| 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | 1 
                    INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT Ahmedabad
 Like with other great brands, there is something about 
                    the school
 |  Every 
                March, India's educated elite-given the literacy rate of 57 per 
                cent, anyone who is educated belongs to an elite group-revel in 
                the throes of vicarious pleasure. The occasion is placement or 
                recruitment season at India's best B-schools, and reams of newsprint 
                and a chunk of airtime is devoted to 20-something individuals 
                who are in seemingly in possession of attributes for which companies, 
                Indian and multinational, are willing to pay a lot. For the record, 
                this magazine spent around seven pages on the phenomenon, the 
                dominant part on a birds-eye view (number-heavy) round up of placement 
                season in some of India's best B-schools; the more interesting 
                part was a brief profile and a photograph of Ravi Singhvi, the 
                26-year-old from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, 
                who was picked up by HSBC for a salary of $152,000 (Rs 66.8 lakh) 
                a year. Not too long after, a student at the Indian School of 
                Business, Hyderabad attracted a bid of close to $200,000 (Rs 88 
                lakh) but by then, the media- and public-frenzy was dying down 
                and all he could manage was five, as opposed to the conventional 
                15 minutes of fame.  The kind of money companies are willing to 
                pay for MBAs has catapulted B-schools, once ignored centres of 
                higher education, into the national mainstream. A survey of India's 
                top 100 companies by market capitalisation (see Where CEOs Come 
                From on page 102) may seem to indicate that there is inadequate 
                numerical evidence of the corporate world being taken over by 
                MBAs, but that depends on how the numbers are analysed. Of the 
                100, 50 companies are headed by professionals (people other than 
                the founders or members of the founding family or promoter group). 
                Of these 50 companies, 16 are headed by MBAs. That (32 per cent) 
                is not an insignificant proportion, and with time, the number 
                can only increase. Indeed, today the debate on whether one needs 
                an MBA to succeed is almost over (it has been decided in favour). 
                Today, the two most interested parties (recruiters and students) 
                ask similar questions: which schools should we hire from? (in 
                the case of the former) or which schools should we seek admission 
                in? 
                 
                  | THE TOP TEN |   
                  | 2005RANK
 | 2004RANK
 | 2003RANK
 | SCHOOL | BRAND EQUITY SCORE | BRAND EQUITY2004
 |   
                  | 1 | 1 | 1 | Indian Institute of Management, 
                    Ahmedabad | 5.48 | 6.75 |   
                  | 2 | 2 | 2 | Indian Institute of Management, 
                    Bangalore | 2.44 | 2.91 |   
                  | 3 | 6 | 8 | Faculty of Management Studies, 
                    Delhi | 2.09 | 1.35 |   
                  | 4 | 3 | 3 | Indian Institute of Management, 
                    Calcutta | 1.95 | 1.96 |   
                  | 5 | 4 | 4 | XLRI, Jamshedpur | 1.53 | 1.5 |   
                  | 6 | 7 | 5 | Indian Institute of Management, 
                    Lucknow | 1.5 | 1.2 |   
                  | 7 | 14 | NR | Indian Institute of Foreign 
                    Trade, Delhi | 1.33 | 0.8 |   
                  | 8 | 5 | 6 | Symbiosis, Pune | 1.26 | 1.38 |   
                  | 9 | 8 | 7 | Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of 
                    Management Studies, Mumbai | 1.21 | 1.16 |   
                  | 10 | 17 | 10 | Narsee Monjee Institute of 
                    Management Studies, Mumbai | 1.1 | 0.65 |   
                  | In a competitive market (and 
                    the B-schools market is a competitive one in India), MONOPOLY BRANDS: boast brand equity scores between 4 and 6,
 WINNING BRANDS: between 3 and 4, distinct (or excellent brands): 
                    between 2 and 3,
 UNDIFFERENTIATED BRANDS: between 1 and 2, and
 MEDIOCRE BRANDS: less than 1.
 Higher than last year Lower than last year NR: Not Ranked 
                    (last year)
 |   It was to address questions such as this 
                that this magazine launched, in 1997, India's first survey of 
                B-schools. In its first avatar, the exercise was largely conducted 
                by gathering information from schools and recruiters. However, 
                validation proved to be a problem with this method. For instance, 
                most schools and recruiters prefer not to give out salary details. 
                Then, there's the issue of putting together a panel that can rate 
                all papers published by all B-school professors in this country 
                with the objective of establishing a B-school's intellectual credentials. 
                To avoid such problems, this magazine moved to a market-oriented 
                survey where B-schools were rated as brands by recruiters (the 
                heads of hr at companies), wannabe MBAs, MBA students, functional 
                heads and young managers (see The Best By Numbers on page 70). 
                Since 2003, this is the process this magazine has been using to 
                rate and rank B-schools.  
                 
