| 
              
                |  |   
                | "Hey," asked 
                  Gandhi, "Is this how the money is being used? Distributing 
                  free bags to everyone?" |   The new economy, the Internet, 
              the great leap forward? India still has 72,000 villages without 
              electricity. A thousand Indians share three computers. And a country 
              of a billion people has no more than 3.7 million Internet subscribers, 
              which is roughly 8 million net users-still a joke.  But to say the Internet was a bubble is 
              the easiest thing-and the stupidest. Every revolution in human history 
              claims its victims, forces them to spend time in that trough of 
              disillusionment. This is that time, that trough. The Internet in 
              India, argues Samar Halarnkar in 
              his forthcoming book, is at about the same stage in history when 
              George Stephenson fired up the first locomotive, the Rocket, in 
              the early-nineteenth century. As in the rest of the world, the dotcom boom 
              claimed its victims in a country not yet ready. It forced some humility 
              and accountancy lessons on the garrulous, get-rich-quick kids who 
              occupied column inches and mugged for the cameras for nearly two 
              years.  Yet, some of India's dotcom frontiersmen 
              survive, and grow. Yet, a new bunch of high-tech-but unprofitable-companies 
              in Bangalore find new multimillion-dollar funding. Yet, we still 
              struggle to understand why the Internet and the wired world it is 
              spawning continues to grow. Using the stories of people, cities, 
              technologies-and a rain tree-Halarnkar whimsically chronicles the 
              unfolding of a revolution. Exclusive extracts from Nirvana 
              Under The Rain Tree, to be released 
              in late April by Books Today.  Who would invest 
              millions in a company run by essentially brash, young kids, in a 
              market that barely exists? Pravin Gandhi for one. A precise, wry 
              man with the manner of a school teacher, Gandhi is a director at 
              Infinity Investments, a venture capital fund that has Rs 110 crore 
              available to invest in people like (Vishal) Gondal. The money has 
              been collected from a slew of investors-mostly from the great Indian 
              infotech diaspora in Silicon Valley.  "So when will you get money in the bank 
              from your investments?" I ask.  "I will probably see the first rupee come 
              back a year from now." 
               
                |  |   
                | Nirvana Under The Rain Tree Stories Of Fortune And Flameouts From India's Internet Revolution
 By Samar Halarnkar
 |  It's still only a hope. The Internet might become 
              a part of daily life one day, but it might take half a lifetime 
              -at least. Gandhi, like most angels and VCs, understands this, and 
              consequently, he wants the companies he's investing in to realise 
              this. And he's suddenly wary about the god of the World Wide Web.  "Anything completely Internet dependent," 
              says Gandhi firmly, "is out of the question."  The pundits say the near future is in the companies 
              that will help make the Internet easier to use, the pure technology 
              companies who will help create the tools to truly universalise the 
              Net. Gondal's idea is still unique, still workable, but for now, 
              he must continue to use his gaming talents to make money every possible 
              way.  Despite the Internet shakeout, young hopefuls 
              still stream in to see Gandhi at his utilitarian cubicle-filled 
              office in Parel, firmly in Mumbai's old mill lands, a decayed neighbourhood 
              of rusting textile factories, and the moldy chawls. These crumbling 
              homes still house the forlorn families of industrial workers. Today 
              the empty, blackened chimneys, rusting looms and silent burnt-brick 
              buildings mingle uneasily with the gleaming new glass and concrete 
              office blocks that sporadically soar up from the old mill lands.  As I get up to leave, Gandhi escorts me out. 
              Waiting in the lobby is Gondal, called in to discuss staffing, financing-and 
              the future itself. Should they go ahead with second-round funding? 
              Should they look at a "strategic alliance"? Should they 
              simply avoid the hassle of teaching Gondal management and merge 
              with another company?  As he walks behind me, Gandhi suddenly notices 
              my sling bag with the logo indiagames.com emblazoned on it.  "Hey!" Gandhi turns to Gondal sternly. 
              "Is this how the money is being used? Distributing free bags 
              to everyone?"  Foxed only momentarily, Gondal grins impishly. 
              "But, sir, this was an investment. He's from the press. We 
              have to make sure the media are happy, right?"  "And the media are very happy with this." 
              I show Gandhi the mean-looking, pellet-shooting plastic Colt that 
              Gondal has given me. Gondal's grin widens further. Gandhi grimaces, 
              and shakes his head.  His boys, he knows, will be boys.   A portal, it seemed, 
              was the pathway to the pot of gold. In the first quarter of 2000, 
              six major portals-indya.com, chaitime.com, eIndia.com, 123India.com 
              and go4i.com-were funded, and uncountable other web sites cropped 
              up. The lack of prescience was amazing. Sure, many of the 3,000-odd 
              web sites set up at the peak of the dot com craze were self-funded. 
              But nearly 100 of those were given first-round funding by VCs who 
              simply followed the US-a country where half the population had computers 
              at home, compared to India's measly five million for a billion people-without 
              bothering about the specifics.  By the time 2001 rolled in, second-round funding 
              was becoming a mirage, and each of the six was in serious trouble 
              across the country. Indya.com was struggling to stay the course, 
              laden with highly paid talent and an idea whose time had clearly 
              not come.  Go4i.com, a brainchild of the Hindustan Times 
              group in Delhi simply folded when it was clear that its burn rate-money 
              being expended in staying alive-of a couple of crore of rupees a 
              month, was simply too far removed from the reality of negligible 
              profits. Like so many dot coms, its salaries made no sense.  I was offered a look at go4i's internal papers. 
