|
1
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
Ahmedabad
Like with other great brands, there is something about
the school |
Every
March, India's educated elite-given the literacy rate of 57 per
cent, anyone who is educated belongs to an elite group-revel in
the throes of vicarious pleasure. The occasion is placement or
recruitment season at India's best B-schools, and reams of newsprint
and a chunk of airtime is devoted to 20-something individuals
who are in seemingly in possession of attributes for which companies,
Indian and multinational, are willing to pay a lot. For the record,
this magazine spent around seven pages on the phenomenon, the
dominant part on a birds-eye view (number-heavy) round up of placement
season in some of India's best B-schools; the more interesting
part was a brief profile and a photograph of Ravi Singhvi, the
26-year-old from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad,
who was picked up by HSBC for a salary of $152,000 (Rs 66.8 lakh)
a year. Not too long after, a student at the Indian School of
Business, Hyderabad attracted a bid of close to $200,000 (Rs 88
lakh) but by then, the media- and public-frenzy was dying down
and all he could manage was five, as opposed to the conventional
15 minutes of fame.
The kind of money companies are willing to
pay for MBAs has catapulted B-schools, once ignored centres of
higher education, into the national mainstream. A survey of India's
top 100 companies by market capitalisation (see Where CEOs Come
From on page 102) may seem to indicate that there is inadequate
numerical evidence of the corporate world being taken over by
MBAs, but that depends on how the numbers are analysed. Of the
100, 50 companies are headed by professionals (people other than
the founders or members of the founding family or promoter group).
Of these 50 companies, 16 are headed by MBAs. That (32 per cent)
is not an insignificant proportion, and with time, the number
can only increase. Indeed, today the debate on whether one needs
an MBA to succeed is almost over (it has been decided in favour).
Today, the two most interested parties (recruiters and students)
ask similar questions: which schools should we hire from? (in
the case of the former) or which schools should we seek admission
in?
THE TOP TEN
|
2005
RANK
|
2004
RANK
|
2003
RANK
|
SCHOOL |
BRAND EQUITY SCORE
|
BRAND EQUITY
2004
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Indian Institute of Management,
Ahmedabad |
5.48
|
6.75
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Indian Institute of Management,
Bangalore |
2.44
|
2.91
|
3
|
6
|
8
|
Faculty of Management Studies,
Delhi |
2.09
|
1.35
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
Indian Institute of Management,
Calcutta |
1.95
|
1.96
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
XLRI, Jamshedpur |
1.53
|
1.5
|
6
|
7
|
5
|
Indian Institute of Management,
Lucknow |
1.5
|
1.2
|
7
|
14
|
NR
|
Indian Institute of Foreign
Trade, Delhi |
1.33
|
0.8
|
8
|
5
|
6
|
Symbiosis, Pune |
1.26
|
1.38
|
9
|
8
|
7
|
Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of
Management Studies, Mumbai |
1.21
|
1.16
|
10
|
17
|
10
|
Narsee Monjee Institute of
Management Studies, Mumbai |
1.1
|
0.65
|
In a competitive market (and
the B-schools market is a competitive one in India),
MONOPOLY BRANDS: boast brand equity scores between 4 and 6,
WINNING BRANDS: between 3 and 4, distinct (or excellent brands):
between 2 and 3,
UNDIFFERENTIATED BRANDS: between 1 and 2, and
MEDIOCRE BRANDS: less than 1.
Higher than last year Lower than last year NR: Not Ranked
(last year) |
It was to address questions such as this
that this magazine launched, in 1997, India's first survey of
B-schools. In its first avatar, the exercise was largely conducted
by gathering information from schools and recruiters. However,
validation proved to be a problem with this method. For instance,
most schools and recruiters prefer not to give out salary details.
Then, there's the issue of putting together a panel that can rate
all papers published by all B-school professors in this country
with the objective of establishing a B-school's intellectual credentials.
To avoid such problems, this magazine moved to a market-oriented
survey where B-schools were rated as brands by recruiters (the
heads of hr at companies), wannabe MBAs, MBA students, functional
heads and young managers (see The Best By Numbers on page 70).
