It's
an option that every retail chain shopper must weigh on her monthly
trip to the store: Buy, say, the more expensive manufacturer branded
jam, or pick up the cheaper, in-store brand (or private label, in
retail lingo). Typically, the trade-off boils down to cost versus
comfort. While the private label is cheaper, it is also untested
and comes without the snob value associated with brands. The manufacturer
brand (which we'll simply refer to as brands or branded product
for the sake of simplicity) is typically more expensive but carries
a huge stamp of approval, besides being an ego massager.
For the retail chain, private label makes a
lot of sense. Since most of the private label products are bought
directly from the manufacturer, the profit margins on them are higher.
In India, they can be as high as double that of the branded product.
It is also easier for the retailer to manage the inventory in terms
of volumes and segmentation. Finally, private labels allow retailers
to create their own band of loyal customers. Says Himanshu Chakrawarty,
General Manager (Marketing), Trent, whose Westside chain of stores
is heavily (more than 90 per cent) reliant on private labels: "In
the private label approach, the customer bonding is also based on
the experience of the product, not just the shopping experience."
Others like FoodWorld are increasing their count of private labels.
But the trend is hardly India-specific. A global
survey by ACNielsen of private labels in 36 countries and 80 different
categories shows a steady growth in their value. Between March of
2002 and 2003, private label sales in terms of value rose 4 per
cent to $85 billion, and share in sales stood at 15 per cent-a meagre
0.2 per cent growth. Among five regions that the survey covered,
Europe continued to have the highest value share of private labels
at 22 per cent, but emerging markets (comprising Hungary, South
Africa, Czech Republic, and Poland) clocked the fastest growth of
48 per cent, although its value share was just 4 per cent. North
America, the biggest market for private label in dollar terms, had
16 per cent value share, but growth was nil. But growth in the other
two regions, Latin America and Asia Pacific continued to clip as
multinational retailers expanded geographically, building new stores,
and introducing their private labels into the marketplace.
Traditional Categories Rule: Looking across
product areas, the categories within the paper products, plastic
bags and wraps had the highest private label share, with an aggregate
value share of 29 per cent for the six categories included in the
study. Private label also had a strong share in most of the food
categories studied. In fact, of the top 20 private label categories
in the study, over two-thirds were food categories. Unlike food
and paper products, personal care had fewer private labels with
a 4 per cent share. Cosmetics and baby food have the smallest private
label shares, but grew year-on-year in the double-digit range.
|
|
Gurgaon's Lifestyle (L) and Big
Bazaar: While the former focusses on niche customers, the
latter's strength is price |
Price Differentials Vary: On a global basis,
private label products were found to offer the consumer on average
a discount of 31 per cent versus its manufacturer counterparts.
The price differential range, however, was wide-from 50 per cent
in Poland to a more modest 10 per cent in Hong Kong. Even within
product areas, there was a wide variation in the level of discount.
The personal care and healthcare areas were seen to experience the
highest price differentials, with the average price for private
label products in the personal care categories at 45 per cent less
than their branded rivals. In the health care categories, the price
differential was 43 per cent.
The individual category with the largest price
differential was pain relief (55 per cent cheaper). Other categories
where private label products were priced 50 per cent lower than
brands were face moisturisers, after shave, mouthwash, fresheners
and deodorisers, and shampoo. At the other end of the spectrum,
refrigerated food, frozen food and cosmetics were the product areas
with the smallest price differential.
It's About Price, Almost: For most, the concept
of private label being a more economical option is widely accepted
and historically factual. Retailers have provided their own brands
as the low-priced, high-volume alternative for years. Even in India,
the hard discounter stores have been particularly strong in offering
consumers these types of choices. Take Big Bazaar, for example.
Its own brand of tea is 40 per cent cheaper than competitor brands,
and accounts for half of its tea sales. Says Kishore Biyani, Managing
Director, Pantaloon Retail, which owns the Big Bazaar chain: "We
have studied consumers and found that they have loyalty towards
price in most products." In the case of global retailers, the
strategy seemed to work better where consumers were more focussed
on price than quality.
But as the study found, there are exceptions.
For example, while home care products in general were lower priced,
specific categories such as toilet care and insect control were
higher priced than their branded counterparts. One reason, as the
survey reveals, is that a different type of private label product
has begun to emerge-the premium "branded" private label
product.
Some of these quality products may be branded
with the retailer's name or even have a brand image all of their
own. In India, Shoppers' Stop has three private labels: Stop, Life,
and Kashish. Each of the brands has a clear positioning. While Stop
is a value-for-money category, Life is a fashion label, and Kashish,
a premium ethnic wear brand.
Similarly, Lifestyle has three private labels:
Splash, Nexus, and Two Extremes. The first is a womenswear brand,
the second, menswear, and the third is a high-end imported line
for both men and women. Splash, however, accounts for half of the
revenue from womenswear. "Conventional brands have lesser flexibility
because they have to cater to various types of customers across
the country, but we have only one kind of customer," says Nidhi
Jaiswal, Head of womenswear purchases at Lifestyle.
