its company-owned centres (and has managed to find buyers for four,
out of a total of 30) in an effort to reduce its operating expenses;
Edutech is considering moving on to bioinformatics; the West-Bengal-based
George Telegraph Training Institute, which runs a chain of 14 centres
has already made the shift to what it calls ''call centre training'';
and the market is abuzz with rumours that Chrysalis' bid to acquire
a 15 per cent stake in NIIT (See The Chrysalis Deal) is a pre-cursor
to a two-, even three-way alliance between the company and others
in the same space.
While the retail-end of the business has suffered,
the corporate training part has managed to hold its own. For instance,
Tata Infotech saw the corporate training division's contribution
to its revenues swell from 5 per cent in March 2001 to 35 per cent
in December 2001. ''We believe corporate training is a far more
stable business,'' says the company's head of education services
Rahul Thapan, who is scripting a new corporate-focused business
model.
SSI
Kalpathi Suresh,
CEO
|
2001
|
2000
|
1999
|
REVENUES*
|
231
|
131
|
85
|
OPER. PROFIT
|
51
|
49
|
34
|
(In Rs crore, from the education business)
NUMBER OF CENTRES: 749
NUMBER OF COMPANIES-OWNED
CENTRES: 42
IMPACT OF SLOWDOWN: Revenues
up 76 per cent in FY 2000, but expected to fall by 25 per centwere
in FY 2002; workforce slashed between June and December 2001
by 30 per cent.
WHAT THE FUTURE
HOLDS: Wants to cement its position in short-term,
high-end courses. Allying with educational institutions to ensure
a steady stream of revenues. |
If Tata Infotech has sought to move up, others
have moved down. Both NIIT and yesterday's stockmarket favourite
SSI are focusing on the Rs 360-crore computer-literacy market, which
is estimated to grow almost 20 per cent this year.
Indeed, NIIT is confident that the consumer
business won't disappear anytime soon. For the quarter ended December
2001, it actually saw a 35 per cent increase in enrolments, courtesy
discounts that that were proffered for the first time ever. It is
also forging relationships with schools for basic programmes and
has already signed on 1,200 of them. ''Things are looking up for
us, even in the retail segment,'' says Pradeep Narayanan, Senior
Vice President, NIIT.
The others aren't as confident: Edutech has
pruned its rolls by an even 100; SSI has cut its workforce by 30
per cent over the last two quarters; even NIIT has slashed the workforce
of its education business by 30 per cent, although it refuses to
either deny or confirm the figure. ''As we are moving to a more
franchisee-centric system, more people are being transferred to
the centres,'' says an SSI spokesperson.
For companies in the IT education and training
business, 2002 could well mark the death of the lucrative middle-courses
targeted at wannabe programmers. To survive, says Ganesh Natarajan,
former CEO, Aptech, they'll have to ''focus on short-term and high-end
training courses, and leave the consumer courses to be taught in
colleges''.
-Additional inputs from Vinod
Mahanta
|