                  | THE RECRUITER'S TOP 10 |   
                  | 2005RANK
 | 2004RANK
 | 2003RANK
 | SCHOOL | BRAND EQUITY SCORE | BRAND EQUITY2004
 |   
                  | 1 | 1 | 1 | IIM-A | 4.02 | 5.4 |   
                  | 2 | 2 | 4 | XLRI | 2.43 | 2.55 |   
                  | 3 | 12 | 7 | IIM-L | 2.17 | 0.88 |   
                  | 4 | 22 | NR | IIFT | 1.6 | 0.46 |   
                  | 5 | 4 | 3 | SYMBIOSIS | 1.38 | 2.01 |   
                  | 6 | 10 | 9 | FMS, Delhi | 1.38 | 0.95 |   
                  | 7 | 20 | 8 | K.J. SOMAIYA | 1.38 | 0.48 |   
                  | 8 | 6 | 11 | IIM-C | 1.37 | 1.63 |   
                  | 9 | 7 | 5 | IMT | 1.33 | 1.28 |   
                  | 10 | 14 | 21 | NMIMS | 1.32 | 0.74 |   
                  | NR: Not Ranked (last year) Higher than last year
 Lower than last year
 |    
                 
                  |  |  |   
                  | 7 
                    INDIAN INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN TRADE Delhi
 In the top 10 in three categories: Recruiters, Wannabe 
                    MBAs, Young Executives
 | ITM, MUMBAI Wannabe MBAs rate this school very highly, in the top five 
                    in fact
 |  The Best And The Rest  The most interesting finding of the BT-ACnielsen 
                ORG-MARG study is that the gap between #1 and #30 in the ranking 
                of 30 schools has narrowed after widening in 2004. In 2003 it 
                was 5.84; in 2004, 6.47, and in 2005, it is 4.82. Can this be 
                interpreted as sign that the overall quality of Indian B-schools 
                is improving? Another finding would indicate that it can. The 
                Winning Brands model that the survey uses to calculate brand equity 
                scores says that any school with: a score over four is a monopoly 
                brand, a score between three and four a winning brand, a score 
                between two and three a distinct brand, and a score between one 
                and two an undifferentiated brand. The model terms those schools 
                that manage only a score below one mediocre brands, but it is 
                this magazine's belief that these are more commodities than brands. 
                  
                 
                  | THE WANNABE MBA'S TOP 10 |   
                  | 2005RANK
 | 2004RANK
 | 2003RANK
 | SCHOOL | BRAND EQUITY SCORE | BRAND EQUITY2004
 |   
                  | 1 | 1 | 1 | IIM-A | 6.42 | 7.16 |   
                  | 2 | 2 | 2 | IIM-B | 3.8 | 3.4 |   
                  | 3 | 4 | 8 | FMS, Delhi | 2.54 | 1.92 |   
                  | 4 | 11 | NR | IIFT | 2.1 | 1.06 |   
                  | 5 | NR | NR | ITM | 1.96 | 0.00 |   
                  | 6 | 3 | 3 | IIM-C | 1.65 | 2.24 |   
                  | 7 | 25 | 18 | Amity | 1.57 | 0.31 |   
                  | 8 | NR | NR | Alliance | 1.29 | 0.00 |   
                  | 9 | 23 | NR | TISS | 1.27 | 0.41 |   
                  | 10 | 10 | 10 | IIM-I | 1.04 | 1.28 |   
                  | NR: Not Ranked (last year) Higher than last year
 Lower than last year
 |    
                 
                  |  |   
                  | 9 
                    JAMNALAL BAJAJ INSTITUTE Mumbai
 It has moved from seventh spot in 2003 to ninth in 2005, 
                    but remains one of the best in the country
 |  In 2003, India boasted a mere eight schools 
                that fell into the first four categories (one monopoly brand, 
                one winning brand, one distinct brand, and five undifferentiated 
                brands). There was not much of a change in 2004: eight schools 
                (again) fell into the first four categories (one monopoly brand, 
                one distinct brand, and six undifferentiated brands). Interestingly, 
                in both years, the same eight schools hogged the rankings. This 
                year, there are 15 schools that make the grade (one monopoly brand, 
                two distinct brands, and 12 undifferentiated brands). The eight 
                schools from the previous years are there, but seven more have 
                moved up the brand equity index.   The other interesting finding (first pointed 
                out in the 2003 edition of the survey, this has since been reinforced) 
                is that there are IIMs and there are IIMs. While the four older 
                IIMs, Ahmedabad, Calcutta, Bangalore and Lucknow have more or 
                less established themselves in the listing, the same cannot be 
                said of the two new IIMs, IIM, Indore and IIM, Kozhikode (they 
                come in at #17 and #19 in the survey).  
                 
