|   We are an US-based company and propose to enter into a technology 
              licence agreement with an Indian company. Can we continue to charge 
              royalty after the term of the licence?  Under current regulations, technology licence 
              payments are approved by the Reserve Bank of India to be made over 
              a period of 10 years, and you can charge royalties for a maximum 
              period of seven years from the date of commencement of production 
              by the Indian licensee company using the technology licensed by 
              your company or 10 years from the date of the technology license 
              agreement, whichever is earlier. However, you can request an extension 
              of royalty payments beyond the seven-year period prior to expiry. 
              The Secretariat for Industrial Assistance usually grants such extension 
              where the licensed technology is sophisticated, if multiple products 
              are involved, or if rapid technological improvements are made. Therefore, 
              if you can show that your technology is sophisticated or multiple 
              products are involved, an extension of seven years may be considered 
              for running royalties to be paid, but it may be possible that lumpsum 
              fees will not be allowed. Also, if you can show that technological 
              improvements or rates of obsolescence of licensed technology will 
              be rapid, as seen in hi-tech industries, you may be permitted to 
              have an open-ended technology agreement.  Further, royalty would not be payable beyond 
              the period of your technology licence agreement if the orders for 
              which the technology had been licensed had not been executed during 
              the period of the agreement. However, if a chartered accountant 
              certifies that the orders have been firmly booked and execution 
              began during the period of agreement and the licensed technology 
              was available on a continuous basis even after the period of the 
              agreement, then royalty can be paid.  Can anti-dumping investigations be initiated 
              against a product imported into India by a single Indian manufacturer 
              at its own volition without support from other Indian manufacturers 
              engaged in the same field?  According to Rule 5 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, 
              Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles 
              and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 Rules, anti-dumping 
              investigations cannot be initiated unless the investigating authority 
              designated by the Central government determines that the application 
              for investigation has been made on behalf of the ''domestic industry''. 
              Under the Rules, a single Indian manufacturer cannot be termed as 
              ''domestic industry'', which is otherwise an aggregate of domestic 
              producers as a whole engaged in the manufacture of an article similar 
              to the alleged dumped article, or those producers whose collective 
              output of the concerned article constitutes a major proportion of 
              the total domestic production of that article, except where such 
              producers are related to the exporters or importers of the alleged 
              dumped article, or are themselves importers of such article. The 
              designated authority will need to examine whether the domestic producers 
              as a whole are engaged in the same field as the concerned product 
              to determine the degree of support for the investigation application. 
              The term ''domestic producers'' is clearly meant to be construed 
              as in the plural and, therefore, a single applicant cannot be held 
              to be ''domestic producers'', no matter how high a share that producer 
              has of the domestic market. Further, under the proviso to Rule 5(3)(a) 
              of the Rules, an investigation cannot be initiated if the domestic 
              producers in support of the application for investigation account 
              for less than 25 per cent of the total production of a similar article 
              by the domestic industry. It is, therefore, unlikely that an application 
              for investigation into alleged dumping made by a single manufacturer, 
              even if accepted, will be further acted upon by the Ministry of 
              Commerce. 
  The views expressed here should not be construed 
              as legal opinion and are for reference only. Business Today and/or 
              the author will not be responsible for any decision taken by readers 
              on the basis of these views. Please send in your queries to Legal.bt@intoday.com 
              or Going By The Book, c/o Business Today, Videocon Tower, 5th Floor, 
              E-1, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi-110055. |