You
don't have to watch a film on Alexander to see how an impossible
arrow can suddenly turn possible. Sometimes all it takes is a Big
Idea. In the world of academia, Nobel laureate Amartya Sen has done
it by coming up with an idea to turn something called Arrow Impossibility
into a distinct possibility.
The idea, actually, is a proposal. A social
choice proposal: "the systematic use of interpersonal comparisons
of individual well-being" in making collective decisions on
behalf of everyone. What has the idea done? It has revived the left-for-dead
academic discipline of Welfare Economics by mathematically showing
how-if the proposal is accepted-a push for economic efficiency (the
traditional Right agenda) need not compromise the quest for social
equity (the classic Left agenda). Nor vice-versa.
That's a big breakthrough. For decades, people
worried that the Free Market equilibrium results in an 'unfair'
division of the pie, but making it fair causes market distortions
which reduce the size of the pie. So it was a case of 'either-or',
at least by way of priority (since in the long run, whether we crack
the riddle of our celluloid time or not, we're all dead). Amartya
Sen's idea rekindles the dream of efficiency and equity.
That, admittedly, is an oversimplification
of sorts. By the actual Arrow Impossibility theorem, no joint-decision
system was said to be possible that could simultaneously satisfy
five desirable conditions. Three of them to do with freedom: independence
(of irrelevant alternatives), non-dictatorship (no single person
enforces his will) and Pareto efficiency (if one person has a preference
nobody objects to, it holds for all). And two conditions to do with
rationality, too mathematical to elaborate here.
Anyhow, by the theorem, something had to give.
All five in harmony? Impossible, they said. Going liberal called
for irrationality, and playing Mr Rational needed some whips to
be cracked. Forget the boon-curse divide, welfare was doomed, people
thought... till Amartya Sen came up with his marvellous possibility,
and gave us fresh hope for a Mutually Assured Destiny that could
contain and reverse the fissures taking us towards its acronym-sake,
Mutually Assured Destruction. That's the power of newly imagined
information. And it's sure worth a try.
|