| The 
              numbers are going d-street's way. Bombay stock Exchange's Sensex 
              breached its 26-month high of 3721 on July 14, before closing at 
              3686.34 on July 15, the day this magazine went to press. The first 
              number is around 25 per cent higher than the low of 2997.87 it touched 
              barely three months ago, on April 11. In the same period National 
              Stock Exchange's broad-based index, S&P CNX 500 is up 32 per 
              cent. And the BT 50, India's only free-float index, up 29.3 per 
              cent. On BSE that's some Rs 1,87,402 crore of market value added 
              in 55 trading days.   The finance ministry, edgy after a series of 
              annual stockmarket scams, asked India's capital markets watchdog, 
              Securities and Exchange Board of India to investigate whether this 
              bull-run had speculative origins. But with SEBI Chairman G.N. Bajpai 
              declaiming that the rally is based on fundamentals, things couldn't 
              be better. One, there's a mini-boom of sorts on. And two, it's based 
              on tangibles such as improved corporate performance, a good showing 
              (to date) by the monsoon, and improved industrial growth. Indeed, 
              the fundamentals of the economy have been healthy enough for Centre 
              of Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) to up its estimates for GDP-growth 
              in 2003-04 to 6.5 per cent.   
              In a trend that is at once a cause for the upturn in the stockmarkets 
              and a fallout of that, Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) are 
              back. In June, FIIs pumped in $547 million (Rs 2,581 crore) into 
              the market; till July 14, they had invested an additional $362 million 
              (Rs 1,695 crore). All told, between January 1 and July 14, 2003, 
              their investments in the market is a whopping $1,605.4 million (Rs 
              7,566 crore); in 2001, the best year for FII investments in the 
              market, the number was $2,671 million (Rs 12,821 crore).   One reason for that could be that emerging 
              markets are back to being 'in' with FIIs. And at present valuations, 
              several Indian stocks are a steal.   The quantum of investment by FIIs has led to 
              reports about hedge funds operating in India. Although they cannot 
              invest directly in India, they can do so through FIIs. The latter 
              buy shares on behalf of the former and issue them contracts, termed 
              participatory notes or P-notes. D-street buzz has it that between 
              40 per cent and 50 per cent of FII money coming in now can be traced 
              back to P-notes. Since hedge funds are, by their very definition, 
              focused on the short-term, this doesn't bode well for the Indian 
              market. Unless, of course, the market can keep up its momentum. 
                Several investors believe it can. There's Rakesh 
              Jhunjhunwala the speculator-trader who has been waiting for a bull 
              market for the past year and half. "I am bullish, not by valuations, 
              but by fundamentals," says Jhunjhunwala whose preferences run 
              to PSU- and pharma stocks. Another bull from the late Harshad Mehta's 
              era, Nemish Shah, Director, Enam Financial Services, has emerged 
              from hibernation. Don't make a balance sheet every year, he urges 
              investors. "Look at the long-term picture." Last year 
              the average EPS (Earnings Per Share) for the Sensex was Rs 288. 
              This year, Enam expects it to be Rs 330.   Jhunjhunwala and Shah may well turn out to 
              be right: the current edition of the stock market's rally is broad-based; 
              even mid-cap and small-cap stocks are showing signs of upward movement. 
              Still, the scars of previous bull runs that petered out or turned 
              out to be scam-driven remain. Arun Kejriwal, a broker on D-street 
              is worried by the movement in penny stocks this early in the rally 
              (in a sustained rally, this takes some time). And the buzz on the 
              Street has it that Ketan Parekh, the bull behind the 2001 stock 
              market scam is back. Our recommendation: things look good, but it's 
              still a case of Caveat Emptor.  -Roshni Jayakar 
 
               
                |  |   
                | Jhunjhunwala: Fundamentally bullish |  The Once & Forever BullsTwo who see good things ahead.
