f o r    m a n a g i n g    t o m o r r o w
SEARCH
 
DEC 19, 2004
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 Bookend
 Personal Finance
 Managing
 BT Special
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Cities On The Edge
Favoured business destinations Gurgaon, Bangalore, Chennai, Pune and Hyderabad could become, thanks to poor infrastructure, victims of their own success. Read in-depth articles on each city. Plus personalised travel logs. Only at www.business-today.com.


Moving On
Diluting stake in GECIS was like a child growing up and leaving home, feels Scott R. Bayman, President and CEO of GE India. In an exclusive interview with BT, he speaks his mind on a wide range of issues.

More Net Specials
Business Today,  December 5, 2004
 
 
Investing In Mutual Funds
Mutual fund investment is not as easy as it once was. The advice you need.

Mutual funds (MFs), which pool people's money to make collective investments, were meant to make life easy for retail investors. Their central promise of relief: no stock-picking headaches. Remember those days? Well, things change. And how. Now investors complain of mf-picking headaches, and they're not faking it either. It's understandable. So fast and furiously have funds proliferated in India over the past decade or so, that knowing your way around the maze is a skill in itself.

Counting both open- and close-ended schemes, the Indian investor has a choice of some 400 schemes. Add optional diversity within schemes (dividend, growth, bonus, et al), you have over 1,000 choices, as if all the other terms (growth, value, blend and so on) were not complicating enough.

So what, alas, does an ordinary simplicity-seeking investor do? Consider the following options.

Fund Of Funds

This describes a fund that invests the pooled corpus in a portfolio of other MFs (usually five or more), resulting in some rather wide diversification. To gain the most from this idea, you must go for a fund of funds that invests in MFs across the industry on the basis of merit, rather than just in funds promoted by its own fund house (a common practice).

"The tax-advantage if you follow this route is also enormous," adds Ajay Bagga, CEO, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund. For example, the investor doesn't have to pay any tax when money reallocation happens (usually at the end of every quarter), since that's not a transaction in which the investor has directly participated.

Another advantage: you can start with small sums of money. Even a thousand rupees, in some cases, is enough to get yourself a fund of funds. Of course, it will not relieve you of all investment decisions. You must take your own decision on when to enter and exit the fund-so you must have an investment strategy of your own of some sort, and must keep an eye of the broad Sensex direction. That's inescapable.

Portfolio Management Services (PMS)

MF gurus (from L to R) Bajaj Capital's Rajiv Bajaj, Kotak Mahindra's Ajay Bagga and Parag Parikh's Nimish Shah

Don't be surprised, but it's true. Now portfolio management services (PMS) are available to mf investors as well. How does this work? In effect, like a personalised fund of funds. You give money to the PMS agency, which tailors an mf portfolio for you to suit your specific needs (in terms of risk capacity and return requirements, mainly). The portfolio is shuffled around by your PMS manager at frequent intervals, to ensure your goals are met. If it is focussed on your needs sharply enough, and your manager is independent, it will beat the same-house bias that fund of funds tend to have (they prefer their own schemes). "Most of the fund of funds in India invest only in schemes from the same fund house, defeating its very own purpose," alleges Sharad Shukla, Head (Investment Advisory Services), IL&Fs Investsmart. To avoid that altogether, "go only for independent research houses", advises Nimish Shah, Director and CEO, Parag Parikh Financial Advisory Services.

Like all specialised financial services of this kind, you need big money for it (at least Rs 5 lakh). Otherwise, the only drawback is its tax-inefficiency. Transactions are treated as yours, specifically, which makes portfolio reallocations expensive.

What you need to watch out for is any conflict of interest between you and your advisor

Personal MF Advisors

For absolutely personalised advice, you could actually consult experts the way people do for other investments. The advice, as with stocks, is offered on the basis of your risk profile and investment horizon, and mf identification is done on the basis of returns' consistency, and the ability to meet financial goals. "For example, a fund might be performing very well, but it might not be suitable for an investor if the volatility is very high and that does not match his investment profile," says Amit Sah, Director (Marketing), Global Consumer Group, Citigroup.

Needs keep changing too as you go along. "An overall wealth creation strategy is required," says Rajiv Bajaj, Managing Director, Bajaj Capital, "as the financial products that are ideal for you now may not suit you after some time."

Investment banks and other financial groups offer such advice as part of their private banking operations to high net-worth individuals. Mutual fund distributors offer such advice to smaller investors too. What you need to watch out for, again, is any conflict of interest (between the advisor and you). And remember, tax-inefficiency is applicable here as well. That apart, the advice could help.


Sectoral Savvy
Sector-specific mutual funds are specialised vehicles. Does that help performance?

Pharma funds: Particularly focussed limelight

Sectoral mutual funds (MFs), went the logic, should do well simply on account of knowledge specialisation. So, have they? For the most part, yes. Sectoral fund investors have worn a wide smile for some time now. But this could be because they happened to pick the hot and happening sectors, rather than any special expertise on the part of their fund managers. To test just how well funds have actually performed, compare their returns with that of benchmark indices specific to their sectors.

The most interesting story of index-beating lies in the FMCG sector. The BSE FMCG index gave a negative 1.1 per cent return over the past one year. But almost all FMCG funds have delivered excellent returns. Fund managers are quite discerning in their picks, it seems.

Pharma funds have also beaten the sectoral index. The BSE HC (healthcare) Index returned 26 per cent over the past year, but SBI Pharma Fund outperformed this index heartily, delivering a return of 65 per cent over the past year. Yet, argues Sandip Sabarwal, Fund Manager, FMCG & Pharma Funds, SBI Mutual Fund: "Since some indices are overweight on a few top companies, investors could track peer group funds apart from the sectoral indices."

The banking, PSU, and oil and gas sectors have similar stories to tell. A curious case is that of it sector funds. Now, these funds have also done rather well. They topped the entire equity funds category. Yet, they failed to beat the BSE IT index. They returned between 29 and 44 per cent over the past six months, while the BSE returned in excess of 46 per cent. How come? The weightage assigned to top tech stocks-namely Infosys, Wipro, TCS and Satyam-in the free-float BSE IT index is 90 per cent (with Infosys alone 50 per cent). And these have been the top performers too, even as fund managers preferred to diversify their holdings. Says Rushab Seth, Head of Equities, Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund: "Mutual funds, by definition, are meant to diversify risk. If one skews the portfolio in favour of too few stocks, one loses the objective of a fund completely."

 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | BOOKEND | PERSONAL FINANCE
MANAGING | BT SPECIAL | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BT-Mercer-TNS—The Best Companies To Work For In India

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS
ARCHIVESCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY