|   Our company is considering the acquisition of shares of a company 
              that has an STP unit enjoying tax benefits under Section 10(A) of 
              the Income Tax Act. After we acquire the shares, can the STP unit 
              continue to enjoy such tax benefits?  
              The STP unit can avail tax benefits under Section 10(A) of the Income 
              Tax Act, 1961, if your company acquires not more than 49 per cent 
              of the total voting power in the company that owns the STP unit. 
              The STP unit will continue to enjoy such tax exemptions if on the 
              last day of any previous year, the shares representing at least 
              51 per cent of the voting power are held by the same shareholders 
              who held the shares representing at least 51 per cent of the voting 
              power on the last day of the year in which the STP unit was set 
              up. The acquisition of voting power greater than 49 per cent will 
              not disentitle the STP unit from tax deduction under Section 10(A) 
              if the transfer results from disinvestment by a VC company or VC 
              fund in favour of your company.   We are a software company and wish to market 
              our software through a shrink-wrap licence method. Will the terms 
              of such a licence be enforceable? A shrink-wrap licence is enforceable like any 
              other contract if (i) it is made by the free consent of the parties, 
              (ii) the parties are competent to contract, (iii) there was communication 
              of offer and acceptance, (iv) the object and consideration for the 
              licence is lawful, and (v) the licence is not declared void under 
              other provisions of the Indian Contract Act. The main consideration, 
              with respect to a shrink-wrap licence, is the time of acceptance 
              of the terms of the licence. Judicial decisions hold that as long 
              as the person who received the product was made aware of the fact 
              that there were certain conditions governing the transaction, even 
              if these conditions were stated in small print on the product, such 
              person would be bound by the terms thereof. Therefore, a party would 
              be held to have communicated its acceptance to the terms and conditions 
              of the sale and would be bound if he was aware that the software 
              package contained a licence agreement but nevertheless purchased 
              the software.  Our company intends to hold 100 per cent 
              equity in a private company proposed to be set up as an wholly-owned 
              subsidiary of our company. Can we hold beneficial interest in the 
              shares through a nominee in the subsidiary company? Your company can hold shares in the subsidiary 
              through nominees. If the shares are held by nominees, your company 
              and its nominee(s) will need to file declarations with the subsidiary 
              specifying the particulars of your company as the holder of beneficial 
              interest in the shares, the nature of your company's interest in 
              those shares and particulars of the nominee(s) in whose name the 
              shares are registered. These declarations have to be made within 
              30 days of the holding of shares by the nominee(s) on behalf of 
              your company. The subsidiary will also have to note these declarations 
              in its register of members and file certain forms with the Registrar 
              of Companies within 30 days of receipt of the declarations from 
              your company and its nominee(s).  We are joint venture partners in a company. 
              Our partner has filed a petition for its winding up due to disputes. 
              Can we request the court to refer the winding up petition for adjudication 
              by arbitration?  Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 
              only disputes or matters on which the arbitrator is competent or 
              empowered to decide can be referred for arbitration. The power to 
              order the winding up of a company is derived from the Companies 
              Act and conferred on the court alone. An arbitrator, notwithstanding 
              any agreement between the parties, does not have the jurisdiction 
              to order the winding up of a company. The court may not refer the 
              winding up petition for adjudication through arbitration.   You can, however, request the court to refer 
              the disputes to arbitration-as under the Shareholders Agreement 
              disputes are subject to settlement by arbitration-and stay the winding 
              up proceedings. 
  The views expressed here should not be construed 
              as legal opinion and is for reference only. Business Today and/or 
              the author will not be responsible for any decision taken by readers 
              on the basis of these views. Please send in your queries to Legal.bt@intoday.com 
              or Going By the Book, c/o Business Today, F-26, Connaught Place, 
              New Delhi-110001. |