| Even 
                as airbus industrie created aviation history last fortnight by 
                successfully putting to air its biggest jumbo aircraft thus far, 
                the A380-it can seat 555 passengers in a typical three-class configuration-its 
                losing streak in the aviation market only seemed to get worse. 
                Its most recent setback, of course, has been in India, where flagship 
                carrier Air-India (a-i), picked American rival Boeing over Airbus 
                for a $6.9-billion (Rs 30,360-crore) deal to purchase 50 new aircraft. 
                Not surprisingly, Airbus is crying foul, saying that bid conditions 
                were changed at the last minute to favour Boeing, and that its 
                two latest planes-the A350 and the A380-were not even considered. 
                The European aircraft maker has even demanded a vigilance enquiry 
                into the decision.  But could it be that the Boeing 
                787 Dreamliner is actually a better option for carriers? Going 
                purely by the Chicago-based manufacturer's recent wins, the answer 
                seems to be yes. Air Canada recently placed a $15-billion (Rs 
                66,000-crore) order for 96 Boeing planes, including 14 787s. So 
                have Japan Airlines (30 787s), Korean Air (14), and six different 
                Chinese airlines (for 60 787s). Indeed, of the 50 planes (15 are 
                optional) that A-I plans to buy, 27 are 787s (of the other 23, 
                15 are 777-300er long-range aircraft and eight 777-200lr ultra 
                long-haul jetliners). The 787's USP? It is 20 per cent more fuel 
                efficient compared to the current generation jetliners like the 
                Airbus A330 and costs one-third less in maintenance, because of 
                its lightweight composite building materials and improved engines 
                (besides, it offers wireless on-board systems). But Nigel Harwood, 
                Airbus' Vice President (Sales), Indian subcontinent and South 
                Asia, says that the plane most suitable for India is the A380, 
                "which is 31 per cent more economical than the 787 and will 
                be available for delivery from 2006 onwards".  There's still a ray of hope for Airbus. The 
                deal, while cleared by the A-I board, now needs the Government 
                of India's approval. Let's see if it can come up with any last-minute 
                surprise manoeuvres.  -Sahad P.V. and Kushan Mitra 
 LIFTA-I's Belated Take Off
 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | A-I CMD V. Thulasidas: Buckle up |  The 
                last time Air-India (A-I) expanded its fleet was about 15 years 
                ago. The 38 aircraft in its fleet today have an average age of 
                13, with only 36 in active service. As a result, despite having 
                15,500 (fy2004) people on its payroll and rights to fly to over 
                100 countries around the world, A-I is a white elephant, with 
                Rs 5,897 crore in revenues and Rs 900 crore in accumulated losses 
                till last year (it did make Rs 92 crore in net profits, though, 
                last year). In the recent years, it has lost market share on key 
                sectors to foreign carriers such as Emirates and Singapore Airlines. 
                The Boeing order for 50 aircraft, then, is like a lucky wind that 
                could see the carrier gain market share on the lucrative India-us 
                and India-Europe routes. The only catch: Deliveries don't start 
                until 2006 (the 787s come much later in 2008), by when even local 
                rivals like Jet Airways and Air Sahara, which have been allowed 
                to fly international destinations, would have muscled their way 
                onto A-I's turf. -Kushan Mitra 
 Q&A"It Takes Time To Become Global"
 After 
                37 years with the HSBC group, 
                David Eldon retires in May as the Chairman of the Hongkong 
                and Shanghai Banking Corporation. An old Asia hand, Eldon spoke 
                to BT's R. Sridharan on banking 
                in India and Asia. Excerpts:  India would like Mumbai to be at least 
                an Asian financial hub. How would you rate its chances? It's a fairly complex answer. If you want 
                to be a financial hub, you first have to decide who's your customer 
                and who's your competition. The latter would be Hong Kong or Japan 
                or Singapore. The financial hubs of the future would be Shanghai 
                and Seoul. What do you need to be a financial hub? A legal structure 
                that's quick and transparent, international expertise and a market-friendly 
                regulatory structure, which allows banks to come in.  So how would you rate Mumbai on these 
                parameters? I would honestly have to put Mumbai closer 
                to the bottom of the list of existing or upcoming financial hubs. 