Almost all the big retail chains in India have
plans of stepping up their private label business, but few-with
perhaps the exception of Westside-want to bank too heavily on it.
After all, the most important thing about retail is offering consumers
a choice.
THE INDIAN SCENARIO
Russell Farmery, MD,
ACNielsen South Asia |
Private
label consumer packaged goods are an emerging segment within
the Indian FMCG universe. Our monitoring of the Indian retail
environment looks closely at the various upcoming modern trade
channels like supermarkets, hypermarkets, department stores,
discount stores, convenience stores, pharmacies and grocery
chains, to reveal the increasing occurrence of store brands
across urban India.
Across the top 28 cities in urban India,
private labels are present in almost as many as half of all
stores classified as modern format stores. While private label
packaged consumer goods find a place on the shelves of all
Indian hypermarkets, close to 60 per cent of the over 1,400
supermarkets possess store brands. Amongst modern format stores,
department and health and pharmacy stores register the lowest
penetration of private labels at 14 per cent and 9 per cent
respectively.
Private Label and
Product Area
An analysis of private label penetration across the broader
product areas of shelf-stable grocery products, shelf-stable
packaged food products and household care washing products
suggests that private labels have populated grocery shelves
in greater abundance. Nearly 45 per cent of modern format
stores observe the presence of private labels in the product
area of shelf stable grocery items like rice, atta, and pulses
with 60 per cent of supermarkets retailing private label grocery
items. A fourth of all modern format stores record the presence
of private label shelf-stable packaged food products while
a relatively lesser proportion (16 per cent) stock private
labels in the household washing material product area.
The Southward Swing
Across cities, private labels differ in their presence within
the modern trade across geographies. Since supermarkets comprise
over 60 per cent of modern trade formats in urban India, our
analysis looks at the penetration of private labels within
supermarkets across 28 cities. While northern cities such
as Lucknow, Kanpur, and Ludhiana indicate that all supermarkets
in these cities stock store brands, supermarkets in southern
cities like Coimbatore, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Madurai, and
Vizag show a greater presence of store brands on an average.
The Presence Of
Private Labels
Evidently, emerging markets like India have only begun witnessing
the emergence of private labels recently. There is no doubt,
however, that this phenomenon, though as yet in its embryonic
stage, will come to be a significant segment as it has in
other developed markets in Europe and North America and compete
for the Indian consumer's share of rupee with manufacturer
brands. While modern format stores contribute just over 12
per cent of FMCG sales across 28 urban cities, they have witnessed
a respectable 25 per cent compounded annual growth rate in
the last five years and can only bode well for the future
of the private label in India.
Deconstructing The
Phenomenon
Can the private label ever be a public favorite? As the brands
are restricted by their parent retailers' geographical progress
and the lack of mass advertising it is hard to imagine what
brought about their genesis in the first place. After all
brands with a limited distribution and little or no traditional
above-the-line marketing seem programmed to fail. Au contraire,
as ACNielsen Power of Private Label report suggests, with
a large chunk of the FMCG sales in developed markets the private
label industry has now burgeoned into a $85 billion market.
So what brought this about in the first
place? With the rapid evolution of modern format stores, retailers
began battling the need to differentiate between themselves.
Enter the private label. This offered retailers a variety
of benefits-primarily that of being able to address various
consumer segments by offering products at various points along
the price spectrum. Or, for that matter, offering consumers
a greater choice in categories with too few manufacturer brands,
creating a better value proposition for consumers by granting
them lower prices and comparable quality.
Of course, negligible marketing costs
and lower distribution costs allows the private label to offer
value, especially in categories that are more functional and
not formulation-led such as paper towels and aluminium foil.
Nevertheless, private labels have also, in some instances,
been able to create enough of an equity to command a price
premium and, may well choose to do so in India as well.
Progress and the
Private Label Paradox
Does this then mean that private labels pose a threat to manufacturer
brands themselves? Again, to the contrary. Doing so would
be tantamount to 'biting the hand that feeds you'. Retailers
depend on manufacturer brands to offer consumers wider choice
so that they don't feel they're missing out on anything by
coming to a certain retailer. Moreover, the symbiotic retailer-manufacturer
relationship means that manufacturers often provide retailers
greater visibility in advertising, promotional incentives
and drive consumers towards them.
Having said that the private label phenomenon
is bound to become even bigger in the days to come in rapidly
developing economies like India and marketers who understand
consumer dynamics within these new retail environments will
find themselves better able to ride the wave.
The rise of mass retailers and modern
formats means a greater proliferation of store brands that
will seek to differentiate one retailer from another by actively
supporting themselves through brand-building activity and
mass advertising. The mushrooming of modern format stores
is all set to nudge this eventuality forward.
|
|