|  Disruptions, 
              one could argue, are part and parcel of a nation pulling ahead despite 
              counteractive forces. One even tends to appreciate such upheavals 
              because, especially in a democracy, plurality of opinion-and the 
              ensuing consensus-is the only way to achieve long-term systemic 
              stability. Thus, countries like Malaysia (not fully democratic, 
              though), Taiwan and South Korea can go through the worst kind of 
              economic crises and still bounce back because investors fundamentally 
              have faith in the system. But what do you do when the system itself 
              actively encourages or condones disruptions that tear the very roots 
              of a society? If you are an investor, you leave-with your faith 
              charred.
  That is the sin the Vajpayee government may 
              have committed by its inept handling of the violence in Gujarat, 
              sparked by the burning of returning kar sevaks (Hindu religious 
              workers) at the Godhra railway station in Gujarat, and fuelled by 
              the retaliatory killing of nearly 800 muslims all over the state. 
              As the BJP's (principal constituent of the ruling National Democratic 
              Alliance) rout in the capital's municipal elections shows, the people 
              of India aren't just upset-they are willing to decide and react. 
              The implications are clear: the Vajpayee administration may be on 
              its last leg.  The appeasement of peeved public has already 
              started. Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha has been promising to roll 
              back one after another unpopular, but critical, measures announced 
              in his Budget 2002. He may well become one of the first victims 
              of the war that BJP's arch-rival, the Sonia Gandhi-led Congress 
              Party, has unleashed on it. The going of NDA and the coming of Messrs 
              Congress and Allies do not-and we suspect, will not-materially affect 
              the lives of ordinary people. However, the fanatic-induced instability 
              does threaten to irreparably damage whatever little goodwill India 
              may have earned since it started off on a programme of economic 
              reforms, 11 years ago.  Foreign institutional investors-the barometer 
              of an economy's attractiveness and outlook-are already voting with 
              their feet. Their gross purchases in March 2002 were down by 35 
              per cent over the previous month. Net purchases have fallen even 
              more-by 80 per cent. The slowdown in investment portfolio-especially 
              at a time when other markets like the US are looking up-is now a 
              grim reality.  The more critical issue, however, is of long-term 
              foreign direct investment. Pictures of marauding mobs looting and 
              burning shops even in distant Ahmedabad is enough to distort India's 
              image as an up-and-coming economic powerhouse (well, Time did, in 
              its cover story on the Gujarat carnage, label us Bloody India). 
              Sentiment, even in the cold world of business, precedes reason. 
              And the worst that India can do is to sour investor sentiment.  Already, the country's foreign direct investments-despite 
              its fabled consuming middle-class-are refusing to show any signs 
              of inching up. And the sovereign rating-at a non-investment grade 
              bb+ by Moody's-could take a turn for the worse. Even without such 
              a demotion, India faces plenty of competition for investment dollar 
              from Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand.  Domestic investors, too, do not relish a lawless 
              situation and some manufacturing industries-especially in Gujarat-are 
              feeling the pinch. Big companies such as Hindustan Lever have reported 
              that their revenues in the state may decline because of the Gujarat 
              carnage. And that in a state with the highest project spending of 
              Rs 11,500 crore in the pipeline.  Most analysts would like to believe that if 
              the communal violence and instability can be contained here and 
              now, things could return to normalcy in another two quarters. Yet, 
              this time round the situation seems grimmer. It is not the violence 
              per se, but the government's unwillingness to act that is scaring 
              investors. Even corporate chieftains like Deepak Parekh of HDFC 
              are questioning the relevance of a government that can't protect 
              the lives and property of the innocent.  You can be sure, that's a question many foreign 
              investors will ask before they decide to invest in India. |