Since 2003, this is the process this magazine has been using to
rate and rank B-schools.
THE RECRUITER'S TOP 10
|
2005
RANK
|
2004
RANK
|
2003
RANK
|
SCHOOL |
BRAND EQUITY SCORE
|
BRAND EQUITY
2004
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
IIM-A |
4.02
|
5.4
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
XLRI |
2.43
|
2.55
|
3
|
12
|
7
|
IIM-L |
2.17
|
0.88
|
4
|
22
|
NR
|
IIFT |
1.6
|
0.46
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
SYMBIOSIS |
1.38
|
2.01
|
6
|
10
|
9
|
FMS, Delhi |
1.38
|
0.95
|
7
|
20
|
8
|
K.J. SOMAIYA |
1.38
|
0.48
|
8
|
6
|
11
|
IIM-C |
1.37
|
1.63
|
9
|
7
|
5
|
IMT |
1.33
|
1.28
|
10
|
14
|
21
|
NMIMS |
1.32
|
0.74
|
NR: Not Ranked (last year)
Higher than last year
Lower than last year |
|
|
7
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN TRADE
Delhi
In the top 10 in three categories: Recruiters, Wannabe
MBAs, Young Executives |
ITM, MUMBAI
Wannabe MBAs rate this school very highly, in the top five
in fact |
The Best And The Rest
The most interesting finding of the BT-ACnielsen
ORG-MARG study is that the gap between #1 and #30 in the ranking
of 30 schools has narrowed after widening in 2004. In 2003 it
was 5.84; in 2004, 6.47, and in 2005, it is 4.82. Can this be
interpreted as sign that the overall quality of Indian B-schools
is improving? Another finding would indicate that it can. The
Winning Brands model that the survey uses to calculate brand equity
scores says that any school with: a score over four is a monopoly
brand, a score between three and four a winning brand, a score
between two and three a distinct brand, and a score between one
and two an undifferentiated brand. The model terms those schools
that manage only a score below one mediocre brands, but it is
this magazine's belief that these are more commodities than brands.
THE WANNABE MBA'S TOP 10
|
2005
RANK
|
2004
RANK
|
2003
RANK
|
SCHOOL |
BRAND EQUITY SCORE
|
BRAND EQUITY
2004
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
IIM-A |
6.42
|
7.16
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
IIM-B |
3.8
|
3.4
|
3
|
4
|
8
|
FMS, Delhi |
2.54
|
1.92
|
4
|
11
|
NR
|
IIFT |
2.1
|
1.06
|
5
|
NR
|
NR
|
ITM |
1.96
|
0.00
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
IIM-C |
1.65
|
2.24
|
7
|
25
|
18
|
Amity |
1.57
|
0.31
|
8
|
NR
|
NR
|
Alliance |
1.29
|
0.00
|
9
|
23
|
NR
|
TISS |
1.27
|
0.41
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
IIM-I |
1.04
|
1.28
|
NR: Not Ranked (last year)
Higher than last year
Lower than last year |
|
9
JAMNALAL BAJAJ INSTITUTE
Mumbai
It has moved from seventh spot in 2003 to ninth in 2005,
but remains one of the best in the country |
In 2003, India boasted a mere eight schools
that fell into the first four categories (one monopoly brand,
one winning brand, one distinct brand, and five undifferentiated
brands). There was not much of a change in 2004: eight schools
(again) fell into the first four categories (one monopoly brand,
one distinct brand, and six undifferentiated brands). Interestingly,
in both years, the same eight schools hogged the rankings. This
year, there are 15 schools that make the grade (one monopoly brand,
two distinct brands, and 12 undifferentiated brands). The eight
schools from the previous years are there, but seven more have
moved up the brand equity index.
The other interesting finding (first pointed
out in the 2003 edition of the survey, this has since been reinforced)
is that there are IIMs and there are IIMs. While the four older
IIMs, Ahmedabad, Calcutta, Bangalore and Lucknow have more or
less established themselves in the listing, the same cannot be
said of the two new IIMs, IIM, Indore and IIM, Kozhikode (they
come in at #17 and #19 in the survey).
