| 
               
                |  |   
                | A Barista outlet: Storm in 
                  a coffee-cup |  Barista 
              Coffee' Company's (BCC) cup of woes continues to brim over. The 
              pioneering coffee chain has been besieged with problems, starting 
              with a business model that went haywire, followed by the exit of 
              its original promoter, Turner Morrison, and entry of Sterling Group's 
              C. Sivasankaran early this year. In between, it has seen two of 
              its CEOs go: the first being Ravi Deol (the man blamed for Barista's 
              losses) in May 2003 and the second his successor, Yogesh Samat, 
              who resigned early this month. To top it all, there are strong rumours 
              that Tata Coffee (which owns 34.3 per cent of the company's equity) 
              may want out too.   Though Tata Coffee 
              has denied sell-off reports, the market is abuzz that international 
              coffee chain Starbucks has been sounded out by the Tata Group. But 
              the moot point is, would Starbucks be interested? Unlikely. This 
              business is all about brands. Why would Starbucks want to trade 
              in its own equity for Barista's in India? A cafe's competency is 
              location, and here too there are enough of high-street locations 
              still available, so Barista again can offer very little to Starbucks. 
              It has been Starbucks' philosophy to enter new markets, such as 
              China, which it did in 2002, on its own steam or at best with a 
              super-franchisee a la McDonald's in India. And it is here that Barista 
              can, hypothetically, fit in nicely as the back-end company running 
              the Starbucks brand in India. An Indian coffee chain brand would 
              have been killed, but investors would have salvaged some value.  
              -Shailesh Dobhal 
  A 
              Costly Game To PlayIt costs advertisers a hell of a lot of money 
              to buy cricket. So why is no one complaining?
 
               
                |  |  At close to Rs 11-12-crore 
              a day, the recent auction of four-year (108 days) live telecast 
              rights of international cricket matches in India by the Board of 
              Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), raises some fundamental questions. 
              Like, has cricket become too expensive for both broadcasters as 
              well as advertisers? Ever since Sony Television's Max bid $225-million 
              (Rs 1,097-crore at 2002 exchange rates) for the International Cricket 
              Council rights from 2002 to 2007, there has been an upward spiral 
              in acquisition costs, with the current BCCI bids drawing $260-million 
              (1,214-crore) from Zee, and $230-million (Rs 1,074-crore) from ESPN-Star 
              Sports. "The inflation in cricket advertising costs is largely 
              because of irrational bidding by competing broadcasters," says 
              C.V.L. Srinivas, Managing Director of Group M media-buying company, 
              Maxus. Why isn't anyone complaining? "For cricket, viewership 
              in India is absolute and confirmed," says Kunal Dasgupta, MD, 
              SET India. Advertisers agree. There already are some 1,600 brands 
              riding on cricket and their number is growing 35 per cent year-on-year, 
              compared to 20 per cent for overall TV advertising. Not surprisingly, 
              Zee expects Rs 800 crore of profits from the BCCI deal. -Shailesh Dobhal 
 ''BPOs And Net Phone Networks 
              Are The Latest Targets'' Every 
              year, dozens of big and small computer viruses attack networks worldwide. 
              Most cause temporary and minor damage, but some end up crippling 
              networks. Like MSBlast, which hit the networks last year and immediately 
              threw it infrastructure of companies out of gear. One of the companies 
              that's made a billion-dollar business out of protecting computers 
              is McAfee. Recently, its Chairman and CEO, 
              George Samenuk, was in India and spoke to BT's Venkatesha 
              Babu on emerging industry trends. Excerpts:  How do anti-virus companies sell without 
              coming off as zealots scaring people into buying their technology? (Smiles) Yes, aren't we a bit like the insurance 
              people? But enterprises are realising the kind of losses inflicted 
              by business opportunity lost because of viruses. So an investment 
              in protecting oneself is understandable.  The industry is seen as offering merely 
              anti-virus and firewall protection, and not being pro-active enough. 
              What is your defence? That is a very simplistic way of looking at 
              things. McAfee has moved beyond being reactive to being a pro-active 
              player, offering services like intrusion detection and intrusion 
              prevention. We try to keep ourselves a step ahead of the bad guys, 
              but with several hundred viruses coming out all the time it is a 
              tough thing to do. People don't appreciate that.  How does India fit into McAfee's global 
              plans? We have been in India for the past couple of 
              years. This visit is related to our setting up a research lab, which 
              will work on software to detect and prevent viruses, SPAM and worms 
              coming out all the time. We have 400 people working in India, which 
              is more than 10 per cent of our global workforce of around 3,100 
              people. We have a technical support centre in India, which supports 
              our global customers. In some of our recent releases, the Indian 
              centre has contributed nearly a third to product development.   Is the Indian market (estimated at Rs 240 
              crore) for virus protection growing? The Indian market is growing significantly. 
              With the number of BPOs present that work 24x7, any attack can be 
              devastating. Indian BPOs are signing up with us. Also with a number 
              of IP telephony networks increasing in enterprises, demand for our 
              products and services in India are also going up significantly. 
              The BPO industry and the phone networks are the latest targets. 
 Should It Be Stock, Or Soya?Volumes in commodities trading have touched 
              Rs 1,500 crore. And they're rising fast.
 
               
                |  |   
                | Commodities trading: Looking 
                  up |  After 
              a bumpy start, commodity markets in India have finally started looking 
              up. And the combined volume of the three national commodity exchanges 
              (National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX), Mumbai, Multi 
              Commodity Exchange (MCX), Mumbai and National Multi Commodities 
              Exchange (NMCE), Ahmedabad has already reached levels of Rs 1,500 
              crore. For a market that's only just opened up, that compares well 
              with average daily stockmarket volumes of Rs 13,000 crore. Stockbrokers 
              who've ventured into this virgin territory are obviously ecstatic. 
              "It has already reached 25-30 per cent of our stockmarket volumes," 
              says Satish Menon, coo, Geojit Securities.  Gold and silver are contributing the majority 
              of volume. Not surprising because these are standard commodities 
              and serve as international currency. But transactions in other commodities 
              (especially agricultural ones) are increasing rapidly. Products 
              like guar seeds (13 per cent), soya (12 per cent), and rubber (4 
              per cent) are among the high-volume generators. More importantly, 
              retail participation in these commodities is also very high. That's 
              good news because it means the real beneficiaries-farmers and users 
              of these agricultural products- have finally cottoned onto commodities.  -Narendra Nathan |