Ever
driven with your gaze fixed to a rear-view mirror? There are two
good reasons not to, ever. First, the past may have no more than
a passing relevance to what's ahead. And second, some mirrors-such
as convex and concave types-are designed to create a reality distortion
field to deliver the designer's desired perceptions.
There are also two good reasons to suspend
the many joys of Feel Good living that some of us have grown accustomed
to, and put a knuckle to one's chin for a good think. First, statisticians
are fond of mirrors. Second, no 'superpower' has ever been a superpower
for long without a widespread, dispassionate and active interest
in the "truth, whole truth and nothing but the truth",
to quote the testimonial oath used in the US, under law.
The latest statistic glittering forth in glory
from India's Central Statistical Office (CSO) is '10.4 per cent'.
The very number of digits-two-before the decimal gives it an incandescent
glow. This, folks, is the economic growth rate logged by the country
for the third quarter of the financial year 2003-04, a figure that's
the world's highest for the period. India, people, has become the
world's fastest growing economy!
The world's fastest...
Has the cheering faded slightly? Good. For
those who care to listen, it's time for details. The figure represents
an acceleration from the second quarter's already pacy 8.4 per cent,
which in itself was a pep-up from the first quarter's 5.4 per cent.
Agriculture gave the third quarter its big boost, up a staggering
16.9 per cent, while the industrial sector delivered a robust 7.4
per cent and the ever-dependable services sector, 7.3 per cent.
An all-round economic performance, then, after a long while. Impressive,
it is.
Those were the details. Now for reflections
of another sort. First, does the '10.4 per cent' figure tell us
much about the future? And second, does it really make India the
world's speed champ?
No, and no again. This is because of an inconvenient
bit of information that doesn't always find place amongst all the
glowing numbers. The quarterly growth figures are calculated on
a year-on-year basis, and the third quarter of 2002-03 saw India's
agricultural sector scorched into a 9.8 per cent decline by a devastating
drought. The year was so miserable that any 'normal' back-to-trend
performance would register as a bumper year. A good monsoon in 2003
has ensured just that, and everyone is relieved. But relief is relief;
it's no reason to get overexcited. The peculiar succession of circumstances
means that the entire episode (the tragedy of 2002 followed by the
normalisation of 2003) is a blip. A gigantic blip-blown way out
of proportion to the fact it is supposed to represent.
Anyhow, the blip is in the past now, and it's
best to adopt an unbiased view, thinking ahead. The base for calculations
having expanded this year, it is highly unlikely that the country
will turn out another pacy performance in 2004-05. While services
could maintain a steady clip, the erratic industrial sector shows
little evidence of having achieved a higher growth trajectory. Anyone
entertaining visions of two-digit economic growth towards quick
superpowerhood would be disappointed.
Of course, that's not to say that genuine economic
acceleration is impossible. Intelligent reforms-particularly in
agriculture-could bring about a transformation, and could well proceed
without any convulsions if pursued in a manner sensitive to the
needs and dreams of the country's people at large.
As of now, however, the most touching thing
highlighted by the attempted light-and-mirrors show is how much
farther the country needs to go. To be frank, what matters is not
quarterly but average annual performance over the long term-and
the second half of the post-1991 reforms period has plainly failed
to keep up the growth of the first half. If that's not bad enough,
it's cold comfort seeing an entire economy's destiny turn on some
mysterious atmospheric forces. Nor is it uplifting to see such muffled
appreciation of the truth in a country that once shook up the World
Order with that ideal, and little else.
|