THE ASIAN FLU
|
Indian investors are waking
up to the perils of globalisation. Still, they can consider
themselves lucky. The Indian stockmarket, after all, has crashed
only in the past two days (as this article is being written);
other Asian ones have been crashing for a few weeks. "This
is because of fears over the Chinese economy slowing down
and a US recovery," says Nandan Chakraborty, Head, Research,
Enam Securities. "The fear of interest rates in the US
going up and the strengthening dollar are pulling down Asian
markets," adds Nischal Maheswari, Head of Private Clients,
Edelweiss Capital. For some time, India's relative insulation
and (absolute) good-news story kept its stockmarket rolling,
but with political uncertainty, at least in terms of economic
reforms, looming large, it was, obviously too good to last.
-Narendra Nathan
|
It
was easily the blackest of Mondays: On May 17, the Sensex closed
564 points down, the BSE PSU index plunged 430 points, and the Bankex
another 355 points. Add the losses of the previous trading day (Friday,
May 14), and the Sensex had hurtled into the red by nearly 900 points,
with foreign investors, point out dealers, selling close to $1.5
billion (Rs 6,800 crore) worth of shares. With uncertainty clouding
government formation, party members-most of whom will never make
it to the Centre-speaking in multiple, anti-reforms voices, and
still others threatening to unleash populist measures like increased
subsidies, the stockmarket experienced one of its scariest days
ever. "Unless stability is brought about via the formation
of a government, consequent statements from the cabinet ministers
such as the finance minister on key policy issues are made, a common
minimum economic programme is agreed upon, investors will continue
to be negative. Crores of investor wealth will be destroyed, which
will affect the purchasing power in the economy and alter the fundamentals
and perceptions of the country," warns Nimesh Kampani, Chairman,
JM Morgan Stanley. Echoes Andrew Holland, Chief Administrative Officer
& Executive VP (Research), DSP Merrill Lynch: "All we've
heard so far is negative news. Till we hear some key announcements
pertaining to government formation and allocation of key economic
portfolios, there will be uncertainty and panic."
May 17, 10.20 a.m.
What happened on Monday, May 17 was unadulterated
terror. Fear prior to the formation of a coalition government that
is-to put it mildly-making ambiguous and contradictory sounds about
the continuity and pace of economic reforms. Within 20 minutes of
opening, the Sensex as well as the National Stock Exchange's S&P
CNX Nifty had shed 553 points, and 182 points respectively- a 10
per cent across-the-board crash. The markets could well have hurtled
deeper into the red had it not been for the daily market-wide circuit
filter that was triggered for the first time since it began operational
in mid-2001. As per the regulations, trading was halted for an hour
on both exchanges. This filter comes into play at three stages of
the index's movement, at a 10, 15 and 20 per cent swing either way.
11.15 a.m.
Those expecting the bloodbath to end in an
hour were dealt a ruder shock. By around 11.15 am, trading was first
recommenced on the NSE, and minutes later on the BSE. The toll this
time round: the Nifty down 276 points and the Sensex a mind-boggling
787 points. This time the 15 per cent filter had been hit. Trading
would now be halted for two hours.
OPERATION BAIL-OUT? NAH
|
|
SBI: Badly mauled |
|
ONGC: No more the stockmarket's
darling |
There is very little that any
government, even if it was firmly entrenched, could have done
to stop the largest ever free-fall of the market in Indian
history, believe most analysts. The reason, as Navin Agarwal,
Head of Research, Motilal Oswal, points out is that the government
just doesn't have the kind of funds to make up for such huge
outflow of funds, especially by the foreign financial institutions.
Remember that the FIIs had pumped in around $10 billion in
the market in last one year and even if the government had
asked the financial institutions such as Life Insurance Corporation,
Unit Trust of India and the State Bank of India, they could
not have really controlled the bleeding.
However, that is not to say that a firmly established government
would not have helped. First, some of the irresponsible statements,
which brought the markets crashing down in the first place,
may not have happened. Secondly, a firm statement from the
finance minister could have stopped the slide much earlier.