                  | MBA STUDENTS' TOP 10 |   
                  | 2005RANK
 | 2004RANK
 | 2003RANK
 | SCHOOL | BRAND EQUITY SCORE | BRAND EQUITY2004
 |   
                  | 1 | 1 | 1 | IIM-A | 5.38 | 7.2 |   
                  | 2 | 2 | 2 | IIM-B | 2.92 | 2.8 |   
                  | 3 | 3 | 3 | IIM-C | 2.78 | 2.31 |   
                  | 4 | 4 | 5 | FMS, Delhi | 2.25 | 1.87 |   
                  | 5 | 9 | 9 | S.P. JAIN | 2.03 | 1 |   
                  | 6 | 15 | 10 | JBIMS | 1.87 | 0.81 |   
                  | 7 | 10 | 7 | SYMBIOSIS | 1.87 | 0.95 |   
                  | 8 | 11 | 16 | ICFAI | 1.55 | 0.91 |   
                  | 9 | 6 | 4 | IIM-L | 1.43 | 1.43 |   
                  | 10 | 19 | 19 | MDI | 1.39 | 0.51 |   
                  | NR: Not Ranked (last year) Higher than last year
 Lower than last year
 |  The Path To Profitability 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | 10 
                    NARSEE MONJEE INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES Mumbai
 Yet another Mumbai school in the top 10; a third of India's 
                    top 30 B-schools are from the city
 |  There's an interesting aside to this survey, 
                one that should be of interest to the hundreds of entrepreneurs 
                who have founded B-schools hoping that the demand for MBAs sweeping 
                across the country will translate into some coins in their coffer. 
                That would seem to be happening. ICFAI Business School, Hyderabad, 
                a school of recent vintage (it is less than 10 years old) makes 
                an appearance in the rankings. Then, the number of B-schools in 
                the top four categories (monopoly brands, winning brands, distinct 
                brands and undifferentiated brands) according to recruiters has 
                increased from eight last year to 15 this year. Recruiters, then, 
                are beginning to look beyond the IIMs. One reason for that could 
                be the emergence of attractive options to the IIMs. Another could 
                be the fact that multinational firms are increasingly hiring people 
                for their global operations from Indian B-schools. By some estimates, 
                last year, some 186 students from the six IIMs landed foreign 
                job offers. That's 186 students less for Indian firms to hire. 
                Which is where Tier-II and Tier-III schools step in to fill the 
                demand-supply imbalance. If there is one thing India Inc. has 
                realised in the 2000s, it is that it cannot thrive without MBAs. 
                 
                 
                  | FUNCTIONAL HEADS' TOP 10 |   
                  | 2005RANK
 | 2004RANK
 | 2003RANK
 | SCHOOL | BRAND EQUITY SCORE | BRAND EQUITY2004
 |   
                  | 1 | 1 | 1 | IIM-A | 5.57 | 7.03 |   
                  | 2 | 10 | 23 | FMS, Delhi | 2.16 | 0.88 |   
                  | 3 | 4 | 4 | IIM-C | 2.1 | 1.05 |   
                  | 4 | 25 | 12 | XIM | 1.67 | 0.34 |   
                  | 5 | 2 | 2 | IIM-B | 1.51 | 3.06 |   
                  | 6 | 20 | 15 | IMT | 1.48 | 0.43 |   
                  | 7 | 15 | NR | TISS | 1.47 | 0.65 |   
                  | 8 | 5 | 6 | IIM-L | 1.39 | 1.14 |   
                  | 9 | 3 | 8 | JBIMS | 1.18 | 1.6 |   
                  | 10 | 21 | 22 | K.J. SOMAIYA | 1.11 | 0.43 |   
                  | NR: Not Ranked (last year) Higher than last year
 Lower than last year
 |  
                 
                  | YOUNG EXECUTIVES' TOP 10 |   
                  | 2005RANK
 | 2004RANK
 | 2003RANK
 | SCHOOL | BRAND EQUITY SCORE | BRAND EQUITY2004
 |   
                  | 1 | 1 | 1 | IIM-A | 5.55 | 6.75 |   
                  | 2 | 5 | 4 | XLRI | 2.17 | 1.5 |   
                  | 3 | 7 | 7 | FMS, Delhi | 2.12 | 1.12 |   
                  | 4 | 19 | 8 | NMIMS | 1.87 | 0.46 |   
                  | 5 | 2 | 2 | IIM-B | 1.83 | 2.91 |   
                  | 6 | 9 | 6 | IIM-L | 1.63 | 0.94 |   
                  | 7 | 3 | 3 | IIM-C | 1.49 | 2.07 |   
                  | 8 | 15 | NR | IIFT | 1.34 | 0.59 |   
                  | 9 | 4 | 10 | SYMBIOSIS | 1.25 | 1.52 |   
                  | 10 | 13 | 15 | IIM-K | 1.19 | 0.65 |   
                  | NR: Not Ranked (last year) Higher than last year
 Lower than last year
 |    |