How
a quarter can change fortunes. In the second quarter of 2002-03,
not one equity mutual fund made a profit. Fast forward to quarter
ended December 31, and-lo and behold-95 per cent of the funds make
it home with not just gains, but an impressive average of over 11
per cent. Heck, even the scandal-rocked UTI managed to return to
the positive territory. And that despite a series of shocks in the
quarter. Alliance and Dundee announced plans to shut shop in India,
and IDBI and Zurich too were reported to be keen on getting out
of the mutual funds business. So, just what lifted funds' fortunes?
Answer: The rally in stockmarkets, led by the
return of the disinvestment story, and a spurt in tech stocks due
to a revival in it services growth. Bank stocks too gained, courtesy
the passage of the Securitisation Bill, which allows banks to now
seize assets of defaulters. Therefore, technology funds and funds
with higher exposure to tech stocks made the biggest gains. The
best performing fund Franklin Infotech Fund doled out a whopping
22.2 per cent return, with Pruicici Tech Funds snapping at its heels.
Oil PSU stocks again flared in the quarter, and smart fund managers
who had built up an exposure in those stocks made handsome gains.
The sob story of the quarter came from an unlikely sector, pharma.
All pharma funds except one made losses.
The trick in fund management, then, is not
just in superior stock selection. Timing is crucially important.
Ergo, while most of the fund managers have exposure to common stocks,
their returns differ because of the timing of their entry and exit
from a stock. In the balanced category, Zurich India Prudence Fund
fared the best and posted an absolute return of 13.90 percent in
the last quarter. This scheme is fairly consistent in its performance
and has been rewarding its unit holders well. The fund manager has
been maintaining a prudent mix of equity and debt, with exposure
to equity hovering just around 60 per cent. Gilts comprise around
13 per cent of the portfolio, while corporate debt papers constitute
the balance 27 per cent.
Bright And Cheerful
Talking about gilts, 'em shiny funds continued
to glitter, clocking an outstanding average return of 6.25 per cent.
KM K Gilt (Serial) 2019-Growth again dished out the maximum return
of 14.16 per cent, with Tata Gilt Securities Fund-Growth following
at 12.8 per cent. The best performing funds yet again were those
with a long-maturity profile. With interest rates falling, long-term
papers continued their march north resulting in handsome returns
to investors. But, investor, take care. The high growth rates do
not seem sustainable. KM K Gilt (Serial) 2019 has a very minuscule
fund size of 1.13 crore and the entire money is invested in just
one 17-year security. Tata Gilt manages Rs 150 crore of funds and
has invested around 80 per cent in gilts, more than half of which
have a maturity of about 20 years.
The Method Behind The Survey |
How we rank the funds.
BT-Mutualfundsindia.com has considered only those open-end
schemes (growth options) that have been present during the entire
timeframe considered. So, for equity and balanced funds, only
schemes having completed three years of regular NAV and portfolio
declaration were considered. For the Income and Gilt funds,
the study covers schemes that have been declaring regular NAVs
for the last two years, while in the Liquid Funds category,
only the schemes that have a life of more than one year have
been considered for the study. The schemes have been ranked
on their performance on the risk-return framework, while due
emphasis on the two components of success-average returns and
risk taken-has also been given.
RRR (Risk Return Rank)
Equity-based funds have been ranked on the basis of
Net Selectivity as calculated by the Eugene Fama Model
Debt based Funds have been ranked on the basis of Sharpe
Ratio
MRR (Mean Return Rank)
It is a ranking based on the average
daily return of the scheme over the period of study.
Risk Categorisation
The risk categorisation has been done
on the basis of daily standard deviation as follows:
Top 10 per cent of the universe with lowest standard deviation:
Very Low
Next 25 per cent of the universe: Low
Next 30 per cent of the universe: Medium
Next 25 per cent of the universe: High
Bottom 10 per cent of the universe with highest standard
deviation: Very High
|
Debt funds also continued down the winning course.
In general, it seemed that the higher a fund's exposure to long-dated
government securities, the better its returns. Escorts Income Bond
again was the best performer with a stellar return of 17 per cent,
but there are some issues with the fund. It has high volatility
and high NPAs, it makes irregular declaration of portfolios, and
its size is minuscule. Sundaram Select Debt-Dynamic Plan came in
at No. 2 with a return of 8.45 per cent. Around two-thirds of its
portfolio comprises government securities. Similarly, Templeton
Income Builder Account-Institutional Plan, PNB Debt Fund and Sundaram
Bond Saver, the other top performing funds in the category, also
have very high exposure to gilts. The average performance of all
debt funds was a healthy 3.5 per cent in the quarter. They continued
to post high returns in the wake of interest rate cuts.
