|
Rajendra Pawar Chairman, NIIT: Thanks
to his new strategy NIIT has managed to up its share in a shrinking
market |
Hi,
I am Raji, and I am building NIIT'' reads the name-badge NIIT Chairman
Rajendra Pawar wears. This financial year (NIIT's year ends in September)
has given Pawar the opportunity to not just build the company's
education business, but also rebuild parts of it.
For the first 19 years of its life NIIT was
seemingly on a roll. For instance, in 1999-2000, the education business
generated revenues of Rs 625 crore and returned operating profits
of Rs 138 crore, up from Rs 481 crore and Rs 106 crore the previous
year. Then, the US economy went into recession, companies there
cut their it-spends, and Indian software services companies focussed
on that market went into maintenance mode. Bench-strength swelled
across India's finest software companies. And they reduced their
intake of fresh software professionals.
Suddenly (for the first time in a decade) the
market had a surfeit of software professionals (a mere 12,000, but
still a surplus; see Demand For Software Pros).
''The slowdown had hit all major exports but
it was most visible in it because of the preceding hype,'' says
P. Rajendran, NIIT's Chief Operating Officer. That perception, says
Raju (as Rajendran is known within the company), ''led to wrong
decisions and one of these had to do with (people) putting off their
decision to imbibe it education.''
Is This A Blip
Or A Failure?
|
Last year, 2001, wasn't a great one
for NIIT. But was the company feeling the temporary impact
of the IT slowdown, or were its problems more long term. NIIT
Chairman Rajendra S. Pawar and Chief Operating Officer P.
rajendran reason it is more the former than the latter.
POINT
» The decline
in IT education could be long term
»
IT education
will revive well after the software sector
»
The emerging
crop of school students will already be IT literate and may
not need to go to NIIT or other IT training companies
»
NIIT has been
among the worst hit by the slowdown in IT education
COUNTERPOINT
»
NIIT
sees a revival kicking off in the middle of 2002
»
The lag between the two will not necessarily be there
»
NIIT already has a programme targeting
schools; besides IT is an evolving subject and even NIIT changes
its curriculum to keep pace
»
It has gained marketshare and focussed on innovations; it
has also pared wasteful expenditure
|
Expectedly, NIIT's revenues from the education
business dipped from Rs 625 crore in 2000 to Rs 509 crore in 2001;
its operating profits from Rs 138 crore to Rs 20 crore.
Even before September 2001, though, NIIT had
firmed up on its strategy to tackle the slowdown. From developing
the market, a task it had taken upon itself in its role as the market
leader, NIIT decided it would focus on grabbing share from its competitors.
That wasn't an easy decision to make, but as
Pawar puts it, ''if you are walking upstream, and there is a cloudburst,
it is best to run for cover faster than others.''
Tackling The Slowdown
Translating the strategy into action necessitated
launching a marketing blitz. NIIT introduced four new technologies
between May 2001 and January 2002; launched six new programmes between
February 2001 and December 2001; expanded its network from 2,228
centres in March 2001 to 2,497 centres in December 2001; increased
its reach among schools; focussed on a slew of customer-centric
initiatives such as education loans and money-back offers; and increased
its spending on branding, advertising, and marketing.
The results have started appearing in statistics:
enrolments are up (See How NIIT Weathered The Blues), even in career-oriented
courses (registrations seen in the July-September quarter of 2001
were the highest ever); and among the top three it education companies-NIIT,
Aptech, and SSI, in that order-NIIT gained relative marketshare.
Detractors-and this includes several equity
analysts-point out that NIIT's increasing marketshare doesn't count
for much in a declining market. A report put out by the Business
Consulting Group estimates that enrolments shrunk by 17 per cent
in 2001-02 over 2000-01, and revenues by 35 per cent.
And even a recovery in the US economy, says
one investment banker will not improve the sector's fortunes in
a hurry. ''We believe a demand upturn in education will emerge,''
he says, ''but it could come with a lag, and a long one at that
in current oversupply conditions.''
NIIT disagrees with both sets of analyses.
It points to the 2002 edition of Nasscom's annual survey of the
Indian it industry to prove its point. According to this report
(See Demand For Software Pros), the ''oversupply'' was a mere 12,000
software pros in 2001-02.
Better still, Nasscom projections at their
most optimistic put demand exceeding supply by 533,500. Even the
least optimistic estimate has demand exceeding supply by 64,000.
Interestingly, these numbers do not include the demand for software
professionals in it-enabled services in India-a business that actually
grew by an estimated 70 per cent in 2001-02.
In the light of these numbers NIIT's take about
2001-02 being an one-off bad year rings true. Ergo, IT education
does seem to be on sound ground in the long-term.
|
"The slowdown had hit all major exports,
but it was most visible in IT because of preceding hype"
P. Rajendran, Chief Operating
Officer, NIIT |
Marketshare Matters
The numbers in the Nasscom survey are also
borne out by the feeling among analysts that the worst is over for
the Indian software sector. Raji (both he and Raju are alumni of
the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi) is actually willing to
venture his estimate on when the IT education business will be able
to get back on track-the middle of this year.
While waiting for that to happen, NIIT is busy
innovating: it has focussed on e-learning and pared wasteful expenditure
in areas like travel and communication.
Much like GE, says Pawar, which once upped
profits by $1.5 billion despite stagnating revenues, NIIT is focussing
on getting the most out of its operations.
And if the market moves out of its doomsday-perception
of the future of the software business, he adds, ''there will not
necessarily be a lag (between the revival in software services and
that in the information technology education business).''
Does marketshare matter all that much in a
bad year? Actually it does, especially in a business like it education.
Most companies operate through franchisees
and the permanence of these centres makes the business highly capital
intensive from the franchisees' point of view. That means capacity
utilisation is critical: a low capacity utilisation could force
franchisees to defect or exit the business altogether.
That, says Pawar, is one reason behind NIIT's
introduction of shorter term beginners courses like NIIT Swift Jyoti
(targeted at housewives). The revenue from these courses may be
low, but they do keep the capacity utilisation high.
In effect, NIIT seems to be using the slowdown
to make its own operations more efficient, and gain marketshare
at the expense of its rivals while the rest of the industry goes
through a catharsis of sorts with some smaller companies being forced
to down their shutters. Already, the presence of the unorganised
sector in the it education business has shrunk.
Consequently, when the revival does happen-and
no one, not even the most Cassandra-like among analysts denies that
it will-NIIT will be better placed to leverage the resulting boom.
Meantime, the company continues to focus on
market development in the global arena.
In China, for instance, where it has alliances
with six universities and three software technology parks, NIIT
recently crossed the 50-centre mark.
So, does all this mean it education is alive
and kicking? Ask Raji, and a trace of vehemence creeps into his
voice: ''it education is dead if education for humans is dead. I'd
like someone to convince me that education for humans is dead.''
|