|
Vindi Banga, Chairman, HLL: Global ambitions |
We see sourcing as a stable opportunity,
which is more profitable than our current exports. We have got
a few orders from Unilever Australia, Europe and the US (a trial
one), but you have to remember that there is no rapid ramp-up
in this business.
Vindi Banga,
Chairman, HLL |
At
every annual general meeting (AGM) of consumer goods colossus Hindustan
Lever Ltd (HLL), the Chairman delivers a speech that sheds light
not just on the company's prospects but that also throws up suggestions
on how the country's growth engine can be cranked up. With good
reason: the Rs 11,780-crore manufacturer of home and personal care
(HPC) items and foods is dependent for at least a third of its growth
on macro factors like gross domestic product (GDP) and agri-growth
numbers. In 2001, for instance, Chairman M.S. Banga, at his first
AGM, focused on fuelling a food revolution, and the importance of
agriculture in propping up overall GDP growth.
A year later, on June 26, 2002, Banga chose
to delve on another component that could rev up the Indian growth
mill: manufactured exports. "I believe India should aspire
for an export growth of 20 per cent annum over the next decade-nearly
double the current target of 12 per cent in our Tenth Plan,"
suggested the Chairman. If that sounds like a routine feel-good
CEO soundbyte, hear out the relevance of a boom in manufactured
exports to HLL. "HLL's vision is to build a billion-dollar
(close to Rs 5,000 crore) sourcing business out of India."
Last year HLL's exports
totalled Rs 1,750 crore, roughly half of which was accounted for
by sourcing to global Unilever bases as well as third parties. Banga
hasn't outlined a timeframe for hitting the Rs 5,000-crore mark;
HLL officials point out it's not in the public domain. Yet, in the
perspective of Lever's current operations, that figure makes up
42 per cent of its current gross revenues, and almost 30 per cent
of the total sales of Rs 17,200 crore projected by some analysts
for 2005.
Of course, if the HLL top brass hopes to make
the outsourcing business worth Rs 5,000 crore over the next four
years (the company has a December year-end), it would have to grow
the current exports business by almost three times in that period.
The outsourcing component, (currently worth Rs 875 crore) would
have to spurt by 65-70 per cent annually if Lever hopes to hit the
billion-dollar mark by 2005. Clearly, that target isn't going to
be hit any time soon. "The outsourcing operations can be significant,
but it's going to take a long time, as the gestation period is huge,"
avers Sujay Mishra, equity analyst (consumer goods) with Kotak Securities.
Adds Nirav Seth, who tracks HLL for SSKI Securities: " Currently,
it (sourcing) is an ancillary business, and HLL will need to increase
its exposure rapidly. I can't see it making a meaningful contribution
in the medium term."
Banga for his part is under no illusions that
outsourcing can contribute meaningfully (to the top line as well
as profits) overnight. "I see it as a stable earnings opportunity.
Inventory and marketing costs are minimal, and it can be more profitable
than our current traded exports operations. But this is a business
that has a long incubation time, where there is no fast ramp-up."
There's little doubt there exists a huge outsourcing
opportunity, what with the top 20 FMCG companies generating sales
of $450 billion, and most of the manufacturing located in high-cost
regions. Now add to that the fact that manufacturing and conversion
costs in India are much lower, and you have a tailor-made growth
option. For instance, capital costs involved in making toothpastes
in India are 65 per cent lower than in Europe, and conversion costs
are 85 per cent lower. Similarly, conversion costs in sourcing tea
bags are 25 per cent those in the US.
THERE'S A GREAT OPPORTUNITY IN OUTSOURCING...
|
»
The top 20 global FMCG companies, which generate
sales of ver $450 billion, have most of their manufacturing
located in high-cost regions
»
India enjoys a huge cost advantage. Capital costs of oothpaste
manufacturing are 65 per cent cheaper n India than in Europe
»
Conversion costs too, are cheaper. For instance, the conversion
costs of tea-bags in India is 25 per cent that in the US
»
Inventory and marketing costs are minimal; earnings are stable |
...BUT THERE ARE BARRIERS TOO
|
»
Costs in India may be lower than developed
countries, but countries like China are even more cost-effective
»
Labour cost may be low but labour productivity in manufacturing
is lower, 70 per cent lower than China, and 80 per cent lower
than in the US
»
India's image as far as quality, reliability and customer service
go, isn't too good. So competition from other Unilever bases
like Indonesia is high
»
Earnings may be stable, but there's a long incubation time involved
in executing orders |
That's why HLL is banking on its innovation
capabilities in the home and personal care segment, as well as its
knowledge of plantations, and grading of teas in sourcing tea bags
and instant teas to the West. HLL has bagged an order from Unilever
Australia for tea, a toothpaste order from Europe and a trial order
for tea bags from the US. HLL exports Pepsodent, Close-up and Signal
toothpastes, soaps like Lux, Lifebuoy and Pears, skincare brands
like Dove, Vaseline and Fair & Lovely, Persil and Breeze fabric
washes, Comfort fabric conditioner and Sunlight dishwash to Unilever
companies in North America, Europe, Russia, Central Asian Republics,
the Middle East, South East Asia and parts of Africa. Branded packet
teas and tea bags (Lipton Yellow Label and Brooke Bond Red Label)
are exported to Unilever bases in the Middle East, Australia, the
US and Europe. HLL's soaps and detergents unit near Nagpur is the
only source of the Pears brand for all Unilever bases.