MBA STUDENTS' TOP 10
|
2005
RANK
|
2004
RANK
|
2003
RANK
|
SCHOOL |
BRAND EQUITY SCORE
|
BRAND EQUITY
2004
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
IIM-A |
5.38
|
7.2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
IIM-B |
2.92
|
2.8
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
IIM-C |
2.78
|
2.31
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
FMS, Delhi |
2.25
|
1.87
|
5
|
9
|
9
|
S.P. JAIN |
2.03
|
1
|
6
|
15
|
10
|
JBIMS |
1.87
|
0.81
|
7
|
10
|
7
|
SYMBIOSIS |
1.87
|
0.95
|
8
|
11
|
16
|
ICFAI |
1.55
|
0.91
|
9
|
6
|
4
|
IIM-L |
1.43
|
1.43
|
10
|
19
|
19
|
MDI |
1.39
|
0.51
|
NR: Not Ranked (last year)
Higher than last year
Lower than last year |
The Path To Profitability
|
10
NARSEE MONJEE INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES
Mumbai
Yet another Mumbai school in the top 10; a third of India's
top 30 B-schools are from the city |
There's an interesting aside to this survey,
one that should be of interest to the hundreds of entrepreneurs
who have founded B-schools hoping that the demand for MBAs sweeping
across the country will translate into some coins in their coffer.
That would seem to be happening. ICFAI Business School, Hyderabad,
a school of recent vintage (it is less than 10 years old) makes
an appearance in the rankings. Then, the number of B-schools in
the top four categories (monopoly brands, winning brands, distinct
brands and undifferentiated brands) according to recruiters has
increased from eight last year to 15 this year. Recruiters, then,
are beginning to look beyond the IIMs. One reason for that could
be the emergence of attractive options to the IIMs. Another could
be the fact that multinational firms are increasingly hiring people
for their global operations from Indian B-schools. By some estimates,
last year, some 186 students from the six IIMs landed foreign
job offers. That's 186 students less for Indian firms to hire.
Which is where Tier-II and Tier-III schools step in to fill the
demand-supply imbalance. If there is one thing India Inc. has
realised in the 2000s, it is that it cannot thrive without MBAs.
FUNCTIONAL HEADS' TOP 10
|
2005
RANK
|
2004
RANK
|
2003
RANK
|
SCHOOL |
BRAND EQUITY SCORE
|
BRAND EQUITY
2004
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
IIM-A |
5.57
|
7.03
|
2
|
10
|
23
|
FMS, Delhi |
2.16
|
0.88
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
IIM-C |
2.1
|
1.05
|
4
|
25
|
12
|
XIM |
1.67
|
0.34
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
IIM-B |
1.51
|
3.06
|
6
|
20
|
15
|
IMT |
1.48
|
0.43
|
7
|
15
|
NR
|
TISS |
1.47
|
0.65
|
8
|
5
|
6
|
IIM-L |
1.39
|
1.14
|
9
|
3
|
8
|
JBIMS |
1.18
|
1.6
|
10
|
21
|
22
|
K.J. SOMAIYA |
1.11
|
0.43
|
NR: Not Ranked (last year)
Higher than last year
Lower than last year |
YOUNG EXECUTIVES' TOP 10
|
2005
RANK
|
2004
RANK
|
2003
RANK
|
SCHOOL |
BRAND EQUITY SCORE
|
BRAND EQUITY
2004
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
IIM-A |
5.55
|
6.75
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
XLRI |
2.17
|
1.5
|
3
|
7
|
7
|
FMS, Delhi |
2.12
|
1.12
|
4
|
19
|
8
|
NMIMS |
1.87
|
0.46
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
IIM-B |
1.83
|
2.91
|
6
|
9
|
6
|
IIM-L |
1.63
|
0.94
|
7
|
3
|
3
|
IIM-C |
1.49
|
2.07
|
8
|
15
|
NR
|
IIFT |
1.34
|
0.59
|
9
|
4
|
10
|
SYMBIOSIS |
1.25
|
1.52
|
10
|
13
|
15
|
IIM-K |
1.19
|
0.65
|
NR: Not Ranked (last year)
Higher than last year
Lower than last year |
|