|
Common ground: (L-R) Nadir Godrej,
MD, Godrej Industries; Nitin Anturkar; David Friedman; Debu
Bhattacharya; R. Sridharan, Deputy Editor, Business Today;
B. Muthuraman; R. Seshasayee; Ranajoy Punja and Mangesh Korgaonkar |
Last
year, china exported an estimated $540 billion (Rs 23,76,000 crore)
worth of manufactured goods. India, by comparison, managed a modest
$55 billion (Rs 2,42,000 crore). Don't lose hope, though. By 2015,
according to McKinsey estimates, exports of Indian-made goods
could soar to a staggering $300 billion (Rs 13,20,000 crore).
However, if that has to happen, Indian manufacturers will, first
of all, need to expand production capacity. But more importantly,
they will need to pull their technology up by the bootstraps.
Technology in product innovation and development, and technology
in manufacturing.
To get a sense of what's happening in Indian
manufacturing, Business Today invited some of India's biggest
manufacturers and experts to brainstorm on "How technology
can make Indian manufacturing competitive". Turning up on
the dot for the 8:00 a.m. Business Today Boardroom Breakfast session
in Mumbai were: B. Muthuraman, MD, Tata Steel; Debu Bhattacharya,
MD, Hindalco; R. Seshasayee, MD, Ashok Leyland; David Friedman,
President and MD, Ford India; Nitin Anturkar, Executive VP, taco
Engineering; Mangesh Korgaonkar, ICICI Chair Professor at the
Shailesh J. Mehta School in IIT Bombay; and Ranajoy Punja, VP
(Marketing), Cisco.
The panel moderator and BT's Deputy Editor,
R. Sridharan, kicked off the discussion by asking the speakers
to give a quick insight into what strategic objectives technology
fulfils at their respective organisations. According to Tata Steel's
Muthuraman, technology was important for two broad reasons. One,
to make the product globally competitive and, two, to bring newer
products and more value to the consumer. Citing Tata Steel's own
example, he talked about how, by going in for newer processes
despite the initial high cost of investment, the company was benefiting
from increased productivity today.
|
"There's
an inverse relationship between tariffs and technology inflow.
So, one has to own technology in critical areas"
R. SESHASAYEE
MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASHOK LEYLAND |
|
"Technology
is crucial to make your product globally competitive and enhance
value offering to customers"
B. MUTHURAMAN
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
TATA STEEL |
|
"Technology
is an enabler in making good products... (thanks to that)
the customer is no longer treated as a guinea pig"
DAVID FRIEDMAN
PRESIDENT & MANAGING DIRECTOR, FORD INDIA |
|
"We have
to focus on appropriate technology... the attitude of 'get
a good technology and it will solve your problems' won't do"
DEBU BHATTACHARYA
MANAGING DIRECTOR, HINDALCO |
|
"With
increasing prices and customers looking for cost reductions,
technology becomes important for survival"
NITIN ANTURKAR
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TACO ENGINEERING |
|
"While
Indian manufacturers have significantly improved on quality,
they still have a long way to go"
MANGESH KORGAONKAR
PROFESSOR, IIT BOMBAY |
|
"It's
not just about implementing technology, but the technology
has to be coupled with business innovation"
RANAJOY PUNJA
VICE PRESIDENT (MARKETING), CISCO SYSTEMS |
Taking on from Muthuraman, Ashok Leyland's
Seshasayee said that in the auto industry, technology was not
a differentiator but a qualifier. Yet, till the early 90s, he
pointed out, there was a lag between what the market wanted and
what the market got, since all technology-related decisions were
decided by somebody sitting in the corridors of power in Delhi.
And when the markets opened up, technology wasn't easy to access.
"I believe there is an inverse relationship between tariffs
and technology inflow," he said. How did Ashok Leyland cope
with the challenges? By making two critical decisions back then.
One was to develop technological skills on its own in critical
areas and, two, also leverage the collaborator's technology (Iveco,
in this case).
Moving away from what had been said so far,
Hindalco's Bhattacharya talked about instances when technology
doesn't work. Citing examples from Hindalco, he warned against
pursuing technology that weren't market-focussed. "The attitude
is, 'Get a good technology and it will solve your problems'-it
won't. We have to get technology and adapt ourselves and our processes
appropriately. Business should drive technology and not vice-versa,"
he said
Moving back to the automobile industry, David
Friedman of Ford India noted how things had changed from the days
when they would design a car and then hope manufacturing could
make it. Today, that was not the case. "Technology becomes
an enabler in making a good product. Not only does it contribute
to the design, but even the quality of inputs has improved due
to technology. For example, today cars don't rust," he pointed
out. In the olden days, the final customer did a lot of diagnosis
of identifying problems. Thanks to technology, that doesn't happen
any more. "We can check all of it scientifically. We no longer
treat the customer as a guinea pig," he said.
According to Nitin Anturkar of Taco Engineering,
technology is not a facilitator but a tool for survival. "With
increasing prices and customers looking for cost reductions, technology
becomes important for survival. Something as simple as reducing
cost and waste on shop floor involves tremendous amount of innovation,"
he said. Appropriate use of technology could also save unnecessary
capital expenditure, he noted. "Do we need a new plant when
we can improve productivity in the old one?" he asked.
Professor Mangesh Korgaonkar spoke about
his studies on what contributes to competitiveness of manufacturing.
While he was happy to note that Indian manufacturers had significantly
improved on quality, he felt that they had a long way to go in
terms of world-class quality. "At present, Indian manufacturers
don't score over 30 on a scale of 100 in terms of global capabilities,"
he said. Drawing comparisons with China, he said that Chinese
manufacturing had moved from factor-driven to investment-driven
advantage and thus would be harder to beat.
Cisco's Ranajoy Punja had the final word
in the discussion. He felt that for Indian manufacturing to be
competitve, it must understand market conditions, customer service,
etc. "It's not just about implementing technology, but the
technology has to be coupled with business innovation," he
said. A point Indian manufacturers would do well to remember.
|