 Both, Nemish shah 
              and Rakesh Jhunjhunwala have always been bulls. Shah was bullish 
              on Reliance, ACC, and L&T in the 1992 bull-run. Then, he seemed 
              to have gone cold to the markets (even to the tech wave), although 
              he insists that he was "fully invested" in the markets 
              all along. Jhunjhunwala is a speculator who believes that several 
              Indian scrips are undervalued. In February this year, he assured 
              BT that the Indian market was on the threshold of a sustained bull 
              run. Now, both Shah and Jhunjhunwala are out there, out-and-out 
              bulls. Interestingly, both advocate a medium-term investing strategy. 
              Take a tip from them: buy and hold, then. 
 
               
                |  |   
                | Ketan Parekh: An encore? |  Is KP back?No one knows for sure.
 To some people 
              it is enough evidence that the bull who moved the markets in 2000 
              and 2001 is back. To others, it is inconclusive evidence that could 
              well be a mere coincidence. We're referring to the increase in the 
              prices of Ketan Parekh's favourite stocks. The HFCL, DSQ Software, 
              and Pentamedia scrips, have all moved up marginally. That could 
              well be the result of a secular market rally-as we mentioned even 
              small-cap and mid-cap stocks been part of the recent revival on 
              the bourses-although it really is much more sensational to attribute 
              the interest in these scrips to KP's return.  
  Dropped 
              CallNo, there are no easy answers to this one.
  For 
              back-seat execs caught in one of Delhi's or Mumbai's ubiquitous 
              traffic snarls, the mobile phone provides an escape pod-away from 
              the gridlock and into the rarefied realm of work. Now with 2.1 million 
              subscribers in Delhi and 1.9 million in Mumbai crowding the airwaves, 
              or the 6.2 to 8 Mhz (per operator) of spectrum available, that option 
              is either not available or, when available, often not of a quality 
              that facilitates seamless two-way conversations.
  The problem isn't as acute in other cities, 
              although it is but a matter of time before that happens: Last year, 
              India added close to 6 million subscribers to the existing base 
              of 6 million; this year, it will add another 12 million. Companies 
              providing cellular telephony services lay the blame for the gridlock 
              squarely at the door of the government, which they claim is dragging 
              its feet over releasing more spectrum.   The government has said that it will release 
              more spectrum, although that will take some time. In the meantime, 
              it says, operators can maintain the quality of service by investing 
              in network-upgradation. The Cellular Operators Association of India 
              claims that with the industry's average revenue per user (ARPU) 
              being lower than what it costs to serve a subscriber, none of the 
              operators can do that. Besides, argue some operators, they have 
              already done what they could and point to the fact that cell-sites 
              are located as close as 150 metres apart in high-traffic areas as 
              evidence to this. The man in charge of regulating India's telecommunications 
              market, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) Chairman Pradip 
              Baijal is having none of that. "I do not believe spectrum is 
              a constraint at present," he says. "Maybe later, but not 
              now". Basic operators who use CDMA technology to offer 'limited 
              mobile' services claim their technology uses the spectrum more efficiently. 
              And the calls continue to drop.  -Vandana Gombar 
  RE-INDEXIs It Time To Redo The Sensex?
  The sensex, its detractors 
              claim, is slow to capture upturns and downturns. We tend to agree 
              (which is why we have our own index). Here's why: one, it excludes 
              small- and mid-cap stocks where most action happens; two, it is 
              weighted in terms of market capitalisation and movements of a few 
              heavyweight stocks can make it swing either way; and three, BSE 
              hates making changes in it. "Index composition is reviewed 
              on a quarterly basis," explains Dr Bandi Ram Prasad, Chief 
              Economist, BSE. "It is a widely-tracked index and changes are 
              made only when necessary." Last year saw two changes in the 
              index: ICICI Bank replaced ICICI and HDFC, Reliance Petroleum; M&As 
              made both changes imperative. With the country's largest carmaker 
              and the country's largest cellular telephony company now listed, 
              bse could do worse than be a little more adventurous.  -Narendra Nathan |