                But I am not saying it can't be done. Only that it needs a lot 
                of work.  Do you see a global bank coming out of 
                India in five or 10 years time? It takes a long time to be a global force. 
                In fact, there are hardly any global banks... we clearly are one. 
                Even if you look at some major European banks, they are not global. 
                They may have offices internationally, but I don't think they 
                could say that they do business in all of them. If we use that 
                as a clarification, there's no reason why some of the major Indian 
                banks cannot become international, without necessarily being global 
                banks. 
 Bt Cotton's AllyFarmers in Andhra rally around the crop.
 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | Advantage BT cotton: Higher yield, 
                    lower costs |  Ever 
                since BT cotton seeds were first introduced in India in 1996 and 
                approved for commercial production in 2002, there have been restless 
                debates over it. The debates have ranged from the safety of using 
                biotechnology in agriculture to cotton productivity to MNC domination 
                of seed supplies. But slowly, the popular opinion seems to be 
                leaning towards Bt cotton. (It's called Bt because the seed uses 
                an insect-resistant gene from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis.) 
                The support is coming from a state that has witnessed a large 
                number of farmer suicides-Andhra Pradesh. "Farmers who have 
                used Bt cotton are now reporting better yields," says S. 
                Jaipal Reddy, Chairman (Cotton Commodity), Confederation of Indian 
                Farmers' Associations.  In Andhra, the total area under cotton crop, 
                according to Reddy, is between 20 lakh acres and 25 lakh acres. 
                Of this, 1.90 lakh acres was under Bt cotton in 2004. Compare 
                this with 2002, when out of 18 to 20 lakh acres under cotton, 
                only 6,800 acres was planted with Bt cotton. This year, Bt cotton 
                may be grown in over 10 lakh acres, Reddy reckons. The Bt cotton 
                advantages: higher yield and lower (pesticide) costs. At between 
                eight quintals and 12 quintals per acre, Bt cotton, Reddy claims, 
                yields 20 per cent more. Abuse of the crop could be disastrous 
                for Indian farmers. Not interspersing Bt cotton crop with non-Bt 
                cotton crop can lead to a new variety of pests that are resistant 
                to all pesticides.  -E. Kumar Sharma 
  The 
                BT 50 IndexDespite a jittery fortnight, there are signs 
                of a consolidation.
 With 
                diverse corporate results-some good, others disappointing-pouring 
                in, the market remained extremly volatile this fortnight as well. 
                But with the overall results generally on expected lines, the 
                BT 50 remained flat at 235.87 points. However, the credit policy 
                (RBI increased the reverse repo rate by 25 basis points) impacted 
                bank stocks, which fell by 2.78 per cent. Also with OPEC's support, 
                global oil prices have gone below $50 (Rs 2,200) per barrel. With 
                no spike expected in the short term, the stock market can breathe 
                easy.  Our flagship free float methodology-based 
                index-BT 50-has completed two years now. The free float methodology 
                has several advantages: first, it considers only the value of 
                stocks freely available in the market (after excluding the part 
                held by promoters and other strategic investors) and the weightage 
                assigned to individual shares is more representative than the 
                market capitalisation-based methodology; second, it takes care 
                of the perpetual selection dilemma regarding closely-held companies. 
                For instance, the inclusion of these companies may distort the 
                index based on total market capitalisation methodology, but dropping 
                them altogether may reduce its representative character. The free 
                float methodology facilitates inclusion of large closely-held 
                companies but assigns them a lesser weightage. After the success 
                of our broad market free float index (that the Sensex subsequently 
                decided to adopt this is testimony to the efficacy of the free 
                float method), we decided to launch sector indices using the same 
                method. While the general index captures the overall movements 
                (covering several sectors), sector indices capture the movements 
                in individual sectors. All these indices have a common base period 
                (January 1, 2002). The weightages are reassigned every quarter 
                after companies declare their ownership details. The base value 
                of all BT indices is 100. -Narendra Nathan |