AUGUST 18, 2002
 Cover Story
 Editorial
 Features
 Trends
 BT Event
 Personal Finance
 Managing
 Case Game
 Back of the Book
 Columns
 Careers
 People

Durable Defiance
The Indian consumer market for durables has defied the direst predictions of market cassandras. Category after category, from CTVs to refrigerators, is showing buoyancy in an otherwise gloomy scenario. Is this a market trend-or just the result of some smart marketing by a few players? An investigation.


Question Of Reliability
Foreign tour operators are fed up with India, and are fast deleting 'India'-specific pages from their websites and brochures. Could this be happening? Well, passenger traffic is down, and could fall further. The reasons are many. Among them, what's seen as an uninviting stance of the Indian authorities.

More Net Specials
Business Today,  August 4, 2002
 
 
Going By The Book
If one can show that technological improvements or rates of obsolescence of licensed technology will be rapid, as seen in hi-tech industries, the Secretariat for Industrial Assistance may permit an open-ended technology agreement.

We are an US-based company and propose to enter into a technology licence agreement with an Indian company. Can we continue to charge royalty after the term of the licence?

Under current regulations, technology licence payments are approved by the Reserve Bank of India to be made over a period of 10 years, and you can charge royalties for a maximum period of seven years from the date of commencement of production by the Indian licensee company using the technology licensed by your company or 10 years from the date of the technology license agreement, whichever is earlier. However, you can request an extension of royalty payments beyond the seven-year period prior to expiry. The Secretariat for Industrial Assistance usually grants such extension where the licensed technology is sophisticated, if multiple products are involved, or if rapid technological improvements are made. Therefore, if you can show that your technology is sophisticated or multiple products are involved, an extension of seven years may be considered for running royalties to be paid, but it may be possible that lumpsum fees will not be allowed. Also, if you can show that technological improvements or rates of obsolescence of licensed technology will be rapid, as seen in hi-tech industries, you may be permitted to have an open-ended technology agreement.

  Smile Counter
 
  Oh! And Hmmm...  
  Touch Your Goal  

Further, royalty would not be payable beyond the period of your technology licence agreement if the orders for which the technology had been licensed had not been executed during the period of the agreement. However, if a chartered accountant certifies that the orders have been firmly booked and execution began during the period of agreement and the licensed technology was available on a continuous basis even after the period of the agreement, then royalty can be paid.

Can anti-dumping investigations be initiated against a product imported into India by a single Indian manufacturer at its own volition without support from other Indian manufacturers engaged in the same field?

According to Rule 5 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 Rules, anti-dumping investigations cannot be initiated unless the investigating authority designated by the Central government determines that the application for investigation has been made on behalf of the ''domestic industry''. Under the Rules, a single Indian manufacturer cannot be termed as ''domestic industry'', which is otherwise an aggregate of domestic producers as a whole engaged in the manufacture of an article similar to the alleged dumped article, or those producers whose collective output of the concerned article constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of that article, except where such producers are related to the exporters or importers of the alleged dumped article, or are themselves importers of such article. The designated authority will need to examine whether the domestic producers as a whole are engaged in the same field as the concerned product to determine the degree of support for the investigation application. The term ''domestic producers'' is clearly meant to be construed as in the plural and, therefore, a single applicant cannot be held to be ''domestic producers'', no matter how high a share that producer has of the domestic market. Further, under the proviso to Rule 5(3)(a) of the Rules, an investigation cannot be initiated if the domestic producers in support of the application for investigation account for less than 25 per cent of the total production of a similar article by the domestic industry. It is, therefore, unlikely that an application for investigation into alleged dumping made by a single manufacturer, even if accepted, will be further acted upon by the Ministry of Commerce.


The views expressed here should not be construed as legal opinion and are for reference only. Business Today and/or the author will not be responsible for any decision taken by readers on the basis of these views. Please send in your queries to Legal.bt@intoday.com or Going By The Book, c/o Business Today, Videocon Tower, 5th Floor, E-1, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi-110055.

 

    HOME | EDITORIAL | COVER STORY | FEATURES | TRENDS | BT EVENT | PERSONAL FINANCE
MANAGING | CASE GAME | BOOKS | COLUMN | JOBS TODAY | PEOPLE


 
   

Partners: BESTEMPLOYERSINDIA

INDIA TODAY | INDIA TODAY PLUS | COMPUTERS TODAY | THE NEWSPAPER TODAY 
ARCHIVESTNT ASTROCARE TODAY | MUSIC TODAY | ART TODAY | SYNDICATIONS TODAY