Let's move on to liquid funds. As their name
suggests, liquid funds have to maintain a highly liquid portfolio,
sacrificing returns in the process. IL&Fs Liquid Fund Call Plan
was a surprise entry generating a return of 4.44 per cent in the
quarter. Others in the category managed a return in the range of
1.1 per cent to 1.95 per cent, with an average of over 1.55 per
cent. The public sector mutual funds seemed better than their private
sector counterparts at managing liquid funds. No wonder they ruled
the roost last quarter among top performing liquid funds.
A Tricky Balance
Managing investments is invariably about managing
the risk-return trade-off. The higher the risk, the higher the return
investors expect. On the basis of risk adjusted performance measure,
tax planning schemes and sector schemes were the best performers
for the three-year period among all equity-based schemes. An analysis
reveals that the funds posted returns higher than what was expected
of them on the basis of risk taken by the fund managers. The analysis
focuses on the returns generated by the fund managers due to superior
stock selection by subtracting the risk-free return and market sentiment
return from the total return generated by them.
In the equity category, tax schemes fared better
than normal schemes, since the fund managers have the liberty to
remain fully invested without worrying about redemption contingencies.
The top five schemes included one tax planning scheme, two sector
schemes of the UTI and two diversified funds-JM Basic Fund and Reliance
Vision. Reliance Vision has been a consistent performer and has
a diversified portfolio with exposure to mid-cap and small cap stocks.
JM Basic, although classified as a diversified fund, has its portfolio
completely stacked up with petroleum stocks. UTI dominates the list
of top performing schemes with three schemes.
In the balanced funds category, Canpremium
stole a march and displaced Templeton India Pension Plan from the
top position it attained in the previous quarter. Both the top performing
funds have been restricting exposures to equity and have about 60
per cent of their investment in debt and cash equivalents. And although
their three-year returns have not been very attractive, the schemes
have been able to diversify the risk for the investors.
Among debt funds, lower risk was the buzzword
in a declining interest rate scenario. The top performer on the
basis of risk adjusted return (calculated as the risk premium on
total risk assumed by the fund manager) was Grindlays SSIF-Short
Term that had taken the least risk. Its absolute return was not
the best, but it got the maximum score due to its consistency in
NAVs during volatile debt market conditions. Escorts Income fund
came in second by restricting the maximum portion of its portfolio
in state government securities, which showed less sensitivity to
interest rate movements. Birla Income Plus slipped from its top
slot in the previous quarter, but managed to stay among the best
five by posting decent returns along with lower volatility in the
NAVs.
In the gilts category, Alliance G-Sec led the
pack and wrested the top position from DSP ML G-Sec Short-Term Fund.
The DSP fund has been figuring on the list of toppers due to its
low risk profile, although it has not been generating very high
returns. The performance of the long-term offering from the same
fund house (DSP ML G Sec Long Duration) has been in sharp contrast.
It delivered its best performance yet, but still lagged at Number
3. The culprit: Its high risk.
Liquid funds too saw a new topper this quarter
with JM High Liquidity rising above all the others. Again the performance
in terms of returns was not very attractive, but because the risk
taken by the fund was very low, it scored over its peers. Templeton
India TMA offered better returns to investors when compared to JM
High Liquidity Fund for one-year time period, but stood at Number
2. Reliance Liquid and Grindlays Cash also made it to the top five
this quarter. jm High Liquidity has invested about 30 per cent in
call money and 70 per cent in debt of short maturities. The average
maturity of the portfolio stands at around 85 days, while Grindlays
Cash Fund is higher at 135 days as on December 31, 2002.
What's in store for the last quarter of 2002-03?
We don't want to hazard a guess on the specifics, but broadly equities
seem set for a comeback. There are several reasons for it. One,
Dalal Street expects fiscal year-end results to be in line with
its expectations, and some FIIs are likely to step up their exposure
to the Indian market. So go ahead, make your smart bets, but keep
your fingers crossed and eyes peeled.
|