And finally, the government would have asked the financial
institutions to come to the rescue of the government as it
did in the case of the Harshad Mehta scam of 1992 and the
Ketan Parekh scandal of 2001.
However, asking the government's financial institutions
to bail out the market comes at a huge cost, points out Arvind
Virmani, Chief Executive Officer, Indian Council for Research
on International Economic Relations. "Such solutions
are fraught with dangers and the Unit Trust of India is a
clear example of how institutions can deteriorate if they
are asked to bail out markets time and again,'' he adds.
Surjit S. Bhalla, Managing Director, Oxus Research and Investments,
believes that the RBI could have intevened in the initial
stages (first 20 minutes of trading in the morning) by adding
greater liquidity to the market, rather than wait for so long.
RBI, for instance, could have ensured easy loans to banks
at cheap rates, which in turn could have lent to the brokers
to take care of their margin problems. The RBI could also
have helped by reducing the margins required by brokers for
a short period, till the crisis was taken care of.
And that's precisely what the US Federal Reserve System
under Alan Greenspan did when the US market lost nearly 23
per cent on a single day, October 19, 1987, losing around
$ 500 billion in one day to save the market. He also helped
pump in a lot of money to prevent the insolvency of commercial
and investment banks.
Various governments have come to the rescue of their markets
whenever there have been problems. During the South-East Asian
crisis of 1987, the Hong Kong government pumped in more than
$ 10 billion to shore up its currency. But then, as Sunil
Sinha, Consultant, National Council Of Applied Economic Research,
points out, currency risks are very different from market
risks. First, there is a longer period when the outflow takes
place and secondly, there is a central bank with a lot of
money to bail out a country in times of currency risks.
-Ashish Gupta
|
By now, marketmen were pouring out of their
offices on Dalal Street in protest as margin calls were triggered
after the first phase of the crash, thereby only succeeding in sending
the indices crashing lower once the markets opened the second time
round. (That's because if a trader has bought shares with borrowed
funds he has to pay additional margins when markets crash. If he
can't pay up the lender will typically sell those shares, thereby
adding to the carnage). Explains Kampani: "Once the markets
fall, and there's a margin call, more selling happens, which in
turn creates more panic, resulting in a further fall, and further
margin calls. It's a vicious circle." The fear is that many
brokers may be trapped.
It wasn't long before Congress leaders like
Manmohan Singh came out with statements, assuring investors that
the government will do whatever it takes to ensure a healthy working
stockmarket. But clearly that wasn't enough to balance out the negative
sentiment created by Left leaders' statements dealing with the scrapping
of the disinvestment ministry, a disinterest in the disinvestment
of profit-making public sector undertakings (PSUs), and an emphatic
"no" to a hire-and-fire enabling exit policy. There's
also a fear that populist measures- such as increased subsidies
for farmers and an unwillingness to hike petrol and diesel prices
despite global oil prices hitting record highs-would be resorted
to by the Congress-Left combine in a bid to reinforce its pro-poor
image, which in turn would do further damage to the already-burgeoning
fiscal deficit.
1.15 p.m.
When trading did begin the third time around
1.15 pm, the Reserve Bank indicated that it was willing to provide
liquidity to banks in order to help them meet their payment obligations,
and that helped prop up the market a bit. But by just a bit, and
the BSE Sensex closed the day 564 points lower, just above the 4,500
mark. Sums up Mihir Kothari, Head of Sales at broking house Motilal
Oswal: "At the beginning of the day there was some nervousness
around, but nobody expected this! The biggest problem was the fear,
which resulted in barely any volumes. Everybody wanted to sell,
nobody wanted to buy."
When BT went to press on Monday, uncertainty
was still at peak levels, what with government formation, and the
drafting of a common economic programme still some days away. The
markets may have not much of a downside left, but to spark off a
renewed rally will call for some well-directed investor-friendly
salvos aimed at Dalal Street from the government in waiting.
|