HLL isn't the only FMCG major that's sensed
the sourcing opportunity. Procter & Gamble's (P&G's) India
operations too have been identified as a key hub in P&G's global
sourcing strategy, which revolves around deriving the best cost-efficiencies
from within the P&G world. Currently Vicks Vaporub is sourced
out of India for all Asian countries, except China, even as P&G
has identifed far-eastern bases for sourcing of shampoos and sanitary
napkins. Other material that P&G sources out of India includes
psllium husk, menthol and Pseudoepherine, worth Rs 100 crore annually.
"We derive cost efficiencies by importing from a centralised
manufacturing base versus setting up separate manufacturing bases
in individual countries," explains Ashok Chhabra, Executive
Director, P&G India. In our view more than products like shampoos
or sanitary napkins, India is a very attractive source for drug
products, which have a great competitive advantage."
It isn't as if outsourcing is suddenly the
next big thing to have caught the eye of the Indian manufacturing
sector. A low-cost base coupled with the country's engineering and
design skills have resulted in many multinationals zeroing in on
India. "Manufacturing centres like Taiwan, Korea and Japan
have become high-cost economies. India is well-positioned as far
as labour costs are concerned," points out Sudarshan Sampathkumar,
Engagement Partner, Accenture. So you have companies ranging from
Ford and gm to Whirlpool to Reebok to Emersen to Clariant (see boxes)
making a move on the outsourcing front.
For HLL, however, the outsourcing gambit assumes
significance as it opens another window for much-needed growth.
For nine straight quarters now, Lever has been feeling the effects
of a sluggish economy. This is manifested in single-digit revenue
growth rates (in the latest quarter ended June HLL's FMCG sales
inched upwards by 1.7 per cent), and profit growth has been largely
thanks to non-operations-related matters (supply-chain efficiencies,
and sales of non-core businesses).
Lever, to its credit, has identified new businesses,
and got a few of them running. For instance, confectioneries (under
the Max brand) have been launched nationally and today bring in
Rs 50 crore of revenues, which is no small beer given that the unit
size is 25 paise. Similarly, the ayurvedic products launch under
the Ayush brand is picking up pace. Banga estimates the herbal and
confectionery segments to be worth Rs 4,500 crore, so there's clearly
plenty of potential here.
What's more, it's still too early to dismiss
the power brands strategy as a failure, going by last quarter's
performance. Innovations and market activation resulted in Lifebuoy
turning around smartly, with a 30.3 per cent growth over the previous
year's corresponding quarter, Fair & Lovely clocking 21.5 per
cent, Liril 12.4 per cent, Lux 14.5 per cent and Surf 10.4 per cent.
"The power brand strategy is imperative for HLL, but don't
expect it show results so quickly," says Mishra of Kotak Securities.
Double-digit growth across the FMCG spectrum
may happen only once there's an economic revival, but what must
be worrying the HLL top brass is that the competition is slowly
but surely chipping away at its marketshare in key categories. At
best, Lever can boast that it hasn't lost marketshare (as of May
2002 over June 2001) in the vital personal wash and detergents segments.
But the bigger headache is in shampoos, where Lever has lost 4.5
percentage points primarily because it outpriced itself in the satchets
segment by increasing prices from Rs 2 to Rs 2.50. Banga is trying
to rectify that by rolling back the hike and reducing bottle prices
by 25-30 per cent and introducing an "in-between" product
at Rs 12. The foods business too has witnessed erosion in marketshares,
be it atta, salt, ketchup and vanaspati. The Lever brass, however,
points out that the company's objective of profitable growth is
being met, what with operating margins in the foods business on
the up.
Clearly, HLL needs all the help it can get
to rediscover growth, be it from new areas like confectionery or
herbal products or the much-awaited branded water launch. Or outsourcing,
where the opportunity is huge. But Banga is well aware of the barriers
too. For instance, India may boast low costs, but China is proving
even more cost-effective because India's labour productivity is
pathetic, 70 per cent lower than China's. What's more, Banga has
also to clean up the Indian image on the quality, reliability and
customer service fronts. Else he could well lose opportunities to
other low-cost Unilever bases like Indonesia. If that happens, Banga's
exhortations at the last AGM meeting to drive growth via manufactured
exports may remain just a speech and little else.
1
2
|