              The annual salary figures were revealing. Chief Marketing Officer: 
              Rs 19 lakh. Chief of Staff: Rs 16 lakh. Financial controller: Rs 
              16 lakh. Head of web advertising: Rs 11 lakh. Head of Business Development: 
              Rs 14 lakh. Chief Human Resources Officer: Rs 19 lakh. Chief Content 
              Officer: Rs 9 lakh.  With extravagance like this, it wasn't surprising 
              when the expenditure flow chart for November 2000-probably one of 
              the dot com's highest spending months-showed that expenses had crossed 
              Rs 3 crore. The revenues were insignificant.  It couldn't last.  As 2000 drew to a close, the CEO, Piyush Gupta, 
              put in his papers and returned to his plush job at Citibank. Other 
              employees were not so lucky. Many left in droves, but some are still 
              on the job market, trying to find a job that will keep their dignity-not 
              salaries-intact. Formally, the owner of Hindustan Times, the Bhartias, 
              pulled the plug within six months of launch, but not before the 
              dot com had consumed Rs 20 crore. Go4i.com has crumbled to nothing 
              more than a web site. It's kept alive today for only one reason: 
              it's there.  Venture capitalists similarly pulled the plug 
              on the India operations of chaitime.com, a South Asian portal that 
              started in New York but spread to London and Mumbai, like indya.com 
              and indiainfo.com, pulling in the cream of Indian marketing and 
              creative talent on multilakh, even multicrore salaries.  Chaitime.com's problem according to the VCs-mainly 
              eVentures of Mumbai-was it expanded too much, too fast. True, insiders 
              say in private comments, but that happened because the VCs told 
              them too! In the easy come, easy go world of dot coms, details like 
              this don't really matter.  "It was bleeding badly," an industry 
              expert recalls hearing from one of the VCs. "So we slit its 
              throat."  In keeping with 
              the name, the impeccably maintained building called 'Broadband Hub' 
              in Bangalore houses three transnational companies working with broadband 
              Internet technologies. 'Broadband Hub' sits in the old conservative 
              residential area of Basavangudi-a place where cerebral middle-aged 
              and retired folk flock to religious discourses, evening lectures 
              on everything from scientific temper to economic theory, and Carnatic 
              music recitals-where old rain trees still form magnificent tunnels 
              of shade.  Amber Networks is helping shape the optical 
              Internet, where its products will help transform telecommunications 
              into a new era of communication through the rays of light that now 
              scream through the fibreoptic cables rapidly replacing old copper 
              wires. Simply put, if broadband applications are to make a huge 
              splash on the Internet, then communications companies will need 
              to continue purchasing optical networking products to make the Web 
              faster and more robust.  Building the capacious fibreoptic core of the 
              new, emerging networks is the easy part. The bottlenecks emerge 
              on its edges where customers link to the network. Amber is developing 
              an "edge router device" that lends next-generation networks 
              the speed and reliability they need to move voice and data more 
              efficiently.  This is something that greatly interests those 
              who are building the next-generation Internet. So much so that Amber 
              executives who set out to corral about $60 million in funding, were 
              inundated with interested investors during the four months they 
              were raising money. All told, the company was offered more than 
              $100 million. They settled at taking in $91 million- from investors 
              that include the US government institutions, investment banks, telecommunications 
              firms and an electronic maker.  The edge router device market is projected 
              to be around $22 billion in 2003, up from $ 3.6 billion in 2000. 
              In April 2001, Amber Networks was named by Red Herrring magazine 
              in a list of 100 companies that represent the future, companies 
              that ''despite the downturn are either disrupting existing markets 
              or creating new ones altogether''.  It's already happening. In a remarkable deal 
              that bucked the downturn and illuminated the path ahead, Amber Networks 
              was bought out by Finnish telecom giant Nokia for a comfortable 
              $421 million in August 2001. Amber's tale is of particular relevance 
              to the tech sector. If India's Net-dependent companies are to go 
              beyond their sweathouse-coding rep, they must occupy the myriad 
              niches made available by the process of communications evolution. 
              That is just what Amber did with great vision and skill.  For Amber's 230 employees spread across Bangalore 
              and California, it is a time of celebration. "I'm going to 
              spend more time with my family, visit India and improve my golf 
              game."  There is laughter at the other end of the line.  (Sam) Mathan is speaking to me from Fremont, 
              California, a week after he and his board decided to sell out to 
              Nokia.  So did living in the time of a tech abyss affect 
              their decision to make the sale?  "In this time (of the downturn), it was 
              an irresistible offer," says Mathan frankly. "It's great 
              for our employees, our shareholders, but it also showed that our 
              technology was so refined that it fitted in with the future of a 
              company like Nokia. Without them, our technology could not have 
              hoped to access the kind of markets it now can."  Amber's windfall is an indicator that all is 
              well with companies serving the Internet as it continues down what 
              experts believe are the early stages of its evolutionary path. "What 
              this deal says is that the opportunity to build the infrastructure 
              exists in both the wirelines and wireless markets," explains 
              Mathan, an alumni of Osmania University in Hyderabad. "I think 
              the world has just cracked the Internet. We are just starting to 
              stabilise." |